lawls, Ford EcoBoost - Page 3

BobDigi5060 · 09-25-2014, 06:17 PM

V6 Camaros have a good 200 pounds on the Ecoboost, more with a bolt on turbo kit. I don't think your 2014 Camaro logic applies to the all new 15' Mustang, lol. Watch this space.

BobDigi5060 · 09-25-2014, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl

Agreed. I want to know how to get my front wheels off the ground.

I don't know, buy an Ecoboost

1QwikZ28 · 09-25-2014, 06:50 PM

If it isn't a Camaro, then it didn't happen...C5 logic.

GretchenGotGrowl · 09-25-2014, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobDigi5060

I don't know, buy an Ecoboost

Have one of those, just not a mustang.

GretchenGotGrowl · 09-25-2014, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1QwikZ28

If it isn't a Camaro, then it didn't happen...C5 logic.

Not doubting the time, just think we don't have the whole picture on the mods.

PoorMansCamaro · 09-25-2014, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife

It's not "fake"...it is the actual engine noises but run thru noise cancelling software.

you mean noise increasing software?

chrisx66 · 09-25-2014, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1QwikZ28

If it isn't a Camaro, then it didn't happen...C5 logic.

Damn, all you do is bash Camaro's and this site. Trade your Camaro in for a Mustang, I get D plan pricing I'll give you one of my pins so you can go away.

2010-1SS-IBM · 09-25-2014, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT

I'd gladly swap my '99 GT for a new 2.3

The four cylinder phobia in here is laughable.

I'd gladly swap a 99GT for any of the 8 cylinder cars being sold today. Why is that so hard to say?

It's not that we have 4 cylinder phobia, it's that we don't want to drive cars that perform a little better than cars 15 years old.

Manbearpig · 09-25-2014, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1QwikZ28

If it isn't a Camaro, then it didn't happen...C5 logic.

You tell em bruh!

Don't let a little thing like "rudimentary physics" get in your way.

KMPrenger · 09-26-2014, 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobDigi5060

V6 Camaros have a good 200 pounds on the Ecoboost, more with a bolt on turbo kit. I don't think your 2014 Camaro logic applies to the all new 15' Mustang, lol. Watch this space.

100 - 200 pounds depending on configurations chosen.

I knew this Ecoboost would be dang fast with a tune and some basic mods....but who didn't honestly?

Pulling the wheels is un-expected. Looking forward to seeing more.

Gretchen...you can take comfort knowing that 99% of the cars on the road would only be seeing your tail lights in a proper drag lol. So the wheels don't come up.....no biggie!!!

GretchenGotGrowl · 09-26-2014, 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMPrenger

100 - 200 pounds depending on configurations chosen.

I knew this Ecoboost would be dang fast with a tune and some basic mods....but who didn't honestly?

Pulling the wheels is un-expected. Looking forward to seeing more.

Gretchen...you can take comfort knowing that 99% of the cars on the road would only be seeing your tail lights in a proper drag lol. So the wheels don't come up.....no biggie!!!

But it would make such a great avatar picture

NASTY99Z28 · 09-26-2014, 11:29 AM

Wheels,tune and a downpipe is what it took to run 12.5's with the eco boost. Soon the web will be full of videos of those suckers dragging a lot of cars. I'd buy one in a heartbeat if I didn't hate the front end so much.

BobDigi5060 · 09-26-2014, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMPrenger

100 - 200 pounds depending on configurations chosen.

I knew this Ecoboost would be dang fast with a tune and some basic mods....but who didn't honestly?

Pulling the wheels is un-expected. Looking forward to seeing more.

Gretchen...you can take comfort knowing that 99% of the cars on the road would only be seeing your tail lights in a proper drag lol. So the wheels don't come up.....no biggie!!!

Oh my mistake, 100 something pounds

trademaster · 09-26-2014, 09:15 PM

Remember when the 2.3 wasn't going to respond to modifications as well as the v6 and would make less torque with a peakier torque curve?

09-26-2014, 11:29 AM	#40
NASTY99Z28 Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9 Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Florida Posts: 1,277	Wheels,tune and a downpipe is what it took to run 12.5's with the eco boost. Soon the web will be full of videos of those suckers dragging a lot of cars. I'd buy one in a heartbeat if I didn't hate the front end so much. __________________ I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!

09-25-2014, 06:17 PM	#29
BobDigi5060 Drives: 97' A4, 08' Mustang, 15' Legacy Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: TX Posts: 114	V6 Camaros have a good 200 pounds on the Ecoboost, more with a bolt on turbo kit. I don't think your 2014 Camaro logic applies to the all new 15' Mustang, lol. Watch this space.

09-25-2014, 06:50 PM	#31
1QwikZ28 Drives: 1999 Camaro Z28 Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: S. Texas Posts: 181	If it isn't a Camaro, then it didn't happen...C5 logic.

09-26-2014, 09:15 PM	#42
trademaster Drives: 12 MP4-12C, 16 Quattroporte Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Working Posts: 707	Remember when the 2.3 wasn't going to respond to modifications as well as the v6 and would make less torque with a peakier torque curve?