|
|
#29 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010, Rally Yellow, Black stripes Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,363
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() Drives: Used to be 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS L99 Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010, Rally Yellow, Black stripes Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,363
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
![]() Drives: Used to be 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS L99 Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 636
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() Drives: 2LT/RS (TBD) Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Englishtown NJ
Posts: 227
|
Will the new Ecoboost Mustang also come with the exploding driveshaft?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: V8 american car Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,417
|
That photo of the green concept sketch looks fine to me.
But the truth is, the "final release" of any car never looks as good as a concept sketch anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Vette Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 572
|
Has potential.
And I certainly wouldn't expect this forum to go goo-goo over ANYTHING that has Mustang on it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,969
|
Quote:
The rendering in the article, while being a good looking car in my opinion, does look a bit awkward as well. The side profile looks exactly like the current car, but with a new front end pasted on. If what the guy in the mustang forum says is true, the backend is pretty cool though. A 310HP/300TQ turbo 4 in a lightweight pony car would certainly be fun, and once the boost is turned up and the warranty is thrown on the window look out! I'm guessing we will see something similar in the next Camaro. That said, i still want a modern V6 option with hopefully 330 - 340 HP! (Then I'd mod it for another 20 or 30 HP )
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
![]() Drives: 2014 Subaru Forester, 2010 Equinox Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Bend, IN
Posts: 560
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 3,746
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 3,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 3,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
LVL 50 Troll Stomper
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,463
|
So what you're saying is an engine with a larger displacement and more power is going to make better fuel economy than the less powerful lower displacement engine in the Focus ST? Cool!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Mazda6, 2011 Mustang 5.0 Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Portage, Wisconsin
Posts: 4,049
|
34 MPG? It better get better than that, or else it will effectively put to bet the notion that this downsizing and turbo charging gives enough of an efficiency gain to be worth it. The current 305 hp V6 gets 31. Add direct injection (which the EcoBoost has and the current V6 doesn't), and it wouldn't be too much of a stretch to assume the V6 could get 33-34 in the probably smaller, lighter, more aerodynamic next gen Mustang. So where are the supposed savings associated with EcoBoost?
__________________
2022 1SS 1LE (Arrived 4/29/22)
"The car is the closest thing we will ever create to something that is alive." |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|