GM Reveals 2014 GMC Sierra Denali

[FenwickHockey65]

No Regular Cab SLT.

[Mr. iNCREDIBLE]

the interior of that truck is light years ahead of any previous GM truck.. OMG it is just beautiful..

that was one of the things I hated about my Avalanche, the interior was so bland, and so dull and so yuck

[NASTY99Z28]

Originally Posted by mikeyg36

They actually answered that question in that video you posted a couple of days ago.

Happen to have a link sir?

Originally Posted by Silverlsinva

So as I was reading more I saw that the 6.2 will only be avail. on the Slt trim models only? Does that mean one could order a reg cab Slt with 6.2 in it? Please say its so.

Can you say SS silverado?!?!? It would be a rocket with a bed tied to it but knowing GM it will never happen. The sad part is they have all the parts there to make it happen yet they won't....

[LOWDOWN]

Love the GMC Wheels!

Now, a Vette LT1/8-speed AutoMagic, CTS-V IRS, 3/4-Ton Brakes...wrapped in a 2WD Short Box Regular Cab that sits about 4" lower...might make some of us forget about Trans Ams...

[05stram]

Originally Posted by shaffe

That sir is incorrect.

those would be the ratings for the base 5.0 V-8. The "premium" engines would be the eco-boost and the 6.2L

Eco Boost is 365 HP and 420 Tq
6.2 is 411 hp and 434 tq

that is incorrect sir the King Rancher cannot be had with the 6.2 and besides those numbers are still lower than what is in the article.

http://www.ford.com/trucks/f150/trim/kingranch/

and who wants an ecochoke I like to know I can accelerate when I want too.

[HeavyIOM]

Originally Posted by 05stram

Already has walk by an F150 and sneeze and blow a dent in the side of one

What part of the HP equation did you not see the F150 with its premium engine only puts down 360/380. The Microsoft Technology they are using is dated and has not been updated. The only thing The King Rancher has going for it is marketing

That's not the premium engine. that's one of the lower engines.

Sync may have been around for a little but your a fool if you think its never been updated. I can tell you this the Sync is way ahead of the hands free in my 12 Camaro.

If you think all the F150 has going for it is marketing that must be some amazing marketing, seeing as the F150 is the Number one selling vehicle in the US and the number one selling truck in what, almost 30 years?

Fact is GM can throw all the HP at the trucks they want and they wont outsell the F150. The F150 just has to good of a rep. Even when GM was putting the 6.0 in some trucks the F150 only had a underpowered 5.4. (Not a fan at all of the 5.4) the F150 still blew GMs truck away.

[King T]

Originally Posted by NASTY99Z28

Would it be safe to assume 450/480 with the e85 tune? And 490/490 with the vette also on e85?

I don't think the 6.2L Ecotec3 V8 (L86) is flex fuel capable.

Just going by this model order sheet, of course it states that the 4.3L V6 and 5.3L V8 are
http://www.gmfleetorderguide.com/NAS...D=3&print=true

[05stram]

Originally Posted by calebparkin3

That's not the premium engine. that's one of the lower engines.

Sync may have been around for a little but your a fool if you think its never been updated. I can tell you this the Sync is way ahead of the hands free in my 12 Camaro.

If you think all the F150 has going for it is marketing that must be some amazing marketing, seeing as the F150 is the Number one selling vehicle in the US and the number one selling truck in what, almost 30 years?

Fact is GM can throw all the HP at the trucks they want and they wont outsell the F150. The F150 just has to good of a rep. Even when GM was putting the 6.0 in some trucks the F150 only had a underpowered 5.4. (Not a fan at all of the 5.4) the F150 still blew GMs truck away.

GM split it's truck line into two offerings and Ford offers one. So the fact remains is it the number one selling truck? I think this debate has been had before so I do not wish to rehash it here but I can tell you the answer is not as clear as fords marketing makes it appear. GM should make the claim as it should.

[shaffe]

Originally Posted by 05stram

that is incorrect sir the King Rancher cannot be had with the 6.2 and besides those numbers are still lower than what is in the article.

http://www.ford.com/trucks/f150/trim/kingranch/

and who wants an ecochoke I like to know I can accelerate when I want too.

Wouldnt the platinum f150 be more comparable to the Denali ?

[FenwickHockey65]

King Ranch - High Country

Platinum - Denali

[05stram]

Really I thought the Platinum was like the LTZ FenwickHockey65

[shaffe]

Originally Posted by 05stram

Really I thought the Platinum was like the LTZ FenwickHockey65

I believe that would be the lariat trim level.

[FenwickHockey65]

Originally Posted by 05stram

Really I thought the Platinum was like the LTZ FenwickHockey65

LTZ is even lower than Denali.

[05stram]

Originally Posted by shaffe

I believe that would be the lariat trim level.

gotcha forgot the Lariat
So is the Platinum above the King Rancher?