Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction Discussions


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-30-2017, 02:34 AM   #1
RideZX6R
Probably tired right now
 
RideZX6R's Avatar
 
Drives: 1Lap1LE | EV6 FE | 18 F150
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: At the office (CLT, NC)
Posts: 1,133
Approx ceiling of fueling component...

Has anyone posted a list of approx whp limit (ballpark) with each component added to fuel system?

IE... whp limit for...
  • Stock LT1 fuel system
  • low pressure pump only
  • add cam fuel lobe and lash cap only
  • add lt4 fuel pump only
  • add lt4 injectors only

Obviously we can add combos... but I know if folks could do just the cam lob or just the lash cap for their needs - they'd stop there.
__________________
-Seven
'17 SS 1LE - 1LAP 1LE (Now with more 427!)
'18 F150 Platinum Powerstroke diesel
'22 Kia EV6 First Edition
'18 RS3 (1 of 2) Cumulus Blue
'24 911 T (ordered)

Formers...
'19 RS5 Sportback Sonoma Green | '07 Cayman S 6MT | '16 Audi S3 Prestige Viper Green (APR Stage 3+) | '19 Mustang Shelby GT350R | '17 SS 1LE MBM 575whp all-motor

Last edited by RideZX6R; 04-30-2017 at 07:53 PM.
RideZX6R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 06:44 AM   #2
wnta1ss

 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NH
Posts: 1,692
You forgot to mention the low pressure pump. The supply is the basis of your system and if it's not up to the task, then all of the parts you put on the engine are moot.

As far as lash cap, they should only be used to compensate for the lower base circle of an aftermarket camshaft's fuel lobe. If you stick 1 on with a normal cam lobe you are just preloading the hpfp. Guys have broken the high pressure pumps off the engine pulling this stunt.
wnta1ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 07:53 PM   #3
RideZX6R
Probably tired right now
 
RideZX6R's Avatar
 
Drives: 1Lap1LE | EV6 FE | 18 F150
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: At the office (CLT, NC)
Posts: 1,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by wnta1ss View Post
You forgot to mention the low pressure pump. The supply is the basis of your system and if it's not up to the task, then all of the parts you put on the engine are moot.

As far as lash cap, they should only be used to compensate for the lower base circle of an aftermarket camshaft's fuel lobe. If you stick 1 on with a normal cam lobe you are just preloading the hpfp. Guys have broken the high pressure pumps off the engine pulling this stunt.
Edited the list for you... Are you able to answer now?
__________________
-Seven
'17 SS 1LE - 1LAP 1LE (Now with more 427!)
'18 F150 Platinum Powerstroke diesel
'22 Kia EV6 First Edition
'18 RS3 (1 of 2) Cumulus Blue
'24 911 T (ordered)

Formers...
'19 RS5 Sportback Sonoma Green | '07 Cayman S 6MT | '16 Audi S3 Prestige Viper Green (APR Stage 3+) | '19 Mustang Shelby GT350R | '17 SS 1LE MBM 575whp all-motor
RideZX6R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 08:22 PM   #4
DevBlackSS
 
DevBlackSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS M6
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Houston
Posts: 206
Those are a set of tough questions there
Interested to see the answers also
__________________
715whp/665tq
DevBlackSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 09:06 PM   #5
travislambert

 
travislambert's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 ZL1
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Fairmont, WV
Posts: 1,558
This doesn't answer all of your questions, but I do have some related experience.

- I made over 600 RWHP and 650 RWTQ on a stock SS fuel low-pressure pump and an LT4 crate engine. The low-pressure pump never even came close to having a problem (logged with HP tuners).

- The stock LT1 high-pressure system taps out at about 600 RWHP. That's why you see the guys with LT1 and an LT4 supercharger underdrive the supercharger a little bit.

- The LT4 high-pressure system is good for at least 700 RWHP.
travislambert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 09:54 PM   #6
mariojmoe
Account Suspended
 
Drives: C7 Z06 manual, 18 Zl1 manual, etc
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Spring Texas
Posts: 1,488
I am using the lt4 hpfp, 2017 Zl1 lpfp, lt4 injectors, and aftermarket cam to help out as well. I should know where this taps out tomorrow or day after (at a new shop and tuner). I am also running a 2.38 upper and 9.0 lower ud pulley system.
mariojmoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2017, 10:14 AM   #7
EDFHOBBIES
Dyno Show Queen LOL
 
EDFHOBBIES's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 SS & 17 ZL1 Both Yellow
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,345
Send a message via Skype™ to EDFHOBBIES
Buddy has a Zl1 his road to modification are as follows... might help w some info..

