Your thoughts

[Silverlsinva]

I think the car is fine the way it is. Why does a car have to Look fast and be attention grabbing (hello officer) looks chevy isn't the sportiest looking of car brands. I believe Caddy and Dodge and Mercedes and Bmws all look sporty. Also to me SS sedan in certain colors looks bland like silver and black aren't the best colors but the blue and red and white look great on it.

[sizl1]

Originally Posted by midnighter

Is that a Honda Accord. Sorry, I had to.

Nope. Bottom grille looks like a Hyundai grille:





Thought Ford was bad for looking like an Aston Martin? Well at least they aimed high, not low.

[snackbar64]

Originally Posted by Silverlsinva

I think the car is fine the way it is. Why does a car have to Look fast and be attention grabbing (hello officer) looks chevy isn't the sportiest looking of car brands. I believe Caddy and Dodge and Mercedes and Bmws all look sporty. Also to me SS sedan in certain colors looks bland like silver and black aren't the best colors but the blue and red and white look great on it.

It's gonna be mighty hard to shake 45k out of buyers if it doesn't look the part. The Pontiac G-8 was a sleeper that actually looked good. Personally I'd rather have a CTS-V with a few miles on it for the same money.

[matt55]

Originally Posted by snackbar64

It's gonna be mighty hard to shake 45k out of buyers if it doesn't look the part. The Pontiac G-8 was a sleeper that actually looked good. Personally I'd rather have a CTS-V with a few miles on it for the same money.

+1 . $45k its a cts-v (used) for me hands down .

But the inside does look good on the ss.