CTS-V's biggest concern isn't the M5 - Page 3

Robert91RS · 08-27-2008, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wm Holden

Congratz!!

Thank you much sir!

BowtieGuy · 08-28-2008, 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wm Holden

CTS-V's biggest concern isn't the M5 ....you're right...it's my GTO!

Jeez man, why does everything have to come back to your damn monster Goat?!

Wm Holden · 08-28-2008, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BowtieGuy

Jeez man, why does everything have to come back to your damn monster Goat?!

I'm not exactly sure...but I think it has something to do with quantum physics and the origins of the universe....

SilverTurtle · 08-28-2008, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drivingincamaro

lets see the cts-v is 51,424$ the rs6 82,000$.

no thanks i would take the cts-v over that bland car any day

I came in here to post that

fldrummer · 08-29-2008, 12:05 AM

I'm loving the look of the new Audi lineup; even the new TT looks sexy, not girly, now. The one I really drool over though is the S5--looks so sick (in a good way)! Too bad they only gave it a low-displacement V-8 with 354 HP. For the same price, I could get a 335i, slap a piggy-back tune on it, and walk all over the S5...or [drum roll, pun intended] get an SS/RS for much less and still beat an S5. Another little interesting fact--the S5 is even heavier (~3,900 lbs.) than the upcoming SS!

...But, the allure of the Audi (if I could afford it) is so tempting.

*TAG UR IT* · 08-29-2008, 02:17 AM

I'd take the CTS-V over the Audi any day. BUT...and I say BUT....that Audi is gorgeous!!! I give Audi a hand for that beauty....now, I want to see what that interior looks like. A twin turbo V10??? Umpf....

BowtieGuy · 08-29-2008, 12:50 PM

Oh and I forgot to add. Two more cylinders, and a twin turbo setup, and only 30 more horses than the twin screw V8? I salute you General!

iPODFAN11 · 08-29-2008, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ihc95

Its the RS6 sedan. Plain and simple.
* 580hp twin turbocharged 5.0l V10
* Sophisticated AWD system
* Massive ceramic disc brakes
* Ultra advanced Tiptronic tranny w/ shift times down to one tenth of a second
* Did I mention it also looks gorgeous

Attachment 7217

Attachment 7218

Hmm, that or this:

I say CTS-V.

Navy Blue · 08-29-2008, 09:51 PM

i gotta say both are attractive cars, in my side of the screen the audi is perfection, i don't take anything away from the cts, its a great car, i love caddies, but i think the differences are too big to even be comparing them, 4 wd vs 2 wd? v8 vs v10? and the prices...why bother, can't we just say they both are gorgeous in their classes? or does anyone really think they should be matched? i for one dont. but given the chance to buy one if i had the income or get one free...yea right huh? i'd gotta say i'd get the audi, i've been a fan of em for a very long time. now audi vs caddy vs camaro? i don't care if audi is german exellence, cadillac is gm, i'll get a camaro

*TAG UR IT* · 08-30-2008, 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iPODFAN11

Hmm, that or this:

I say CTS-V.

Doh my God....

headpunter · 08-30-2008, 04:02 AM

i hate to say it but if when im out of nursing school i could get one of those for 45(used)-50k i would buy it over a camaro /hide

the interior is just so damned nice. but i doubt that price will happen.

FenwickHockey65 · 08-30-2008, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iPODFAN11

Hmm, that or this:

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how you build a performance/luxury sedan.

Emher · 08-30-2008, 10:37 AM

I just don't like the look of Audi's sedans. For me the CTS-V wins. If they made an RS5 on the other hand...that I would be intrested in.

ihc95 · 08-30-2008, 11:08 AM

Dont get me wrong, the CTS-V is a gorgeous car. Although, just like the M5, its trying to hard to look angry and powerful while as the RS6 is quiet and dignified. The only way you can tell it apart from an A6 are by small details, which, IMO is the way it sould be in a sedan.

08-29-2008, 09:51 PM	#37
Navy Blue Future Camaro Owner Drives: 2001 Chevy Impala Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Whiting IN Posts: 258	being honest i gotta say both are attractive cars, in my side of the screen the audi is perfection, i don't take anything away from the cts, its a great car, i love caddies, but i think the differences are too big to even be comparing them, 4 wd vs 2 wd? v8 vs v10? and the prices...why bother, can't we just say they both are gorgeous in their classes? or does anyone really think they should be matched? i for one dont. but given the chance to buy one if i had the income or get one free...yea right huh? i'd gotta say i'd get the audi, i've been a fan of em for a very long time. now audi vs caddy vs camaro? i don't care if audi is german exellence, cadillac is gm, i'll get a camaro

08-30-2008, 04:02 AM	#39
headpunter Not That sad..considering Drives: Man Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: the part of washington the capital forgot about. Posts: 3,745 View My Garage	i hate to say it but if when im out of nursing school i could get one of those for 45(used)-50k i would buy it over a camaro /hide the interior is just so damned nice. but i doubt that price will happen. __________________ Stop Whinging

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
2008 Cadillac CTS	KILLER74Z28	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	12	05-08-2016 08:35 PM
Cadillac CTS with same engine	lafountain	Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	28	08-18-2008 01:37 PM
CTS Wagon revealed	Scotsman	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	22	08-16-2008 05:20 PM
CADILLAC IS BACK...	Scotsman	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	17	06-01-2008 01:36 AM
The new CTS V for 2009!!! LSA GMHTP...READ THIS.	TAG UR IT	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	15	04-01-2008 10:21 PM

08-29-2008, 12:05 AM	#33
fldrummer "Black Ace" Drives: Supercharged 2010 SS, 2016 Golf R Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Posts: 1,350	I'm loving the look of the new Audi lineup; even the new TT looks sexy, not girly, now. The one I really drool over though is the S5--looks so sick (in a good way)! Too bad they only gave it a low-displacement V-8 with 354 HP. For the same price, I could get a 335i, slap a piggy-back tune on it, and walk all over the S5...or [drum roll, pun intended] get an SS/RS for much less and still beat an S5. Another little interesting fact--the S5 is even heavier (~3,900 lbs.) than the upcoming SS! ...But, the allure of the Audi (if I could afford it) is so tempting.

08-29-2008, 02:17 AM	#34
TAG UR IT www.Camaro5store.com Drives: 2014 ZL1 #705 Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: SA, Texas Posts: 26,544 View My Garage	I'd take the CTS-V over the Audi any day. BUT...and I say BUT....that Audi is gorgeous!!! I give Audi a hand for that beauty....now, I want to see what that interior looks like. A twin turbo V10??? Umpf....

08-29-2008, 12:50 PM	#35
BowtieGuy Enlightened Drives: Nothing Currently Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Oklahoma Posts: 1,285	Oh and I forgot to add. Two more cylinders, and a twin turbo setup, and only 30 more horses than the twin screw V8? I salute you General!

08-30-2008, 10:37 AM	#41
Emher Pillaging Viking Drives: Saab 9-5 '99 (Hey it's a GM!) Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Sweden Posts: 1,189	I just don't like the look of Audi's sedans. For me the CTS-V wins. If they made an RS5 on the other hand...that I would be intrested in.

08-30-2008, 11:08 AM	#42
ihc95 Drives: 2018 GT PP1 A10 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: NJ Posts: 673	Dont get me wrong, the CTS-V is a gorgeous car. Although, just like the M5, its trying to hard to look angry and powerful while as the RS6 is quiet and dignified. The only way you can tell it apart from an A6 are by small details, which, IMO is the way it sould be in a sedan.