Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > Z/28 Discussions


Phastek Performance


View Poll Results: What do you think will power the Z/28? (
Small (5 - 5.5L range) high revving engine 26 8.10%
LT1 with minor power bump (CAI, exhaust, etc) 10 3.12%
Heavily reworked LT1, similar to the LS6 from the C5 Z06; ~500 hp 65 20.25%
Large displacement sucessor to the LS7, ~550 hp 129 40.19%
LT4, same as from the ZL1, CTS-v, and Z06 50 15.58%
'super LT4' with a bigger blower or turbos making 700+ 31 9.66%
Other (please specify) 10 3.12%
Voters: 321. You may not vote on this poll

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-21-2016, 07:39 PM   #197
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Sure, it's easy when you don't have to comply with smog and fuel regulations, or guarantee it will last for over 100k miles.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2016, 01:34 PM   #198
6spdhyperblue


 
Drives: 6th gen
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,678
the first time i thought this i thought it was crazy, but more and more i think about it, i think if its low volume, the ls7 could come back.

the fact that they are still using the LS architecture in the HD trucks is leading me that it could be possible. what do you think
6spdhyperblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2016, 01:53 PM   #199
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicul15 View Post
the first time i thought this i thought it was crazy, but more and more i think about it, i think if its low volume, the ls7 could come back.

the fact that they are still using the LS architecture in the HD trucks is leading me that it could be possible. what do you think
The LS and truck engines are different, so that doesn't mean the LS7 is still alive.

If they can do another n/a Z/28, I would rather it get the improvements of the LTx.

The LS3 was 430 hp. The LT1 is 455. If they built a 7.0 LTx with the same basic improvements, it would be 540 hp.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2016, 02:05 PM   #200
BradfordCamaro
SABIO
 
BradfordCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 CAMARO 1SS
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Bradford, ON
Posts: 5,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicul15 View Post
the first time i thought this i thought it was crazy, but more and more i think about it, i think if its low volume, the ls7 could come back.

the fact that they are still using the LS architecture in the HD trucks is leading me that it could be possible. what do you think
Just with a better tune up to 550-575HP
__________________



BradfordCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2016, 02:08 PM   #201
6spdhyperblue


 
Drives: 6th gen
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
The LS and truck engines are different, so that doesn't mean the LS7 is still alive.

If they can do another n/a Z/28, I would rather it get the improvements of the LTx.

The LS3 was 430 hp. The LT1 is 455. If they built a 7.0 LTx with the same basic improvements, it would be 540 hp.
how are they different? they share the same architecture the parts are interchangable. i would imagine the manufacturing process is the same besides them handbuilding the ls7?
they are still producing them for GMPP crate engines right? are they NOS?
its a big speculation across the board but if they brough a legacy engine into a new vehicle there, it might be possible here.

i thought they already said the LTx 7.0 didn't meet emissions. maybe not for high production vehicles like the Z06/ZL1?
6spdhyperblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2016, 03:29 PM   #202
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicul15 View Post
how are they different? they share the same architecture the parts are interchangable. i would imagine the manufacturing process is the same besides them handbuilding the ls7?
they are still producing them for GMPP crate engines right? are they NOS?
its a big speculation across the board but if they brough a legacy engine into a new vehicle there, it might be possible here.

i thought they already said the LTx 7.0 didn't meet emissions. maybe not for high production vehicles like the Z06/ZL1?
The architecture is the same and the components are interchangeable, but the details are different. Different cams, different intakes, different power and torque.

