The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-14-2014, 08:51 AM   #85
87GNX

 
87GNX's Avatar
 
Drives: Alot
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Norcalifas
Posts: 1,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mwalterhouse View Post
The styling does nothing for me.
It might grow on you..I dont like it either but it might with a refresh. The 2011-2012 Mustangs did nothing for me till the 2013's...they nailed that one. The 2014 Camaro is a step back in looks imo.
87GNX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 10:46 AM   #86
bobby35ny


 
bobby35ny's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 ZL1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South East, FL
Posts: 3,023
I think we will be behind in the HP wars for a long time. Takes years to R&D an engine program. Chevy is still married to pushrod V-8's at this time.
-Bobby
__________________
2017 ZL1 M6 Bog City, 2013 ZL1 M6, 2010 2SS M6
ZL1::J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS
bobby35ny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 12:44 PM   #87
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobby35ny View Post
I think we will be behind in the HP wars for a long time. Takes years to R&D an engine program. Chevy is still married to pushrod V-8's at this time.
-Bobby
It has nothing to do with push rods. It has everything to do with GM building an engine and then never upgrading it. Not to mention the fact that everyone and their mother knows the LT1 will be in the SS Camaro and will make 450 horsepower or less. Ford and Dodge have both modified their engines to increase power over time. I don't understand why GM refuses to do the same thing.
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 12:54 PM   #88
Camaro_Corvette
36.58625, -121.7568
 
Camaro_Corvette's Avatar
 
Drives: Team 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
It has nothing to do with push rods. It has everything to do with GM building an engine and then never upgrading it. Not to mention the fact that everyone and their mother knows the LT1 will be in the SS Camaro and will make 450 horsepower or less. Ford and Dodge have both modified their engines to increase power over time. I don't understand why GM refuses to do the same thing.
Agreed. We don't need a slide rule to figure out what the Camaro will get in the 6th gen. Unless the LT1 is getting a horsepower bump for 2016 (which wouldn't surprise me at all from GM) We will see Corvette engines tuned for a Camaro specs/weights/mpg configuration.
__________________
I am seriously never serious vv V vv Next order of business
Camaro_Corvette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 01:11 PM   #89
bobby35ny


 
bobby35ny's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 ZL1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South East, FL
Posts: 3,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
It has nothing to do with push rods. It has everything to do with GM building an engine and then never upgrading it. Not to mention the fact that everyone and their mother knows the LT1 will be in the SS Camaro and will make 450 horsepower or less. Ford and Dodge have both modified their engines to increase power over time. I don't understand why GM refuses to do the same thing.
Push rods are the limitation here, they only can get so much out of it them MPG suffers. LS3 to LT1, 25HP increase? That's pretty sad. With the HP wars in progress, we need much more than that.
-bobby
__________________
2017 ZL1 M6 Bog City, 2013 ZL1 M6, 2010 2SS M6
ZL1::J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS
bobby35ny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 01:26 PM   #90
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobby35ny View Post
Push rods are the limitation here, they only can get so much out of it them MPG suffers. LS3 to LT1, 25HP increase? That's pretty sad. With the HP wars in progress, we need much more than that.
-bobby
The 392 is a push rod engine. I don't see anyone complaining that it makes 485 horsepower.

Seems like the stock LT1 tune leaves a lot on the table.

Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 01:37 PM   #91
Silverlsinva


 
Silverlsinva's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Fiat 500 Abarth Grigio
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Manassas, Va
Posts: 3,124
392 also has Gas Guzzler tax as well.
Silverlsinva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 01:39 PM   #92
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobby35ny View Post
Push rods are the limitation here, they only can get so much out of it them MPG suffers. LS3 to LT1, 25HP increase? That's pretty sad. With the HP wars in progress, we need much more than that.
-bobby
You need to do your homework. The LT1 is a great engine and would put the 5.0 in its place.

