|
|
#57 | |
![]() Drives: 01 Z06 08 CTS 07 Avy LTZ Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 404
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
![]() Drives: 01 Z06 08 CTS 07 Avy LTZ Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 404
|
Quote:
R & D and design spread out all across the world. We Americans need to stop bashing our own and get back to the pride and values that make this such a great place to live. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
![]() Drives: 01 Z06 08 CTS 07 Avy LTZ Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 404
|
Quote:
Last edited by Nickdago; 07-03-2008 at 02:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
![]() Drives: 2004 GTO Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 448
|
GM going out of business is nonsense. Chrysler will go long before GM does. They are already tapping into a line of credit from Daimler just to stay alive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS 6MT Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,361
|
Oil is, and I believe will forever be, the single most versitile commodity ever discovered. For those of you who think it will go away or want it to go away, it ain't happening. Not now, not 5 years from now, not in the 25th century. All these pipe dreams of cars running on puppie smiles and granola bars are just wasted time. We are wasting time not utilizing our own supply. We need to start using what we have that we haven't even tapped yet, and do whatever is necessary to keep the supply ample, affordable, and consistent.
If my point of view on this freaks you out, too bad. You don't have to own a car if you don't want to. But, as the last time I checked I still have the right to own whatever car I want, I want my Camaro with a V8. A V8 that I will drive 25,000/yr, and I don't think it's unreasonable to ask for cheap gas since there's enough to go around if we just use it. I've already written to my state and federal representatives that I will no longer vote for anyone against drilling for oil and lots of it. Including every currently forbidden location that is still on USA soil. This shouldn't be a liberal vs. conservative issue - this should be an issue for America, if you want prosperity and a continuation of our freedoms to enjoy this country the way Henry Ford envisioned, you should be in support of using our oil no matter what party you affiliate yourself with. Oil makes the economy move forward, it keeps our production going, it keeps product moving from coast to coast, it affects everything we do. All this alternative engergy stuff is just increasing research costs. Cars like the Volt are a good idea as an experiment, but you gonna try to put that kind of logic into a semi truck to pull 10 tons 3,000 miles in a week? Efficienctly? With the ability to run a million miles before you have to do major work on the system? Just wasted time researching it. The diesel and internal combustion engines might be old in concept, but they're absolutely the best way to do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
Yankee ingenuity led us more to where we are than the versatility of oil. Oil is a great resource; don't get me wrong. I'd love to see some lab synthesize it so that we could use combustion engines forever, assuming that we do someday run out—apparently a big assumption in some people's perspective. I'd rather be innovative than predictably reliant on the system in place before me. Do I want a V8? Of course I do. Do I want a powerful electric car? That would be sick. I don't care what kind of power I have. If it drives fast and well, I want it in my garage. I'm a power enthusiast. You can call electrics anything you want, but if someone can innovate a powerful battery car that beats whatever is beside me on the track, I'm pretty happy. The issue isn't oil. The issue is innovation. You can't tell me that investing in a new idea is a waste. That's how we all got computers to visit this site and how cars got built in the first place. I like new ideas that guide us in new directions. And if someone can build a car that runs on puppy smiles, I want to try it out, not because I'm some hippie out to save the world with hemp and conservationism but because it's efficient and less costly to operate. Then I can spend my remaining resources on whatever else I want, including my muscle car.
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Future 2011 camaro convertible Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,256
|
Quote:
if you get rid of the speculators the speculating will just move to other countries...it wouldn't change anything and everybody speculates...when you go and buy products on sale and you buy more than usual...your speculating that the price is going to go up... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
Moderator.ca
|
Quote:
The point is, the concept is robust enough to use in those heavy duty applications. It should be even more reliable than a mechanical drive since there is no transmission or drive shaft to fail and the engine is rarely overworked.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 3,746
|
Quote:
SOME of us live in remote areas and DEPEND on SUV's and Trucks to get us to work or to get food, etc. Please refrain from bashing something that someone else might need. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Moderator
|
I want to point out that my post, while bashing people who don't need large trucks, SUVs, and vans, does not intend to bash everyone who has one. I only wanted to go after those who drive them in the suburbs, never fill the cargo area, and use only a third of the seats. Work trucks and survival trucks are totally different.
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
www.Camaro5store.com
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
![]() |
I seem to recall reading something from a couple of years ago that indicated that declaring bankruptcy might end up being a good thing for GM in the long run, though devastating in the short term. It would be difficult to pull in investors and harm their public image (people would be very reluctant to buy a car from a bankrupt company), but if GM did enter bankruptcy status, it would essentially absolve them of a lot of their legal obligations to franchise owners and unions. They would have far more freedom to restructure the company and their labor force. It'd be drastic, but could allow GM to come out the other end much leaner and meaner.
So while a bankruptcy would be a negative thing, it doesn't mean the end of the company by a long shot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
the nerd king
Drives: 2005 scion xb... Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: phoenix, az
Posts: 426
|
then we could buy even more stock. because it would probably drop to like $4 a share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS 6MT Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,361
|
Somthing else if GM declared bankruptcy: they could use that to shield them from honoring union contracts.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|