Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > ZL1 Discussions


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-08-2021, 03:00 PM   #29
Katech_Mike

 
Drives: 2015 Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Clinton Twp, Michigan
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshinator99 View Post
Agreed!



830 WHP corrected to STD is about 790-800 SAE which sounds about right for LT4 fueling. If you run 95 octane zero ethanol (or higher octane) you can stretch it further since it’s the E content that limits you on those injectors. I believe Vengeance did a bit over 900 STD with 95 octane zero ethanol by pushing the limit in terms of timing and fueling, but I seriously doubt they would have been willing to send that tune out the door to a customer.

I did the LPE high side (BB HPFP and LT4+52% injectors) with good results (906 SAE/942 STD) with plenty of wiggle room. The XDI stuff can stretch you a bit further since they add a second LT4 HPFP but I didn’t want to do that since my setup is simpler & cleaner. Port makes a bit less power than DI but the head room on a port system is pretty huge and likely a good amount less money (especially the toohighpsi setup). I wasn’t comfortable relying on meth at all, but to each their own.
We dyno everything in SAE. 830RWHP is about all the fuel system has on 93 using a 38% fuel lobe on our dyno.

We have made 870RWHP using XDI 30% injectors with a LT4 high side pump. At that point the high side pump is tapped.

I wouldn't recommend trying to run any mix of E at those power levels. There just isn't enough injector/pump to support it with OEM LT4 components.

The LPE pump is only about 10% better than the LT4 pump. If you're trying to run full E85 on DI only the XDI XFP system is currently the only option.
Katech_Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2021, 06:06 PM   #30
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katech_Mike View Post
We dyno everything in SAE. 830RWHP is about all the fuel system has on 93 using a 38% fuel lobe on our dyno.

We have made 870RWHP using XDI 30% injectors with a LT4 high side pump. At that point the high side pump is tapped.

I wouldn't recommend trying to run any mix of E at those power levels. There just isn't enough injector/pump to support it with OEM LT4 components.

The LPE pump is only about 10% better than the LT4 pump. If you're trying to run full E85 on DI only the XDI XFP system is currently the only option.
The LPE pump is only 10% better when driven by the same fuel lobe. However the LT4 pump can only handle up to a 38% lobe. The LPE gen 2 pump can run a 42 or 44% lobe(can't remember which off hand). So pair the LPE pump with the bigger lobe(GT35 cam with 7.85mm lobe for ex.) and it will go a bit further then the LT4 pump with 38% lobe.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2021, 06:08 AM   #31
Smokin19

 
Drives: 19' ZL1 A10, w/pdr
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: S.W. ohio
Posts: 1,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
The LPE pump is only 10% better when driven by the same fuel lobe. However the LT4 pump can only handle up to a 38% lobe. The LPE gen 2 pump can run a 42 or 44% lobe(can't remember which off hand). So pair the LPE pump with the bigger lobe(GT35 cam with 7.85mm lobe for ex.) and it will go a bit further then the LT4 pump with 38% lobe.
Not trying to hijack a thread and very much a newbe to these LT4 engines and have a lot to learn. Saying that, I have a question about the the cam with a 38% lobe. I am planning a build with the 38% cam lobe. My build (app. 700-750 hp) will also include the Kong X port and simular to what the OP is doing. I am not chasing any number as this will be a build just for the street. My question is the durability / longevity of the high side pump using this cam lobe?

Another question, I will also be adding a low side pump but, don't like the idea of tapping into the fuel tank, is there an alternative?
__________________
BTR Stg II cam w/ 38% fuel lobe, ARH 2" headers into 3" w/cats, AWE Touring, Kong X port, Weapon X triple ht exchangers, NW 103, Rotofab big gulp, DSX lowside, TCM tune, BMR Lockout, Mustang dyno 720 rwhp, 634 rwtq on 93 pump.
Smokin19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2021, 09:22 AM   #32
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smokin19 View Post
Not trying to hijack a thread and very much a newbe to these LT4 engines and have a lot to learn. Saying that, I have a question about the the cam with a 38% lobe. I am planning a build with the 38% cam lobe. My build (app. 700-750 hp) will also include the Kong X port and simular to what the OP is doing. I am not chasing any number as this will be a build just for the street. My question is the durability / longevity of the high side pump using this cam lobe?

Another question, I will also be adding a low side pump but, don't like the idea of tapping into the fuel tank, is there an alternative?
I have no idea on the longevity of the LT4 HPFP using a 38% lobe. Most that mod these engines that far do not seem to rack up a lot of miles and report back. I have heard through the grapevine that some shops report issues with a 38% lobe then others say it's fine.