That's why they have different designations.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2016, 04:43 PM   #203
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,372
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicul15 View Post
how are they different? they share the same architecture the parts are interchangable. i would imagine the manufacturing process is the same besides them handbuilding the ls7?
they are still producing them for GMPP crate engines right? are they NOS?
its a big speculation across the board but if they brough a legacy engine into a new vehicle there, it might be possible here.

i thought they already said the LTx 7.0 didn't meet emissions. maybe not for high production vehicles like the Z06/ZL1?
I think the cutoff line for 'high volume' is around 50 units, over the total run. Even the worst sales expectations for the Z/28 would be 10x that.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2016, 08:30 AM   #204
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
So I still don't see a true 100% unique engine for the Z/28. The Grand Sport did not get one, the Z06 still using the LT4. The rumored ZR1 might be powered by the rumored LT5 which might also power the rumored mid engine Zora. The LT5 I would guess is going to have a power adder on it.

So I still stand by my guess of a tweaked LT1 ala LS1 to LS6
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT View Post
Lets keep it simple. ..
it has more power...its available power is like a set kof double Ds (no matter where your face is... theyre everywhere) it has the suspension to mame it matter...(
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2016, 09:32 AM   #205
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaffe View Post
So I still don't see a true 100% unique engine for the Z/28. The Grand Sport did not get one, the Z06 still using the LT4. The rumored ZR1 might be powered by the rumored LT5 which might also power the rumored mid engine Zora. The LT5 I would guess is going to have a power adder on it.

So I still stand by my guess of a tweaked LT1 ala LS1 to LS6
I really have to wonder if they didn't give the GS more power because it would get too close to the Z06.

Either way, I think an LT6 making 530-550 hp would be perfect for the Z/28.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2016, 09:49 AM   #206
2SSRS@Gen5diy
 
2SSRS@Gen5diy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Z/28 #82+#192, 18ZLE 66Nova
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: By the lake in AZ
Posts: 15,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
I really have to wonder if they didn't give the GS more power because it would get too close to the Z06.

Either way, I think an LT6 making 530-550 hp would be perfect for the Z/28.
That is a bit low, hope to see 565 HP, in keeping with the same gap from the LSA to LS7 in the last GEN
2SSRS@Gen5diy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2016, 10:20 AM   #207
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,372
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2SSRS@Gen5diy View Post
That is a bit low, hope to see 565 HP, in keeping with the same gap from the LSA to LS7 in the last GEN
I was thinking the opposite, that 530 feels a bit high for a factory NA 6.2L small bock.

If they were to go out to 7ish litres, then I can see 565 happening. But thats no longer an 'LT6'-type engine like what Shaffe & Bhobbs were talking about.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2016, 10:34 AM   #208
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
I was thinking the opposite, that 530 feels a bit high for a factory NA 6.2L small bock.

If they were to go out to 7ish litres, then I can see 565 happening. But thats no longer an 'LT6'-type engine like what Shaffe & Bhobbs were talking about.
The LS1 was 350 hp, I believe. The LS6 ended up at 405 hp. That's an increase of about 16%. If you apply that to the LT1, that end up around 526 hp. Is there a 16% increase in the LTx 6.2 liter while staying emissions compliant? I sure hope so.

That's the only reason I've thrown out the 530 hp number. Well, that and it's 4 more than the Voodoo.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2016, 10:51 AM   #209
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,372
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
The LS1 was 350 hp, I believe. The LS6 ended up at 405 hp. That's an increase of about 16%. If you apply that to the LT1, that end up around 526 hp. Is there a 16% increase in the LTx 6.2 liter while staying emissions compliant? I sure hope so.

That's the only reason I've thrown out the 530 hp number. Well, that and it's 4 more than the Voodoo.
Fair enough. I think I was projecting off of the early run LS6s that were 385 hp (vs the 400 of the latter ones).

455 x 385/350 = 500.5
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2016, 01:11 PM   #210
ChevyRules

 
Drives: 2021 Tesla Model 3 LR
Join Date: May 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicul15 View Post

i thought they already said the LTx 7.0 didn't meet emissions. maybe not for high production vehicles like the Z06/ZL1?
That statement was in relation to the Z06. They couldn't remain emission compliant for a 640 HP 7.0 liter NA V8. If all they wanted to do was produce a ~550 HP 7.0 LTx, they probably could get it to hit emission requirements.
ChevyRules is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.