The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

View Poll Results: Select the keepers!
Chevrolet 110 79.71%
Buick 64 46.38%
Cadillac 107 77.54%
Pontiac 94 68.12%
Saab 46 33.33%
Saturn 76 55.07%
Hummer 24 17.39%
GMC 68 49.28%
Daewoo 21 15.22%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 138. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-28-2008, 07:57 PM   #57
stovt001


 
stovt001's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaropete View Post
Saturn gives them a low-cost line to compete with the likes of Kia and Hyundai.
Saturns are pricier than Chevrolets. You can't negotiate a lower price either.
__________________
"It's kind of fun to do the impossible" - Walt Disney

There's a great big beautiful tomorrow
shining at the end of every day
There's a great big beautiful tomorrow
Just a dream away
stovt001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008, 07:57 PM   #58
theholycow


 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 GMC Sierra, '80 Lesabre
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: RI
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Blur View Post
I still believe that Hummer is worth keeping, especially if GM eventually acquires Jeep. They can be combined under the Jeep name and offer combined platforms.
That's a great idea but it's only applicable in a whole other world where GM can be buying brands. Right now they need to liquidate stuff and raise some quick cash at the expense of giving up future profits.
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios
2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong)
1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles
2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
she really underestimates the damage i would do to her reproductive organs
http://allOffTopic.com is the place for all the naughty stuff you can't get away with on this forum...
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008, 08:09 PM   #59
stovt001


 
stovt001's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,810
These ideas for keeping brands and giving them a specific purpose sound great, but there are a few problems:

1) The growth of the internet and the information people have easy access to makes it much harder to differentiate a brand. A car company just can't slap a new badge on another brand's car and say it is something completely different. A quick trip to Edmunds or any other car website will let a customer know that whatever they are looking at is just the 20th car built on the Lambda platform and they could get the exact same thing with a Chevy badge for thousands less.

2) GM swore up and down for years that they'd stop badge engineering, and it has only gotten worse. Having GM keep anything more than 3 NA brands (and that is pushing it) is like strapping cartons on cigarettes to someone who is trying to quit.

3) When the primary GM NA hierarchy was formed (Chevy -> Pontiac -> Olds -> Buick -> Caddy) GM practically owned the American market. Ford owned most of the rest, Chrysler had a solid chunk, and everyone else was a footnote. Now GM has no greater market share than Toyota with its 3 brands. There is only room for so many brands in the market and as new ones enter, some have to leave.

4)GM just gave us the Pontiac G3. What makes you think they have any interest in making it a performance brand? Even if they wanted to do a lineup of performance cars, the dealers keep screaming for rebadged Cobalts, Aveos, and Equinoxes. Buick, on the other hand, is sticking perfectly to its brand differentiation.

5) Corporate culture is everything. Saab built its image on quirkiness and Pontiac built its image on rebelliousness. Both of those words perfectly described everything GM corporate culture is NOT.
__________________
"It's kind of fun to do the impossible" - Walt Disney

There's a great big beautiful tomorrow
shining at the end of every day
There's a great big beautiful tomorrow
Just a dream away
stovt001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008, 09:56 PM   #60
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by heaz View Post
drop
Daewoo-useless
buick-crap
and gmc- same as chevy

keep hummer b/c there is nothing else like it
Quote:
Originally Posted by heaz View Post
and drop saturn b/c it is the same as pontaic
Daewoo is GM's bread and butter in most markets outside of North America. Buick is their most reliable line. GMC is their most profitable line. And Saturn is turning into Opel/Vauxhaul of North America. Though saturn does share a lot of platforms with Pontiac too. Because of that, I think that every sporty Saturn (250 hp Aura, 260 hp Sky) should be droped and every eco-Pontiac should likewise be droped (G3, SE anything).

Its the international aspect that makes this soo dificult. While we may not like the Chevy Aveo over here, its twin is very sucessful in Korea and China. Speaking of China, Buick is rated as one of the best brands of car over there. On par with Lexus and BMW. And nothing like Hummer? What about Land Rover?


Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow View Post
GMC and Chevy each sell enough pickup trucks to compete with any other pickup brand alone. If GMC was eliminated, would all the GMC buyers buy Chevy instead and Chevy sell twice as many pickups as anyone else?

That's not a rhetorical question, I'm really not sure why GM's trucks sell so much more (besides the fact that they KICK ASS) but I have to wonder if branding is part of it.
Sierra+Silverado don't sell much more than F series, if any more. But it is quite a way down to Dodge, Toyota, and Nissan.



The other thing is how does GM get rid of these brands? Sell them? Sure they would have lost the cost of rebadging their cars, but they also lose sales to someone else. And killing a brand? That costs billions of dollars. I don't know of a 3rd way to be rid of a brand.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008, 10:08 PM   #61
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,788
I've never been a Buick fan but don't even plan on owning a Saab or Daewoo. It's bad to read something like this but it's for a greater good.
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GM to close 4 factories, may drop Hummer MAC General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 81 08-03-2008 03:02 AM
Hummer HX Concept KILLER74Z28 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 16 01-25-2008 11:25 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.