|
|
#29 |
![]() ![]() Drives: Both American Made Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 781
|
This is one case where the car really does look better in person. Then again, the GT-R was never known for its looks. Its a legendary machine for one reason...performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() Drives: 71 Hemi Cuda Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Laguna Niguel
Posts: 20
|
There are 2 on the showroom floor here in the OC, but guess what, it had an $18,000 MARK UP!!!! and to be honest, i can't see why so many people hate them. They really are nice cars, i mean 0-60 in 3.2sec, thats pretty fast. And they look pretty cool, but from what i've heard it's nissan causing all the problems with it, making up excuses such as "driving it too hard" so they can save a buck and not live up to their warranty. I would rather have a V8 in which will last me a few years rather than a fast japanese 6cyl that will last me a month.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Camaro➎ moderator
|
Quote:
Last edited by Milk 1027; 10-20-2008 at 04:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() ![]() Drives: Both American Made Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 781
|
I think the GTR haters should show proof of some things. 1. Show us where it says the warranty will be voided for using Launch Control. 2. Defend your position that the car is false advertisement. And as far as I know, the only rumored problems were transmission related. Again I would stress the word RUMOR. There have been no indication that these motors are anything but bullet proof. The Japanese have been building 6-cylinders capable of 1200 HP for many years now.
The great thing about the internet is it gives everyone a voice. We need to always consider the source. Just because someone writes something (myself included) doesn't make it so. Last edited by rmyers; 10-20-2008 at 11:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
![]() Drives: '91 Z-28 Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 446
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
killer bAnana
Drives: 1985 z28 Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Carson, CA
Posts: 694
|
^^ 'nuff said
__________________
"Shut your noise tube, Taco Human!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Not That sad..considering
Drives: Man Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: the part of washington the capital forgot about.
Posts: 3,745
|
Quote:
it seems the people complaining about thier gtr's would be proof of thier non bulletproofness.....
__________________
Stop Whinging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
![]() ![]() Drives: Both American Made Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 781
|
I have found credible evidence where Nissan does indeed state how the Warranty would be voided. However they are very clear in saying that turning VDC off does NOT void warrantly and using Launch Control does NOT void warranty, however they do seem to indicate that if something breaks while using Launch Control, it would not be covered. Personally I believe they will be sued over this, as it is against the law for a MFG to offer a capability that could ultimately void the warranty. And the conditions for which a failure would not be covered are still vague. Now have said that, just because someone on the forum says there tranny failed, doesn't make it so. It would be very simple for anyone to post this without showing proof. What I am saying is that we have a bunch of very immature people who want to do nothing more than jump on the band wagon of GT-R haters.
So to all the haters, I still say show me proof, show me a car except for Z06 offering similar performance for the price, or just please be quiet. And above all, remember that just because something is on the internet doesn't make it true. Ask for proof or drink the kool-aid....you get to choose. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
gtr lovers and haters, huh?...
![]() Lets say I'm in neither camp...I still haven't seen any prove that Nissan lapped the Nurburgring in a legitimately factory-spec car. Physics argues otherwise...and I still can't figure out why "godzilla" is so much better than its tried-and-tested competitors when nissan is voiding warrantees because they know the car is unreliable when driven the way it's supposed to be driven. Yet, on the other hand, I can't find any proof against its legit-spec track-time, besides Porche's claim of "No f'ing way"....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Enlightened
Drives: Nothing Currently Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,285
|
Hater and Kool-aid comments. The most lame comebacks on the web. Soon, somebody will swoop in and call you an OMGGTR-fanboiiiiii.
The fact is, nobody has any concrete evidence to support either claim. That launch control voids warranty, or that a factory spec GTR can post times that defy physics no matter what computer wizardry you have. Though I must say, when Porsche, with it's heritage, pedigree, and driver experience can't replicate that time, it get's iffy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Full Fledged Member
|
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=Is7UQsaxLVU
So first a button to void the warranty and now a self-destruct button...those Japanese think of everything.
__________________
'18 1SS 1LE - DD
'72 Cutlass - LSA topped 370" LS2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: Both American Made Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 781
|
I bet his tranny blew so he lit it on fire. Since the warranty was voided, he will get his insurance to pay for it.Say what yall want, the GT-R is one bad a$$ car. ![]() ![]() ![]() Signed FanBoy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
![]() Drives: '91 Z-28 Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 446
|
I personally have loved GTRs for years... having said that for all those who require proof, I've posted a link below that I've used for years, it's pretty awesome really, and find myself using it almost daily
http://www.google.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Full Fledged Member
|
So Google will show us how much you love GTRs?
__________________
'18 1SS 1LE - DD
'72 Cutlass - LSA topped 370" LS2 |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| You guy's will love this | MCPOAJ | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 12 | 03-12-2008 07:17 AM |