The LT1 makes a ton more power under the curve as compared to the LS3, not to mention it makes 460 HP in the Corvette with the performance exhaust....not 450.

Nothing more than a tune unleashes another 25 - 30 HP. Headers puts you well over 500.

So in the end we get an engine with a crap ton of low end torque, with a nice top end capable of 500+ HP with a few basic mods. What more do you want?
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 01:51 PM   #93
bobby35ny


 
bobby35ny's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 ZL1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South East, FL
Posts: 3,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
You need to do your homework. The LT1 is a great engine and would put the 5.0 in its place.

The LT1 makes a ton more power under the curve as compared to the LS3, not to mention it makes 460 HP in the Corvette with the performance exhaust....not 450.

Nothing more than a tune unleashes another 25 - 30 HP. Headers puts you well over 500.

So in the end we get an engine with a crap ton of low end torque, with a nice top end capable of 500+ HP with a few basic mods. What more do you want?
Your misunderstanding me and I'm talking stock for stock not modding.
450 or 460 or 475 is not going to do it in the next 3 yrs with the HP wars going on right now.

-Bobby
__________________
2017 ZL1 M6 Bog City, 2013 ZL1 M6, 2010 2SS M6
ZL1::J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS
bobby35ny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 01:57 PM   #94
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobby35ny View Post
Your misunderstanding me and I'm talking stock for stock not modding.
450 or 460 or 475 is not going to do it in the next 3 yrs with the HP wars going on right now.

-Bobby
I get what you are saying and I agree but it is what it is and that's what GM has given us.

I did read that the redline for the new 5.0 hasn't changed so it will be interesting to see where it's power ends up. The BOSS made 444 at, what, 7,500 rpm? With the 5.0 not revving that high, I don't see how it will surpass it. It seems like Ford is trying to maximize low end torque knowing the LT1 will decimate the 5.0 there.
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 03:13 PM   #95
khell86
 
Drives: 2012 Ford Focus
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 394
The LT1 is definitely a beast in regards to torque, but gearing can even the game up some. The GT is a prime example of it. The MT-82 is geared perfectly for the 5.0's power band.
khell86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 03:45 PM   #96
87GNX

 
87GNX's Avatar
 
Drives: Alot
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Norcalifas
Posts: 1,336
The 2nd gen 5.0 will get charge motion control valves that will produce the lower end torque that the coyote presently doesnt generate.. I dont think the lt1 will decimate the 5.0 whatsoever. The 5.0 will get d.i in 2016, making close to 470+ hp...Gm will need to make sure the next camaro isn't a fat pig like it is now ( I had a 2011), the game is going to get very interesting in a year or so. Gearing is going to be crucial in both of these.
87GNX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 03:49 PM   #97
87GNX

 
87GNX's Avatar
 
Drives: Alot
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Norcalifas
Posts: 1,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
You need to do your homework. The LT1 is a great engine and would put the 5.0 in its place.

The LT1 makes a ton more power under the curve as compared to the LS3, not to mention it makes 460 HP in the Corvette with the performance exhaust....not 450.

Nothing more than a tune unleashes another 25 - 30 HP. Headers puts you well over 500.

So in the end we get an engine with a crap ton of low end torque, with a nice top end capable of 500+ HP with a few basic mods. What more do you want?
You can get 500 crank hp right now from a coyote with a CJ intake, headers, tune, tb, x pipe cat delete, and a few other boltons (over 500 with phase 3 cams). Its that easy. If the mustang weighed a much as a c7, this would really show of these awesome motors.
87GNX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 03:51 PM   #98
87GNX

 
87GNX's Avatar
 
Drives: Alot
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Norcalifas
Posts: 1,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by khell86 View Post
The LT1 is definitely a beast in regards to torque, but gearing can even the game up some. The GT is a prime example of it. The MT-82 is geared perfectly for the 5.0's power band.
So is the a6. The a6 is faster than the mt 82 when tuned.
87GNX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.