The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-17-2018, 09:14 AM   #5797
JerTM

 
JerTM's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS M6
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by 90503 View Post
Here's what a "real" Shock SS will look like....minus the hood graphics as well...the graphics ,the painted fascia, and relocated bow-tie, are only on the Sema concept car and not available for purchase as an accessory or option...

Attachment 961017

"The Camaro SS Shock show vehicle also features concept front-end styling that includes a relocated bowtie emblem and concept hood/fender graphics."
You don't say. Pretty sure you missed the post where it was stated as a SEMA car. We are fully aware what the production SS will look like.
JerTM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2018, 11:35 AM   #5798
90503


 
90503's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 14,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerTM View Post
You don't say. Pretty sure you missed the post where it was stated as a SEMA car. We are fully aware what the production SS will look like.

You don't say. Pretty sure you missed all my prior posts, including the very one you quoted, where I mentioned it was a SEMA car.

Congratulations on having seen a Shock colored Camaro in production trim prior to the one I posted. I hadn't seen one. I thought it was noteworthy that the debut of the Shock color was on a SEMA car that could not be purchased as shown.
90503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2018, 12:30 PM   #5799
Royal Tiger
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2013 2SS/RS Convertible
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 3,873
I don’t see how anyone could look at the two side by side and not think the concept car is better looking.
Royal Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2018, 04:35 PM   #5800
FenwickHockey65
General Motors Aficionado
 
FenwickHockey65's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 GMC Canyon, 2020 Colorado
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 37,371
Send a message via AIM to FenwickHockey65
http://gmauthority.com/blog/2018/10/...ew-spy-photos/


CT4.
__________________
2023 GMC Canyon Elevation
2020 Chevrolet Colorado W/T Extended Cab (State-issued)
FenwickHockey65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2018, 07:22 AM   #5801
Snoman
H-Town Camaro Club
 
Snoman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Dusk Edition 2SS/M6/Sun/NPP
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,234
2019 Yenko. 1,000+ hp.


https://jalopnik.com/the-2019-yenko-...uy-1829812400?
Snoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2018, 07:59 AM   #5802
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snoman View Post
I appreciate that you can buy a new Yenko Camaro...but why not base it on the ZL1 instead of an SS?
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2018, 09:11 AM   #5803
JerTM

 
JerTM's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS M6
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-99SS View Post
I appreciate that you can buy a new Yenko Camaro...but why not base it on the ZL1 instead of an SS?
I would go out on a limb and say they probably chose the SS because of the base price. I'm sure it's a very expensive package to add and there would be a lot less sold if the base price was a ZL-1. But I agree, from an enthusiast stand point the ZL1 would have been a better starting point.
JerTM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2018, 05:37 AM   #5804
Snoman
H-Town Camaro Club
 
Snoman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Dusk Edition 2SS/M6/Sun/NPP
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,234
Contracting and licensing restrictions.


I can guarantee you anyone purchasing a Yenko isn't concerned about price. The drivetrain, diff, axles, susp and trany are arguably the only potential reason to start with a ZL1, but they aren't using a GM blower if I read correctly.
Snoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2018, 08:17 AM   #5805
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snoman View Post
Contracting and licensing restrictions.


I can guarantee you anyone purchasing a Yenko isn't concerned about price. The drivetrain, diff, axles, susp and trany are arguably the only potential reason to start with a ZL1, but they aren't using a GM blower if I read correctly.
I'm just thinking that they wouldn't have to do the 6.8L build etc, just H/C and aftermarket blower on an LT4 and you can make the same power...but I do understand Yenko owners wanting a "special engine build" over a modded LT4. Last and most important is that I would prefer the ZL1 front end, cooling, etc over the SS for obvious reasons at this power level.
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2018, 11:23 AM   #5806
RLHMARINES
1st Civ. Div.
 
RLHMARINES's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaroless for now...RIP "Big SexZ"
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,726
A rumored replacement for the V8 6.0 HD truck engine supposed to be a 400 cubic inch (6.6 ltr) V8 from the article below at gmauthority.

http://gmauthority.com/blog/2018/10/...soline-engine/
__________________
Swift....Silent....Deadly
RLHMARINES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2018, 11:55 AM   #5807
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
So what is the real reason for not just using the 6.2 in the HD? Is it b/c they don't want all that AFM and other fuel efficiency "stuff" in their work horse engine?
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2018, 12:34 PM   #5808
RLHMARINES
1st Civ. Div.
 
RLHMARINES's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaroless for now...RIP "Big SexZ"
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,726
Aluminum block and higher compression ratio are probably some of the more likely reasons for the 6.2 not being used for HD duty.
__________________
Swift....Silent....Deadly
RLHMARINES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2018, 12:52 PM   #5809
SnakeEyeSS

 
SnakeEyeSS's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro 2SS & ZL1
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 857
The Shock concept press release makes it sound like the stuff is a sure thing.

Quote:
The color made its debut on a 2019 Camaro SS show car that will be on display at the SEMA Show Oct. 30-Nov. 2 in Las Vegas, where it will be shown with new accessories and performance parts available from Chevrolet dealers.
They KNOW it would sell.

But later it says "also features concept styling".
__________________
2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Bright Yellow NPP MRC
2023 Camaro ZL1 A10 Radiant Red
SnakeEyeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2018, 08:03 AM   #5810
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by RLHMARINES View Post
Aluminum block and higher compression ratio are probably some of the more likely reasons for the 6.2 not being used for HD duty.
I find it a bit odd, as my 6.2 does great towing.
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
fenwickhockey65, gm questions, questions


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.