The 2011+ Mustang Thread - Page 408

8cd03gro · 05-30-2010, 07:07 PM

Some mag trapped 116 with an auto. Motorweek? Something like that.

DeathChill · 05-30-2010, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fazm

ok so you only exaggerated 25shot and suspension, and the camaros engine work good to know. lol.

still if it holds on a 200shot, i can promise 9s.

still if money is no object, the more displacement, the better

But the 5.0 did have more than just control arms:

Evolution Performance, Inc. Not many changes tuning wise, still testing! Only suspension changes done is our ultimate suspension kit - upper and lower control arms, panhard bar and torque box braces! No more wheel hop!
April 30 at 5:28pm

I never said it was much.

fazm · 05-30-2010, 10:31 PM

still far from fully optimized drag suspension lol. you can tell from the videos of it running, it jumps every shift.

once they got shocks, springs, solid bushings, etc, its not fully optimized

Blade · 05-30-2010, 10:48 PM

Looks like someone on my floor just got a Mustang. Its a v6 for sure, because I don't see GT anywhere on the car. So how do I tell if its a 2010 or 2011?

ViperTomcat · 05-30-2010, 11:03 PM

A 2011 V6 will have dual pipes and mostly you can tell by the noise.

A 2010 V6 will have a single pipe and will sound horrible.

big hammer · 05-30-2010, 11:07 PM

mph is too high. 60' in relation to ET looks good, but not the trap speed.

THE EVIL TW1N · 05-30-2010, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by big hammer

mph is too high. 60' in relation to ET looks good, but not the trap speed.

you cant extrapolate ET based on 60' times alone. what if the 60' time is whats off? the camaro with long tubes ran 110mph. Is that off as well then?

*mlee* · 05-30-2010, 11:30 PM

That ET is what a Camaro normally runs with LTs... agree those traps on both lanes are high...

305pride · 05-31-2010, 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViperTomcat

A 2011 V6 will have dual pipes and mostly you can tell by the noise.

A 2010 V6 will have a single pipe and will sound horrible.

this. the 2010 v6's have that lame single pipe

wbt · 05-31-2010, 01:50 AM

On the GT...

The rear valance is different.
5.0 on the front fender that replaces the GT emblem.
Wheels are different.
Brembo front brakes.
Silver pony on front grill vs. black for 2010.

SubSolar · 05-31-2010, 02:09 AM

I don't see how the hell it can run 115 mph stock, especially an auto. Most of the sticks in magazine tests have run 110, and Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords which usually always runs the fastest times did 12.6@112 with a stick.

THE EVIL TW1N · 05-31-2010, 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubSolar

I don't see how the hell it can run 115 mph stock, especially an auto. Most of the sticks in magazine tests have run 110, and Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords which usually always runs the fastest times did 12.6@112 with a stick.

what did they run with the auto cuz i dont even think they tried it??

the automatic 5.0 put down 371rwhp and it has different gearing than the manual version so who knows. I see a lot of SRT8 Charger guys run over 108mph trap speeds (ive even seen 110mph quoted) putting down the same power to the wheels and coming in over 600lbs more than the Mustang that has better gearing. Im not saying the clock wasnt messed up maybe it was, but 115mph trap speed is indeed possible and we cant just throw it out because somebody doesnt like it.

wbt · 05-31-2010, 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N

what did they run with the auto cuz i dont even think they tried it??

the automatic 5.0 put down 371rwhp and it has different gearing than the manual version so who knows. I see a lot of SRT8 Charger guys run over 108mph trap speeds (ive even seen 110mph quoted) putting down the same power to the wheels and coming in over 600lbs more than the Mustang that has better gearing. Im not saying the clock wasnt messed up maybe it was, but 115mph trap speed is indeed possible and we cant just throw it out because somebody doesnt like it.

115 does not add up. Fuzzy math.

There was either a bad sensor or massive wheel spin. I seriously doubt the massive wheel spin based on the 60' times.

Clock is 8MPH fast.

3800 lbs. 371HP = 12.65@107

Run a few 1/4 mile calculators and you will find your answer.

SubSolar · 05-31-2010, 03:10 AM

They didn't try it but it's just a little hard to believe that an auto GT ran 115 when all the manuals are running 110-112..

View Poll Results: .
Camaro	0	0%
Mustang	0	0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

05-30-2010, 10:48 PM	#5702
Blade Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS BVM Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Charlotte Posts: 4,689 View My Garage	2010 Vs 2011 Mustang: exterior differences Looks like someone on my floor just got a Mustang. Its a v6 for sure, because I don't see GT anywhere on the car. So how do I tell if its a 2010 or 2011? __________________ Formerly owner of: 2012 2SS/RS Build Thread - Totaled by red light runner 2010 LT/RS Build Thread - Traded in for 2012 2SS 2007 Acura TSX 1992 Oldsmobile Achieva V6 1992 Mercury Sable

05-30-2010, 11:07 PM	#5704
big hammer Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: manitoba Posts: 1,202	mph is too high. 60' in relation to ET looks good, but not the trap speed. __________________ Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da

05-30-2010, 11:30 PM	#5706
mlee CamaroFans.com Drives: ZLE & ZR2 Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Conroe, TX Posts: 37,973 View My Garage	That ET is what a Camaro normally runs with LTs... agree those traps on both lanes are high... __________________

05-31-2010, 02:09 AM	#5709
SubSolar Drives: 2009 Corvette, 1987 Buick GN Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Corona, California Posts: 197	I don't see how the hell it can run 115 mph stock, especially an auto. Most of the sticks in magazine tests have run 110, and Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords which usually always runs the fastest times did 12.6@112 with a stick. __________________ 2009 Corvette A6, Victory Red, bone stock dyno: 373.8 rwhp / 364.5 lbs. torque 1987 Buick Grand National Dyno run: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qghTd47KOgY&hd=1

05-30-2010, 07:07 PM	#5699
8cd03gro Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Colorado Posts: 2,997	Some mag trapped 116 with an auto. Motorweek? Something like that.

05-30-2010, 10:31 PM	#5701
fazm Drives: ex-500hp v6 mustang Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: arizona Posts: 605	still far from fully optimized drag suspension lol. you can tell from the videos of it running, it jumps every shift. once they got shocks, springs, solid bushings, etc, its not fully optimized

05-30-2010, 11:03 PM	#5703
ViperTomcat Banned Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Oregon Posts: 1,697	A 2011 V6 will have dual pipes and mostly you can tell by the noise. A 2010 V6 will have a single pipe and will sound horrible.

05-31-2010, 01:50 AM	#5708
wbt Account Suspended Drives: 2010 Challenger R/T;2011 Mustang GT Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Texas Posts: 2,105	On the GT... The rear valance is different. 5.0 on the front fender that replaces the GT emblem. Wheels are different. Brembo front brakes. Silver pony on front grill vs. black for 2010.

05-31-2010, 03:10 AM	#5712
SubSolar Drives: 2009 Corvette, 1987 Buick GN Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Corona, California Posts: 197	They didn't try it but it's just a little hard to believe that an auto GT ran 115 when all the manuals are running 110-112.. __________________ 2009 Corvette A6, Victory Red, bone stock dyno: 373.8 rwhp / 364.5 lbs. torque 1987 Buick Grand National Dyno run: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qghTd47KOgY&hd=1

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Camaro VS Mustang Mega Thread	Beau Tie	Chevy Camaro vs...	3644	03-09-2012 08:45 PM
Gran Turismo 5... No Camaro?	5thGenOwner	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	111	12-06-2011 11:06 AM
Official 2011 Mustang GT info released	nester7929	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	81	12-28-2009 04:13 PM