Lingenfelter makes a drop in pump assembly that would give you more low side headroom. I do think it would work fine for many builds especially with a JMS hitting it with a few more volts when in boost. The Fore triple pump setup is the ultimate solution and is what LPE uses majority of the time on the 1000hp builds.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2021, 12:16 PM   #33
GreenZLE
 
Drives: 2020 Rally Green ZL1-1LE
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Illinois
Posts: 324
Has anyone used a DeatchWerks 440 pump on the low side? Any real benefit above the factory pump?
GreenZLE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2021, 03:11 PM   #34
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,800
Not sure...have heard some using a Hellcat pump as a upgrade.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2021, 03:41 PM   #35
swisstyphoon
Former GM Technician
 
swisstyphoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 A10, 06 Silverado Duramax
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 341
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenZLE View Post
Has anyone used a DeatchWerks 440 pump on the low side? Any real benefit above the factory pump?
Deatschwerks told me this week, that they are currently developing a dual in tank bucket kit for our cars.
__________________
2018 Camaro ZL1 A10
Rotofab Big Gulp, Nick Williams 103, Magnuson 2650, 9.17" (14%) lower, 90mm upper, Vengeance Racing Heads (LME) Cam Package (Cammotion Stage 1), Johnson Lifters, JMS Voltage Booster, Lingenfelter high flow check valve, BBK shorty headers, Custom 2.75" down pipes, Gesi Gen2 high flow cats, MM catch can 791whp, 772ft-lbs SAE
Just added 30% XDI Injectors, LPE big bore hpfp, Flex fuel.
Elite tuning, results coming soon.


2006 Silverado Duramax Diesel
MPI Compound Turbo
40% over Injectors
Efi Live DSP5 Tuning

Follow me on Instagram: Swisstyphoon1980
swisstyphoon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2021, 03:54 PM   #36
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,560
I've referred to your corrected 830 wheel number here before as being close to what KaTech sees as the limit for the OEM high side on pump gas at lower elevations including your shop.

If I make 830 corrected wheel up here using a 20% correction it's like 700 measured HP up here, which means I can run some E85 to help make up part of the loss and ask more of my OEM pump/injectors. I don't yet know how much.

In this cool part of the year at your KaTech shop, how much of a CF on average would your dyno use, 3-5%?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katech_Mike View Post
We dyno everything in SAE. 830RWHP is about all the fuel system has on 93 using a 38% fuel lobe on our dyno.

We have made 870RWHP using XDI 30% injectors with a LT4 high side pump. At that point the high side pump is tapped.

I wouldn't recommend trying to run any mix of E at those power levels. There just isn't enough injector/pump to support it with OEM LT4 components.

The LPE pump is only about 10% better than the LT4 pump. If you're trying to run full E85 on DI only the XDI XFP system is currently the only option.
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.

Last edited by JSH; 10-09-2021 at 07:44 PM.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2021, 06:12 PM   #37
Joshinator99


 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,751
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenZLE View Post
Has anyone used a DeatchWerks 440 pump on the low side? Any real benefit above the factory pump?
I tried a DW400 with a JMS voltage booster. I don't think it was worth the effort over a typical LT4 in-tank. I want to say around 800 WHP on 93 octane I was out of fuel on the low side yet again. I should have went right to the Fore setup when the LT4 wasn't cutting it... Oh well, my shop is getting really good at dropping my fuel tank these days.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2021, 06:57 PM   #38
GreenZLE
 
Drives: 2020 Rally Green ZL1-1LE
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Illinois
Posts: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshinator99 View Post
I tried a DW400 with a JMS voltage booster. I don't think it was worth the effort over a typical LT4 in-tank. I want to say around 800 WHP on 93 octane I was out of fuel on the low side yet again. I should have went right to the Fore setup when the LT4 wasn't cutting it... Oh well, my shop is getting really good at dropping my fuel tank these days.
I remember following your post and I was hopeful it would have worked out. Now that this 440 pump is out, I'd hoped it would make a swap worth while.


FYI, I picked up an extra in tank pump for $140 out the door so I'd have something on hand to mod when the time came.
GreenZLE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2021, 11:31 AM   #39
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smokin19 View Post
Not trying to hijack a thread and very much a newbe to these LT4 engines and have a lot to learn. Saying that, I have a question about the the cam with a 38% lobe. I am planning a build with the 38% cam lobe. My build (app. 700-750 hp) will also include the Kong X port and simular to what the OP is doing. I am not chasing any number as this will be a build just for the street. My question is the durability / longevity of the high side pump using this cam lobe?

Another question, I will also be adding a low side pump but, don't like the idea of tapping into the fuel tank, is there an alternative?
The due diligence I've done so far on making say 750-800 wheel actual/uncorrected with a new high side pump and injectors leaves me with these:

LPE's Big Bore high side ($1735) https://www.lingenfelter.com/product...l#.YWm7cRrMJMs

XDI 30% injectors ($2500)
https://shop.katechengines.com/produ...-injectors-30/

DI (LPE $6400) seems to be the next step up.

Really no choice on the high side but numerous choices on injectors. KingLT1 has recommended FIC +30's.
Basically all I've done is confirm what others have said here previously.
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.

Last edited by JSH; 10-21-2021 at 07:45 AM.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2021, 07:01 AM   #40
Choda
 
Drives: Turbo 6.2
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 702
Is the general rule for upgrading injectors once you hit the 6ms threshold?
__________________
2016 Turbo Camaro SS - 800hp/900tq 9.7@146
2018 LTZ Z71 Redline Silverado - 381hp/420tq 13.8@100
Choda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2021, 08:56 AM   #41
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by Choda View Post
Is the general rule for upgrading injectors once you hit the 6ms threshold?
Depends on your SOI table. If it's adjusted to start injecting fuel as early as possible then you can get away with higher pulse widths. I believe the caveat is that it costs a little combustion efficiency but allows us to get more fuel in the chamber without spraying it out the exhaust causing a false rich condition. In a perfect world we don't do much with SOI and have enough fuel to keep injectors down around 5ms or less.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.