|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you think of the style of the 2015 Mustang? | |||
| Really like it. |
|
62 | 21.99% |
| Undecided, but leaning positive. |
|
80 | 28.37% |
| Undecided, but leaning negative. |
|
69 | 24.47% |
| Don't like it at all. |
|
71 | 25.18% |
| Voters: 282. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#309 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RJT/L99 Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 1,151
|
Damn, I really like it. With the bits and pieces from the Boss 302, the 5.0 Coyote will be tough to beat.
__________________
2SS/RJT/L99
|
|
|
|
|
|
#310 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Wow! i would say this in one well done redesign. they needed to keep it a Mustang and make it international at the same ime and they have succeeded!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#311 |
![]() Drives: 2013 GAZ 2SS/RS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 418
|
I like it, looks cool and ready for gfx and high wing spoiler it would look real cool... But having drove mustangs before, I will stick to my camaro as it's a much more refined driving experience.
-Robert
__________________
If you see it, get it, for tomorrow it may be gone!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#312 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: fanboys and ass kissers crazy. Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 7,275
|
The car looks good and will attract buyers. 4 banger is a good move (they've done it before successfully). Having said this, I have total faith that Team Camaro will best this car with the 6th gen.
__________________
"BBOMG - More than just a car show.... It's an experience!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#313 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3 VR Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chatham, ON
Posts: 765
|
I actually like it more than I thought I would. Most of the car seems to be an evolution of the current design which is a good thing. The grill is too much Ford Fusion which wouldn't be a bad thing if it was exclusive to the Mustang. I just don't see the majority preferring it over the current generation... we'll see how sales go
|
|
|
|
|
|
#314 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1998 Nissan, 2010 Camaro Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 827
|
Bland. It's a shame the new Mach 1 is coming out with that generation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#315 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
|
Quote:
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#316 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2019 GT350 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
|
Looks like upgrades to the Coyote and Transmission as well. I'd guess it will have to be 450 hp when Ford releases the official numbers.
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/eve..._photos_specs/
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang 2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock 2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s 2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s 2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned 1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot |
|
|
|
|
|
#317 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Camaros................ Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Seven Fields, PA (Pittsburgh)
Posts: 4,523
|
Quote:
Someone jumped to conclusions.......
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#318 |
|
www.Camaro5store.com
|
I like it. And windows are windows. You need to have the window go back behind the head to open blind spots. Roof lines and what not are also pretty much the same from car to car...in other words, there's not much room to change that type of look. Yes, the stang looks much like the honda from the side. But again, there's not much they can do to differentiate w/out going ape shit crazy on price. Would I rather it be Audi(ish) with no b-piller? HELL YEAH. Same thing with the Camaro. I want my rear quarter windows to roll down and I sure as hell don't want a vert to do that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#319 |
![]() Drives: 2012 Black 2SS/RS M6 Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Stamford, Connecticut
Posts: 672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#320 |
|
Est.1775
Drives: '15 Challenger Hellcat (sold) Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,499
|
I do. Hence the term "option". If you don't want it don't add it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#321 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1998 Nissan, 2010 Camaro Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 827
|
Doc is spot on.
Also, Ford had to throw a V6 back into the mix on the new Mustang because the turbo 4 would have driven the base model price up higher than they were comfortable with. That should tell all car buyers where the value really is in regards to engines, and why car buyers should be pissed off about what's coming down the pipe. |
|
|
|
|
|
#322 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: some to distraction Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 627
|
Trash Talk, Ford-Style
From Road & Track:
It’s also worth mentioning that Chief Engineer Dave Pericak said during our viewing that he wanted the base Mustang to beat the 2012–2013 Mustang Boss 302 around a racetrack. [Base BOSS, or LS?!] So who’s this car for? Pericak name-checked the Porsche 911 and BMW M3 as benchmarks, but he noticeably didn’t mention the increasingly sharp Chevrolet Camaro. “There’s nothing wrong with that rivalry,” Pericak said, “but if you’re going to better yourself, you have to look beyond that kind of thing. We wanted to benchmark something else, something a little higher than that.” Read more: http://www.roadandtrack.com/go/first...#ixzz2mcoNTdDW |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|