|
|
#57 | |||
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
Quote:
Hellion "Hellraiser" compund boost setup. Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah I agree, definitely don't want to blow it up lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
SST...
Drives: SST Camaro 2010 Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: East Coast of Florida
Posts: 5,927
|
Hey Garage -
Don't know how I missed this one, but great thread. Camaro vs GT500. A couple of questions about your TT: Is the theory that the factory blower will handle the low end torque and allow time for the turbos to spool, thus allowing a flatter/smoother curve ? Is there any problem with the Eaton overheating with so much compressing going on or does the extra turbo air go thru a bypass ? Don't mean to ask dumb questions, but it's a different technology, so just interested... Should be one heck of a setup and fool a lot of people looking under the hood at the "CAI going to the blower"...heh, heh ![]() That'll be nice to see in April. Plus, you'll be a celebrity with the GT500 amongst so many Camaros... We definitely need to take a picture with about 20 Camaros on either side of your car for you to hang in you Garage... ![]() Take Care. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Account Suspended
|
Yes, your assumption is correct. Up to a certain level of boost (~20lbs) the factory does not present any restriction, so it makes sense to keep it in place. It will certainly help keep the low-end torque in play, but there really is not much lag with the twin 61mm turbonetics units I am going with anyway.
Here's the dyno sheet of a 2008 GT500 that has the same setup as I am putting on my car: ![]() I have not heard of any overheating issues. Not only does the system use the factory intercooler, but it also comes with a second air-to-water intercooler to help keep temps down. I'd be more concerned with blowing out the seals of the blower at high boost levels than I would be things getting cooked. |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
FASTER!
Drives: Challenger Hellcat, 2SS Camaro Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,244
|
So what's the benefit to adding turbos to an already supercharged car rather than just putting a smaller supercharger or crank pulley on the car to generate the boost?
I assume there must be some added benefit or the complexity of the system wouldn't be worth it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
SST...
Drives: SST Camaro 2010 Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: East Coast of Florida
Posts: 5,927
|
Very nice dyno chart. Once you hit 3K rpm, LOOK OUT !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
This is how people with much more experience with turbos and power-adders explained it to me: Let's say that we have a car that makes 1,000 hp peak, but only makes 500 - 1,000 hp for around 3,000 rpm. Now, we have another car that makes 900 hp peak, but makes 500-900 hp for 5,000 rpm. If we use a linear progression of power to calculate the average power through 5,000 RPM, the second car in question would have an average power output of about 700 hp through 5,000 rpm, whereas the first car mentioned would only have an average output of about 550 - 600 hp through 5,000 rpm. Using this equation, the first car in question has a higher peak power output, however the second car will most likely out-accelerate it due to the fact that it makes more average power over the same RPM range. Having already owned a GT500 that made over 700+rwhp at the track, I know all to well how hard it is to launch the car effectively at that power level. While the compound setup may not make any more power than the KB setup did, the way in which that power comes on should only help me get the car out of the hole. That, however, is just a theory that I will only be able to prove at the track. Does that help? Last edited by garagelogic; 10-27-2009 at 11:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
I am the internets.
|
Subscribed
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
gL and hope your theory works out for ya, I'm no gearhead but that makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | ||
|
Truth Enforcer
Drives: anything I can get my hands on Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
|
sweet. keep us updated. is that 17lbs from the turbos or at the manifold?
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise. Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Account Suspended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |||
|
Truth Enforcer
Drives: anything I can get my hands on Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
|
Quote:
sweet. throw a little meth at that beast and turn it up!
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
FASTER!
Drives: Challenger Hellcat, 2SS Camaro Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Account Suspended
|
UPDATE: The system is installed and the car fired right up and settled to idle with no issues at all. it is going up on the rollers this afternoon to begin the tuning process.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| STS Twin Turbo Kits Coming Soon!!! | tbyrne | Forced Induction | 18 | 10-19-2009 11:06 AM |
| 2011 mustang possible Twin turbo V6 | Devil-eyes | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 40 | 03-19-2009 04:00 PM |
| Nelson Twin Turbo LS3 Engines for Camaro | speedster | Forced Induction - V8 | 28 | 03-14-2009 12:37 PM |
| Ford GT Twin Turbo | Aptom | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 44 | 09-20-2007 10:39 PM |