|
|
#2829 | |
![]() Drives: 1997 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Southern California
Posts: 72
|
Quote:
P.S - Just curious. Where are all the guys that said "No matter what, the ZL1 will eat the GT500 up - regardless of its power increase ". You must really feel STUPID, now. Reason why I keep my shut, until the results are in. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2830 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
|
Quote:
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2831 | ||
|
CamaroFans.com
|
Quote:
I don't recall anyone ever saying that after the power increase statement... ![]() Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2832 |
|
Opinionated bugger!
Drives: Boss 302, Mazda 2, Praga & Intrepid Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oakville
Posts: 1,897
|
"smooth in, fast out" is true and probably does give the track advantage to the ZL1. I had my arse handed to me by a pro racing driver in a civic. She hung on my back side all the way through corners 1 to 5 so well I gave her the pass on the back straight. Never saw her again. And me and the Boss Mustang were humbled by real talent.
__________________
Follow me on forums everywhere as Fenderaddict2 or my kid on the track and Twitter @fastmyles |
|
|
|
|
|
#2833 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: . Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,017
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2834 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2835 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2836 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: . Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,017
|
Quote:
![]() Not defensive. I was curious if you were just quoting me, but replying to the general bashers. If you mixed me up with one of the bashers. Or......??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2837 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2838 | |
|
CamaroFans.com
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2839 |
|
eolson
Drives: 2006 premium Package Mustang GT cou Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northville, MI
Posts: 249
|
It will be great to see more direct cone test comparisons for the two cars, and also see some actual track road course times at some courses that have well established best lap time histories for various cars. Those lap times will make it pretty clear what the new GT500 can do, as well as the ZL1.
Why we are getting these subjective opinions from the press rather than actual road course times is beyond me. The GT500 has been out for a bit. I know print publication times need to wait the month for their press runs, but not one official track time on an established road course is pretty lame. Erik
__________________
2006 Prem Pkg Mustang GT coupe. Saleen SC,10psi, 454rwhp,442rwtq, Complete Steeda/H&R, suspension change out, with weight loss, Techco Watts link, Stoptech big brakes, Race clutch, Alum. flywheel, Alum 1 pc driveshaft, 9x18,10x18 chrome bullit wheels, 285/40/18,255/45/18 nitto 555 tires. 3545 lbs currently. New car scent air freshener.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2840 | |
|
Downright Upright
Drives: Daily Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
|
Quote:
The mags need the Manufacturers...and the Manufacturers need the mags. Where would the mags, and their minions, be without their fleets of "long-term test vehicles"? In showrooms, actually buying vehicles...and spending money...instead of creating used cars out of new ones. As to "times", a goodly amount of time was spent "hosting" the journos @ Atlanta. Rubber burned...hydrocarbons expended...1/4-mile times shared...but NO ROAD ATLANTA times were released...by ANYONE... hmmmmm... Remember, "the only bad publicity is NO publicity". Draw your own conclusion(s). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2841 | |
|
Downright Upright
Drives: Daily Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
|
Quote:
I watched an old episode of Top Gear last night. Richard Hammond was beat by 4 SECONDS on a less-than-1-minute course by the "resident expert" who was the Factory driver for that car on that course. Practice-practice-practice... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2842 |
|
eolson
Drives: 2006 premium Package Mustang GT cou Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northville, MI
Posts: 249
|
Being a person that had to build the performance into my October of 2005 delivery of my 06' Mustang GT, because there was no other fantastic high performance sport coupes around. Corvette was beautiful but only had two seats, and the Pontiac GTO which was being phased out, and the Dodge Charger SRT models were really not very agile.
I'm proud of the fact I fit my car out with much more power, and a lot better suspension with good chassis stiffening, better breaks. Car was a blast to drive all fit out. Problem is, all the magazines do is hype factory cars, which they must do, but there is rarely road course track times or slalom times, or figure eight lateral G ratings, for popular cars that have been fit out with better equipment. Why hasn't Steeda, put all there stuff plus some other stuff on a Mustang and said "here's what a car does fit out properly with our stuff" With the new cars being fit out so well with their track pack options, and all this new technology, it's hard to remember you can actually improve a car's handling a good deal for not that much money. The problem is there is no equivalent after market testing to actually convey recorded improvements. Most of the suspension improvements on the New Mustangs came from aftermarket deigns with technology sharing that proved to increase performance. To end my rant, I'm just tired of seeing the same 5 magazines control information on performance as if what happens on giant release factory cars is the only thing to test and verify better performance. Which is bull. The magazines should at least invite to testing a few independents, who could demonstrate real gains through improved items This happens with Horse Power and in Drag racing, but how often do you see a car with a changed out suspension, weight loss, and chassis stiffening compared to the factory model. Ever? So we'll wait some more before all 5 magazines and all the car companies decide on how they agree to spin these cars and there comparisons and results, and then pretend that they just grabbed some drivers and went out and tested the hell out of these cars. So now we'll see the same boring pattern for the comparison between the ZL1 and the GT500. They've all rehearsed their lines, and we'll hear" GT500 has more muscle, is more crude, harder to drive, don't like the interior, can't corner as good, isn't as refined" blah blah blah, and the ZL1 is slower in the 1/4, but it drives way smoother, it corners way better, it has a Rolls Royce interior, the PTA will like it better". How about the truth" we didn't bother actually driving the GT500 through the road atlanta course for a time, or dare take the car to another road course and actually drive it to it's max against the record time for that course". Now we'll wait until the media has rehearsed how we should think of these cars. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz z z z z z z z z z z z z z. Erik
__________________
2006 Prem Pkg Mustang GT coupe. Saleen SC,10psi, 454rwhp,442rwtq, Complete Steeda/H&R, suspension change out, with weight loss, Techco Watts link, Stoptech big brakes, Race clutch, Alum. flywheel, Alum 1 pc driveshaft, 9x18,10x18 chrome bullit wheels, 285/40/18,255/45/18 nitto 555 tires. 3545 lbs currently. New car scent air freshener.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|