The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-11-2014, 02:08 PM   #491
v6sonoma


 
v6sonoma's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS RS
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 8,108
I'm surprised they didn't go with the 4.3L V6 from the full size trucks. Was kinda hoping to get another one since my 99's has been so great these last 15 years.

But if they can slap those turbos on the 3.6L I guess I'd be ok.
__________________

Mods: BBK Intake, BBK LT's and High Flow Cats, Corsa Cat-back exhaust, Hurst short throw shifter, SLP skip-shift eliminator.

7/1/09 Placed order for IOM/IO int/ SS/RS 6M
9/26/09 Took delivery!
v6sonoma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2014, 02:34 PM   #492
snizzle
Recalled user
 
snizzle's Avatar
 
Drives: '12 Camaro SS, '18 Colorado Z71
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,520
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToolFan66 View Post
I don't see that happening any time soon. The Tacoma has been the king of mid sized trucks for many years, and they keep their value on the used market for a reason..

With that said I wish I had held out buying my tacoma till these hit the streets as I like what I'm seeing, hope they are what they seem to be..
I just hope the Colorado is much better b/c the Tacoma is a relic without any competition for the most part. Would be embarrassing for Chevy if not.
__________________

2012 2SS 45th AE LS3 M6

Borla ATAK Catback
Kooks Stepped LT Headers
CAI Intake
Hexvents
VMAX CNC Ported Throttle Body
RX Catch Can
Hurst Short Throw Shifter
Pfadt ZL-Spec Stage 3 Suspension
Forgestar F14
Tuned by Frost
snizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2014, 05:33 PM   #493
Mikes SS

 
Mikes SS's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 CGM 2SS/RS 6M
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 1,032
I am still suprised too that they are using the 3.6 for gas mileage, if that were the case why didn't they put it in the silverado? Or why have the engine anyway?
Mikes SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2014, 06:31 PM   #494
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikes SS View Post
I am still suprised too that they are using the 3.6 for gas mileage, if that were the case why didn't they put it in the silverado? Or why have the engine anyway?
Where do you get the idea that there is only a single reason (fuel economy) for using the 3.6 instead of the 4.3? The Silverado & Colorado each have their own requirements. Some are directly related to the customer (power, torque, fuel economy, NVH, etc) others are rooted in the manufacturing side of things (ie, what engines can the platform accommodate/what would it cost to add another engine family to this platform). And what may be top priority for one may be ranked 4th or 5th for the other. In the end, it worked out that the best engine to use as a base for the Silverado was a 5.7L V8 with 2 cylinders lopped off, while the Colorado gets a car engine for its range topper.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2014, 08:46 PM   #495
Mikes SS

 
Mikes SS's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 CGM 2SS/RS 6M
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 1,032
Well seeing as how the new 4.3L (LV3) makes 285hp@5300 and 305ftlbs@3900 vs the 3.6L 305hp@6950 and 269ftlbs@4000 it has to be the only reason...trucks need torque, and the HP and torque are more usable down lower RPM's and with E85 the LV3 puts out 297hp and 330ftlbs...I have no doubt that a smaller engine would fit in the truck too since to the best of my knowledge the LV3 is smaller and weighs less, and is cheaper to make than the 3.6L
Mikes SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2014, 09:16 PM   #496
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikes SS View Post
Well seeing as how the new 4.3L (LV3) makes 285hp@5300 and 305ftlbs@3900 vs the 3.6L 305hp@6950 and 269ftlbs@4000 it has to be the only reason...trucks need torque, and the HP and torque are more usable down lower RPM's and with E85 the LV3 puts out 297hp and 330ftlbs...I have no doubt that a smaller engine would fit in the truck too since to the best of my knowledge the LV3 is smaller and weighs less, and is cheaper to make than the 3.6L
Its not just about having an engine sized space under the hood & between the fenders. To add the 3.6 to the Silverado you have to design the truck to accomodate a 2nd engine family. That adds cost, complexity, and weight. On top of that, I bet the 3.6 costs a good deal more to manufacture than the 4.3 does -which makes one more suitable as a range topper & the other as a base engine.