Zl1 baseline dyno 551 to the wheels stock psi
ZL1 tune, 1 dwn smaller pulley, and headers 580 on 93 and 630 on e77 out of fuel high side
ZL1 Cam added with better fuel lobe 685 8# e77
ZL1 w all above meth 725 13# e77

The low side is requiring a aux pump now... to go further..


this was a race with my friend he was on ZL1 w tune, 1 dwn smaller pulley, e85/e77 when he was stock vs me the Eforce has the advantage.. I doubt it would be close now he can keep up with my TT now.


__________________


Kong Ported 2650, Crawford Racing Port Injection, Weapon X 112mm Adapter, NW112mm TB, Livernois Ported LT4 Heads, Lingenfelter GT32 stealth cam, Haltech Elite, and Carbon by Trufiber

Last edited by EDFHOBBIES; 05-03-2017 at 10:29 AM.
EDFHOBBIES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 10:15 AM   #8
ProCharger
 
Drives: Many C7's
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 573
Filled in my .02
  • Stock LT1 fuel system
    (580-620rwhp)



  • low pressure pump only
    (580-650rwhp)



  • add cam fuel lobe and lash cap only
    (forget the "cap" unless you want headaches, and won't do any good without some sort of LPFP support)

  • add lt4 fuel pump only
    (580-620, won't do you much good with out LPFP support)


  • add lt4 injectors only
    (580-620, injectors aren't the issue... would need HPFP and LPFP support)


You would need to do a combo like....
Upgraded LPFP (or BAP) and LT4 HPFP
Then you will have full fuel pressure on the low side, and plenty on the highside. Until you run out of LT4 HPFP.....

Then comes your next steps.


But again, as I have stated each car/truck is different.
Some run out of LPFP first, others run out of HPFP first.
Its best to take it to a tuner that knows them inside and out, and purchase parts for what YOUR car needs. (Unless you just wanna throw it all at it, but thats kinda pricy)
ProCharger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 10:18 AM   #9
ProCharger
 
Drives: Many C7's
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by travislambert View Post

- The LT4 high-pressure system is good for at least 700 RWHP.
With LT4 injectors, LT4 HPFP, and good intake pump....
I have made 732 rwhp before it ran out. (procharged)

But then a few months later one ran out at 666 rwhp (not kidding on the number, and it was roots blown)
Because it had a HPFP that just wants as good as the last LT4 HPFP.

So I would say the range that I have personally seen in 666rwhp-732rwhp
ProCharger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2017, 01:12 AM   #10
RideZX6R
Probably tired right now
 
RideZX6R's Avatar
 
Drives: 1Lap1LE | EV6 FE | 18 F150
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: At the office (CLT, NC)
Posts: 1,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProCharger View Post
Filled in my .02
  • Stock LT1 fuel system
    (580-620rwhp)



  • low pressure pump only
    (580-650rwhp)



  • add cam fuel lobe and lash cap only
    (forget the "cap" unless you want headaches, and won't do any good without some sort of LPFP support)

  • add lt4 fuel pump only
    (580-620, won't do you much good with out LPFP support)


  • add lt4 injectors only
    (580-620, injectors aren't the issue... would need HPFP and LPFP support)


You would need to do a combo like....
Upgraded LPFP (or BAP) and LT4 HPFP
Then you will have full fuel pressure on the low side, and plenty on the highside. Until you run out of LT4 HPFP.....

Then comes your next steps.


But again, as I have stated each car/truck is different.
Some run out of LPFP first, others run out of HPFP first.
Its best to take it to a tuner that knows them inside and out, and purchase parts for what YOUR car needs. (Unless you just wanna throw it all at it, but thats kinda pricy)
I really appreciate this info. Would it be safe to assume the above numbers are with pump gas in mind, and E85 would change things?


