03-29-2015, 11:33 AM | #1 |
I love the LS3
Drives: 2010 IOM 2SS Manual Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Washington NC
Posts: 361
|
Shelby GT350R faster than Z/28?
Ive just read that the new 2016 Shelby Ford Mustang GT350R has beat the Camaro Z/28 Nurburgring's lap time by 5 seconds!!! Z/28 (7:37) vs GT350R (7:32). How did this happen? When did mustangs begin to corner. I know there must be some secrets as to how they did it but Chevy needs to step up there game and get the '16 model Z/28 over the top. Either way im no mustang fan but thats fast. (per AutoBlog article)
|
03-29-2015, 11:37 AM | #2 |
|
Old News.. The Z/28 lap was on partially wet pavement..
__________________
Modifications
GM Dark Tail Lights / 3rd Brake Light & Reflectors | LED Reverse Lights | Diode Dynamics Side Markers | Borla "ATAK" Cat Back Exhaust |
03-29-2015, 11:37 AM | #3 |
Drives: 4 wheels Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: anyplace, USA
Posts: 1,177
|
Link?
|
03-29-2015, 11:43 AM | #4 |
I love the LS3
Drives: 2010 IOM 2SS Manual Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Washington NC
Posts: 361
|
Im no good at links but google Shelby GT350R and it will pop up several reports on this. Ford/Shelby must have been working dark magic to set a time like that.
|
03-29-2015, 11:45 AM | #5 |
Buick 455 Fan
Drives: 1970 Buick, 2012 1SS LS3 Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 5,957
|
Nurburgring times are great. Not infallible but great. Even F1 drivers sometimes do not give consistent laps on two separate dates on the same track.
The Z/28 and the GT350 tear it up. This is good news.
__________________
|
03-29-2015, 11:52 AM | #6 |
I love the LS3
Drives: 2010 IOM 2SS Manual Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Washington NC
Posts: 361
|
Very true. This mustang maybe good but I wont be getting rid of my Camaro anytime soon.
|
03-29-2015, 12:25 PM | #7 |
Drives: 2012 2SS LS3 Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: The Garage
Posts: 561
|
The only thing this says to me is that it's a great time for cars. All this will do is create more and better competition, and in the end we're (the consumers) the ones that win!
Last edited by SteelCamaro; 03-29-2015 at 12:35 PM. |
03-29-2015, 12:25 PM | #8 |
Drives: RS Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,037
|
When MT puts both cars on Willow Springs on the same day we will really know which one is faster.
|
03-29-2015, 12:30 PM | #9 |
Buick 455 Fan
Drives: 1970 Buick, 2012 1SS LS3 Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 5,957
|
They gotta swap drivers and do it again
__________________
|
03-29-2015, 12:38 PM | #10 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2015 Redhot 1LE Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 1,409
|
I have no problem with gt350 being faster than gen5 z28...now gen6 z28 is going to be another story
|
03-29-2015, 12:45 PM | #11 |
Drives: 2018 Audi TT RS Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Navarre, Florida
Posts: 1,915
|
I love Mustangs, as I'm sure that's no surprise but, regardless of which one is faster around a track or down a drag strip is irrelevant. The vast majority of us will never own either and if we did, the likelihood of said vehicles remaining factory stock is almost nil, rendering the comparisons moot. These are good baseline benchmarks to gauge where you might potentially end up in the pecking order but by no means should they be used as an ultimate judge of real world performance when you factor in road conditions, temperature, drivers, tires, etc. Even if all things were equal and one vehicle inevitably prevails over another, all it provides is a small token towards bragging rights.
In comparison, the 03-04 Cobras and C5Z's are by no means the pinnacle of performance but, neither one are anything to scoff at, especially when modding beings. Stock, they're both quick vehicles and their presence commands respect but in comparison to today's vehicles, they're outclassed; see one of these modified on the street and you're likely to pause for a moment thinking about the potential to get brutalized. I don't know why so much emphasis is placed on how vehicles perform from the factory when the vast majority of us would modify the car in the first place.
__________________
2018 Audi TT ▊RS
2.4X 0-60, 1.6X 60', 120+mph 1/8th, 4.XX 60-130, 150+mph traps on 255/35/18 R888R tires on the street (unprepped). 2019 Audi RS3 About as fast as the TT RS 2019 Camaro ZL1 1LE Sold 2018 Camaro SS 1LE Sold 2019 Corvette Z06 Sold 2021 Charger Hellcat Redeye Widebody Sold |
03-29-2015, 12:45 PM | #12 |
Drives: pleather and Chiclets Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: a line somwhere
Posts: 4,206
|
Link? Article? Source?
A time reported a while ago was a HOAX.
__________________
|
03-29-2015, 12:55 PM | #13 |
Drives: 2012 SS Camaro L99 Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: California
Posts: 187
|
a few things.
From what i've read, the people that published this time are notorious for skewing numbers (they use math equations to come up with the times based off older models and other track ratios for the Z06). Also from what I understand, Ford doesn't publish Ring times, so most of these numbers are going to be 'just' to beat the z/28's times Another thing, It wouldn't quite make sense for Ford to come out with a mustang that is track ready and not beat the z/28's time considering the later release date. even though these two represent the same category, the 350r is a little more extreme than the z/28, for starters, z/28 has the back seats, gt350r does not - if we didn't want to waste our time with back seats, a corvette would definitely be more optimal. as for the 'rain' time, yes, we all know it was raining, however GM had plenty of time to come up with a better time for release if they could have. i've read articles where they claim they have about 6 seconds of time to be shaved off of the z/28's lap time, however, without video and without them releasing that as a new official time, i don't see a reason to believe it. Think about it, if you wanted to show boat your new track performance time, are you going to give your 2nd best time, or the absolute best time you guys have been able to achieve. Last, the weather on the Ring from what i've read (i say this a lot), is hardly ever 100% shine. just my 2 cents |
03-29-2015, 12:57 PM | #14 |
|
That claimed time was fabricated by Horsepowerkings.com They also claim the Z06 ran a sub 7-minute lap. No evidence of either "record" time ever materialized and no source was ever named. Nothing but click bait.
__________________
2012 - Present: 2011 CTS-V Sedan, A6, Airaid, Zmax TB and Tune by R.P.M. = 535 hp/503 lb-ft.
2009 - 2012: 2010 2SS RS IBM M6, MGW Shifter, BMR Trailing Arms/Tunnel Brace, Roto-Fab CAI, VMAX Ported TB, Kooks 6511-Complete (Headers, X-Pipe, Mufflers), dyno tuned by R.P.M. = 415 hp/412 lb-ft. "Not giving a f*^k is truly the greatest luxury, and no luxury car gives fewer f*^k's than a CTS-V." - Matt Hardigree |
|
|
|
|