Thats what I was getting at when I mentioned the multitude of factors that need to be balanced when sorting out what applications get what engines. With only a small fraction of the data (and concerns) that GM has, we can only really speculate as to why exactly A happened over B. Not that I'm above such speculation, its just that we can talk until we're blue in the face (or, perhaps more accurately type until we're blue in the fingers?) but we won't be able to reach anything definitive.



btw

Don't let the peak rpms fool you: the two engines actually make pretty much the same low-end torque. Look at the dyno graphs of the two & they're usually within, I'd say about 5 ft-lbs of each other up until about 3200 rpm. From there, the LV3 builds to its peak then drops off while the LFX pretty much holds steady until around 6k -explaining the difference in peak power.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2014, 11:01 PM   #497
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
I....

btw

Don't let the peak rpms fool you: the two engines actually make pretty much the same low-end torque. Look at the dyno graphs of the two & they're usually within, I'd say about 5 ft-lbs of each other up until about 3200 rpm. From there, the LV3 builds to its peak then drops off while the LFX pretty much holds steady until around 6k -explaining the difference in peak power.
I really love the new LV3, but the LFX is also a fantastic engine that makes good FLAT torque. The engine loves to rev, but doesn't need to rev to make decent power like some think.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2014, 01:45 PM   #498
Scrappy Doo


 
Scrappy Doo's Avatar
 
Drives: Callaway Rogue
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: W8n 4 Snow, Minnesota
Posts: 4,731
Wouldn't the 4.3 already have been validated etc for truck use? Seems it would be cheaper than the 3.6 that way?

Or is the base 4 of the same family as the 3.6?

(Don't know much about engine specifics)
Scrappy Doo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2014, 02:34 PM   #499
Silverlsinva


 
Silverlsinva's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Fiat 500 Abarth Grigio
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Manassas, Va
Posts: 3,124
I bet it has more to do with that there is a Suv/crossover version I believe overseas so that it gets better MPG's while having decent power to move the weight and even though believe that the 4.3 should have been used instead of the 3.6 it is what it is and they aren't going to change it.
Silverlsinva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2014, 07:00 AM   #500
Mikes SS

 
Mikes SS's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 CGM 2SS/RS 6M
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 1,032
Yeah it could be that, or that there is a chance it would outperform the Silverado 1500, it would be hard to legitimize it. The Colorado is almost as big but weighs 900lbs less, so I'd imagine with the same available engine it would tow as much, cost less and get better MPG's.
Mikes SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 11:16 AM   #501
Camaro_Corvette
36.58625, -121.7568
 
Camaro_Corvette's Avatar
 
Drives: Team 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,710
Wish this thing was out. I may have to pull the trigger on a blazer replacement soon. :( And I'm not into buying a vehicle and a few months later buying a different one. Once it's done, its done.
__________________
I am seriously never serious vv V vv Next order of business
Camaro_Corvette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 04:34 PM   #502
Silverlsinva


 
Silverlsinva's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Fiat 500 Abarth Grigio
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Manassas, Va
Posts: 3,124
Is this due for a Sept/October order and in dealers by then or we talking Nov/Decemeber
Silverlsinva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 04:49 PM   #503
mlee
CamaroFans.com
 
mlee's Avatar
 
Drives: ZLE & ZR2
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 37,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silverlsinva View Post
Is this due for a Sept/October order and in dealers by then or we talking Nov/Decemeber
Ordering in Sept which means pricing and options will be out by then. After that most likely another 6 to 8 weeks before we see them on the ground.
__________________
mlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 06:20 PM   #504
Mikes SS

 
Mikes SS's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 CGM 2SS/RS 6M
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 1,032
Could have swore I already saw the ordering and options guide published!?!
Mikes SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.