For my personal car... heads/cam/E85 is probably the name of the game.
However it'll be a little odd, 5.3L Gen5 ported heads and then a specifically matched cam. Ideally the velocity the 5.3L heads will create should make the mid-range more powerful than 6.2L ported heads, but both would make similar power at high RPM. (basically the theory some folks have, myself included is that 6.2L heads might be a bit too big at lower rpms for anything other the FI applications, which I will not have - but realize this forum is the place to ask fueling questions).
__________________
-Seven
'17 SS 1LE - 1LAP 1LE (Now with more 427!)
'18 F150 Platinum Powerstroke diesel
'22 Kia EV6 First Edition
'18 RS3 (1 of 2) Cumulus Blue
'24 911 T (ordered)

Formers...
'19 RS5 Sportback Sonoma Green | '07 Cayman S 6MT | '16 Audi S3 Prestige Viper Green (APR Stage 3+) | '19 Mustang Shelby GT350R | '17 SS 1LE MBM 575whp all-motor
RideZX6R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2017, 06:55 AM   #11
travislambert

 
travislambert's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 ZL1
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Fairmont, WV
Posts: 1,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProCharger View Post
With LT4 injectors, LT4 HPFP, and good intake pump....
I have made 732 rwhp before it ran out. (procharged)

But then a few months later one ran out at 666 rwhp (not kidding on the number, and it was roots blown)
Because it had a HPFP that just wants as good as the last LT4 HPFP.

So I would say the range that I have personally seen in 666rwhp-732rwhp
Good to know. Thank You!
travislambert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2017, 09:30 AM   #12
ProCharger
 
Drives: Many C7's
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by RideZX6R View Post
I really appreciate this info. Would it be safe to assume the above numbers are with pump gas in mind, and E85 would change things?
E85 adds the stress of having to move more volume.
So take 15-30% off the numbers I posted, depending on the content % you run
ProCharger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2017, 09:58 AM   #13
jessrayo
Speed Freak
 
jessrayo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Camaro, 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ardmore, OK
Posts: 2,637
This is what I saw on my car. It has a twin turbo system so it will have slight differences than the superchargers.


  • Stock LT1 fuel system - 566whp (91 octane)
  • low pressure pump only - 653whp (91 octane)
  • add lt4 fuel pump only - In a detailed engineering report on direct injection from GM they specifically stated that their DI fuel injectors are designed to best atomize the fuel at specific pressures related to the corresponding GM mechanical fuel pump so they did not recommend swapping the lt4 pump or injectors individually but rather treat them as a combined unit. GM and other tuners have noted that at the extreme upper limits the injectors may not fully atomize the fuel and it may begin to "wash" the cylinder giving false air/fuel readings. I swapped both together and went to 758whp using 110 octane. The high compression lt1 engine was not allowing much improvement with this "extra lt4 fuel and boost capacity" on pump gas due to increased knock with the corresponding increased boost. Had to go to race gas to use the lt4 mechanical fuel pump potential.
I currently keep my car tuned to 650ish and run pump 91. There is a lot more potential running e85 because of its resistance to knock but it is not readily available in my area of the country.

I feel if you want to go much above 650 you really need to change the pistons and if I was swapping pistons I would reduce the compression ratio to allow more usable boost at pump gas octane levels.
__________________
2016 SS -AGP twin Borg Warner 7163 EFR's, LT4 mechanical pump, LT4 injectors, Walbro 255 low side, Castrol SRF. 734whp/759 tq

2013 ZL1 -ADM - 427 LSX 6 bolt, O-ringed block built by LME. Twin PT6466 turbos. RPM custom manual trans, RPS Quad carbon clutch, 9" Hendrix rear diff & axles. ADM/squash fuel system, Ron Davis radiator, Spal fans, AGP air to air, turbo plumbing. LPE oil cooler, rear bushing upgrade, roll bar...etc. rwhp 1400+... 212.5mph, best Texas mile to date.
jessrayo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2017, 09:15 AM   #14
PRAY


 
PRAY's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
Good read. Anyone care to comment on where they think a ZL1 in tank and 32% fuel lobe will be maxed out at with the stock LT1 injectors and High side pump?
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
PRAY is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.