|
|
#113 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 V6 RS Camaro 6MT Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,102
|
Ha this guy is getting slaughtered on Mustang6g - sounds like he is registered there but hasn't posted. Too bad it wasn't thePill. That would have been too perfect.
Quote:
__________________
Summit White 2LT RS V6 ZN2 NPP m6 khalihari interior. Order placed 9/26/15 - Picked up 12/17/15!
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
Z2M
Drives: Oxford White 2014 Mustang GT Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: ATX
Posts: 124
|
At least those kiddos won't like mustangs growing up. as one of them tried to kill them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
![]() Drives: 16 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: AZ
Posts: 224
|
Pre 2015 mustangs didnt have rear independent suspension and handled AWFUL when going around corners with any kind of moderate speed - I know because I had a 2014 GT with 700HP. I however would never attempt that when others are around - stupid.
2015 and up mustang models are far superior to their predecessors in handling and control. The Camaro is just a better all around car however IMO and Ive tried all the Dodges, Fords, Nissan and Chevys muscle cars. Last edited by DisturbedSS; 10-08-2016 at 03:50 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#116 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
|
Quote:
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtqT56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#117 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,241
|
Quote:
And no...the SRA Mustangs didn't handle AWFUL when going around corners, I've driven my fair share of them. Would they get unsettled when hitting a bump or uneven road at speed in a corner? Sure..most cars will. The numerous clips of Mustangs wiping out are because they're cheap and have a lot of power for the dollar value, and people likely didn't step up slowly...IE going from a 260 HP SN95, to a 300 HP S197, then a 400+ 5.0 S197...they go right from a Focus to a Mustang. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#118 | |
|
Sure, why not?
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, Jeep JKU Rubicon Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SE Mass
Posts: 1,538
|
Quote:
__________________
This is that witty and clever statement that makes you chuckle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#119 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,791
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#120 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 SIM 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 5,902
|
Quote:
__________________
2011 2SS/RS built 8/24/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#121 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#122 | |
![]() Drives: 16 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: AZ
Posts: 224
|
Quote:
The Mustang I speak of was 700HP...and I do have curved track experience. It was HP overkill, but as far as handling goes, the 2014 and earlier model GTs were using an outdated rear setup (whether stang owners admit it or not) - the new IRS was proof it needed to catch up with what everyone else already had. I grew up on Mustangs and still have a soft spot for anything Shelby. If people dont think the newer stangs handle better, then they have no experience to compare against and are just posting out their rear. Its night and day difference. Id venture to say Ive had far more Mustangs over my lifespan than the mass majority. Independent testing still shows that Camaros can handle better even on the new 2017s. Its not my opinion, its others far more knowledgeable than myself. Both cars have different strengths, so not meant as a pissing match on which car is better. Ask a Mustang owner to drive a Camaro and he/she will go blind from lack of visibility - just trying to even up the insults.
Last edited by DisturbedSS; 10-08-2016 at 03:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#123 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
|
Quote:
Either way, even the solid axle S197 cars were generally seen as better performers than the IRS 5th gen camaros until the 5th gen suspension was revised.
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtqT56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#124 | |
![]() Drives: 16 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: AZ
Posts: 224
|
Quote:
The solid axle setup was the most complained about item in the Mustang forums, so Im hardly alone in that thought. If Im doing my yearly curved track run, it will be in the better handling Camaro. Search the web for head to head comparisons - Camaro is picked every time over Mustang for the 2016-17 model years. Just relaying what I saw. People get all testy over car comparisons....do the research yourself! Last edited by DisturbedSS; 10-08-2016 at 04:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm almost more disgusted by the reaction of the crowd and the mob mentality that follows than by the idiot driver endangering lives...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#126 | |
![]() Drives: 16 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: AZ
Posts: 224
|
Quote:
Feel free to do the research online, they all pick the 16-17 Camaro over the Mustang in most categories. Just relaying the consensus without personal opinion. Camaro was placed in the 10 best cars in general as well. And yes, it was a typo - 2014 - I discussed my personal experience with a previous 700HP Mustang that was nothing like an off the lot daisy. Isnt this a Camaro forum? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|