NEW POWER NUMBERS - SHOULD I BE DISAPPOINTED? - Page 2

boosedep3 · 07-13-2021, 07:52 PM

Mustang dynos are heart breakers, but in the end it is just a number.

arpad_m · 07-13-2021, 09:14 PM

This may sound unorthodox, and certainly do clear up the specifics with Ted, but if the car feels like you're gonna s*** your pants when you floor it in second or third, that's all that matters

Ron_Robinson1 · 07-13-2021, 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boosedep3

Mustang dynos are heart breakers, but in the end it is just a number.

Not always

Ron_Robinson1 · 07-13-2021, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MartinLe

The tech said I was making 10 psi at 528' elevation on a low 70 degree day. I am going to shoot Ted an email with the pull sheet and see what he says.

Per my previous post asking what gear your pulls were done in.

6th vs 7th gear numbers will be different, I would confirm this first.

Spaceme1117 · 07-14-2021, 06:40 AM

For the love of God people, rotate your pictures before you post them.

wnta1ss · 07-14-2021, 07:02 AM

Why would the dyno guy give you uncorrected numbers that are over a year apart? The whole point of the dyno is finding out what your changes did, so weather correction is needed. Did he tell you why he gave you an uncorrected sheet? Because the only valid reason to do so would be if his weather station is broken, but he should have told you if that was the case.

Ron_Robinson1 · 07-14-2021, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spaceme1117

For the love of God people, rotate your pictures before you post them.

Nope…turn your head

MartinLe · 07-14-2021, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron_Robinson1

What gear was the pull in?

Start with that…I also was tuned on a mustang dyno. 95% of my tuning was done in 6th gear. Final pull was done in 7th gear to get my final number. Some shops don’t like taking there dynos to 180-200 mph spins. My car touches 198. I will post my sheets later, but there was definitely a difference in the 6 vs 7th gear pull.

4th gear. I have an M6

Quote:

Originally Posted by Markoz28

Was this remote tuned by Ted or the shop doing the dyno?

For reference my first round of mods were 9.1 lower pulley, 2" headers with no cats and Rotofab. Car was tuned by the shop that installed with 579whp on a dynojet. I was disappointed as well and felt the car idle and drive very strange. I took the car to MS tuning 5hrs away and on his Mustang Dyno and no changes it made 556whp. He then did the tune and it made 612whp.

Tuning is a real big deal!

I have since done remote tuning with Ted on last mod revision and I am very pleased with results.

Ted remote tuned the car. He has requested the logs of the run. I will get those today. The car idles as it always did, you know a little rough, but again, just like it did stock. It runs smooth and strong. I have a date with a Dynojet in two weeks.

CW3SF · 07-14-2021, 05:32 PM

On a Dynojet showing Corrected numbers, near sea level and with the JRE 125 kit on e60 you should have no problem making 625-650rwhp IMHO. The lower end of that if you are running e40-e50.

MartinLe · 07-15-2021, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arpad_m

This may sound unorthodox, and certainly do clear up the specifics with Ted, but if the car feels like you're gonna s*** your pants when you floor it in second or third, that's all that matters

S*** - why, yes sir! Every time I let the dogs out they hunt like there is no tomorrow. And, when I have passengers, even the ones that claim "Badass big block pasts" grin like school boys looking at their first Playboy!

Quote:

Originally Posted by wnta1ss

Why would the dyno guy give you uncorrected numbers that are over a year apart? The whole point of the dyno is finding out what your changes did, so weather correction is needed. Did he tell you why he gave you an uncorrected sheet? Because the only valid reason to do so would be if his weather station is broken, but he should have told you if that was the case.

SAE corrected at 571 whp.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CW3SF

On a Dynojet showing Corrected numbers, near sea level and with the JRE 125 kit on e60 you should have no problem making 625-650rwhp IMHO. The lower end of that if you are running e40-e50.

I have a date with a Dynojet on the 28th. I'm running e60 at 528' and it should be sub-70 degrees and dry at pull time. I'll post the results.

I sent Ted the logs and he is pleased.

wnta1ss · 07-16-2021, 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MartinLe

SAE corrected at 571 whp.

But what was the stock baseline in SAE? You NEED that to know what your mods actually did for horsepower. Weather can vary, and with it, correction factors change.

iwk2much · 07-16-2021, 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MartinLe

I sent Ted the logs and he is pleased.

What wideband did you install? Looking to do remote tuning as well...

MartinLe · 07-16-2021, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wnta1ss

But what was the stock baseline in SAE? You NEED that to know what your mods actually did for horsepower. Weather can vary, and with it, correction factors change.

I did not get the SAE numbers from the stock pull (did not know any better). From my limited experience, I should be able to figure out my gains from the upcoming Dynojet session. But, as I posted, Ted saw the pull sheet and logs and he is pleased.

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwk2much

What wideband did you install? Looking to do remote tuning as well...

AEM Electronics 30-0334 - AEM Electronics X-Series Wideband UEGO Air/Fuel Sensor Controller Gauge.

Check out this link: https://www.summitracing.com/parts/avm-30-0334

And, STOP working to much!!!

07-13-2021, 09:14 PM	#16
arpad_m Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Jul 2017 Location: East Tennessee Posts: 11,601 View My Garage	This may sound unorthodox, and certainly do clear up the specifics with Ted, but if the car feels like you're gonna s*** your pants when you floor it in second or third, that's all that matters __________________ 2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6 735 rwhp \| 665 rwtq Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley \| Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers \| JRE smooth idle terminator cam \| LT4 FS & injectors \| TSP forged pistons & rods JMS PowerMAX \| DSX flex fuel kit \| Roto-Fab CAI \| Soler 95mm LT5 TB \| 1LE wheels \| 1LE brakes \| BMR rear cradle lockout \| JRE custom tune 1100 - 1/30/18 \| 2000 - 1/31/18 3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18 3400 - 2/19/18 \| 3800 - 2/26/18 4300 - 2/27/18 \| 4B00 - 3/01/18 4200 - 3/05/18 \| 4800 - 3/14/18 5000 - 3/16/18 \| 6000 - 3/19/18

07-14-2021, 05:32 PM	#23
CW3SF Drives: 2019 Chevy Camaro ZL1 M6 Join Date: Jul 2019 Location: Sea level Posts: 1,252 View My Garage	On a Dynojet showing Corrected numbers, near sea level and with the JRE 125 kit on e60 you should have no problem making 625-650rwhp IMHO. The lower end of that if you are running e40-e50. __________________ Kong Stage X Port, NW103, LPE HPFP, XDI +30 Injectors, ARH Headers, Flex Fuel, JMS Booster, AWE Touring, Elite E2-X CC. Stock heads, stock cam, stock pulleys: Tuned by KingLT1. 740whp Uncorrected on e50

07-13-2021, 07:52 PM	#15
boosedep3 Drives: 2018 SS1LE Join Date: Dec 2018 Location: Maryland Posts: 150	Mustang dynos are heart breakers, but in the end it is just a number.

07-14-2021, 06:40 AM	#19
Spaceme1117 Drives: 2017 Camaro SS, 2011 Corvette GS Join Date: Feb 2019 Location: Erlanger, Kentucky 41018 Posts: 815	For the love of God people, rotate your pictures before you post them.

07-14-2021, 07:02 AM	#20
wnta1ss Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: NH Posts: 1,692	Why would the dyno guy give you uncorrected numbers that are over a year apart? The whole point of the dyno is finding out what your changes did, so weather correction is needed. Did he tell you why he gave you an uncorrected sheet? Because the only valid reason to do so would be if his weather station is broken, but he should have told you if that was the case.

User Name		Remember Me?
Password