The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-12-2010, 12:39 AM   #15
gregus73
 
gregus73's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Blue Challenger R/T
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 159
not a fan of the dash for the challenger, yet I really like the car.
also... drove a 300, I have heard that they a besed on the same platform.
gregus73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 07:16 AM   #16
bmwdon
I refuse to go smurfy
 
bmwdon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 Challenger SRT8, 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 1,311
2 very different cars, even if they are both "pony" cars. challenger is bigger in all aspects, interior room, trunk space, outside dimensions, WEIGHT, and it's based on a autobahn suspension, from a early 2000 E class mercedes suspension and transmission, and shares many things from the 300's, chargers and magnums. the camaro is smaller, lighter, "spritelier" is that a word? faster turn ins, etc.

I drive both daily and know they have very different qualities to them.
__________________

-Bill...the Camaro was my wifes, now she's got a minivan
Challenger- 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8 Procharger D1 Supercharger: 10.895 @ 126.720 MPH
bmwdon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 11:03 AM   #17
Romeloc

 
Romeloc's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS RS A6 Inferno
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,160
I don't like the inerior beacause its like all of chryslers interiors. The car looks great but still wouldnt buy one. Camaro 4 life.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]2010 Camaro Black 2SS/RS A6 Inferno Interior Polished Rims, Sunroof
Born 11/19/09
mods:
20% tints
Borla Atak cat-bak
Roto-Fab intake
amber footwell, dome, and trunk lighting(AAC)
Decepticon Gas door
Led Taillights (technostalgia)
Romeloc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 11:13 AM   #18
MontyCarlo

 
MontyCarlo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2LT/RS auto IBM
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,255
I've never been inside a Challenger, but any time I see the exterior of one I hear a narrator in my head saying "looks like them Duke boys are in a heap o' trouble this time."
__________________
FAQs:
1. No, I do not have any strong opinions about the Monte Carlo.
2. Yes, I know what my name looks like.
3. Yes, but the medication helps immensely.

2LT/RS IBM/gray #21,895 ordered April 21st, delivered July 3rd
MontyCarlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 12:18 PM   #19
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackonblack2010 View Post
Thats because it was a Charger before it became a Challenger. There was a write up in Car and Driver about why they where able to get the Challenger out before the Camaro. They chopped up a Charger. Thats why I don't like the Challenger. It isn't a new car, just a new look for the Charger.
you can thank daimler for that. the challenger was suppose to be on an all new platform but they didnt have the cash for it. either way i think they did an amazing job with what they were given and beat chevy to the punch .
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 12:50 PM   #20
1bad65
Banned
 
Drives: 2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,148
As for the comfortable seats, I think it's because Dodge is targeting older guys with the Challengers. Most guys I see driving them are in their 50s, and once on another forum the Challenger guys posted their ages and most were past middle age. My dad is in his early 60s, and the first time he saw one he said it was just a beautiful car.
1bad65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 01:06 PM   #21
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by SA CHEVY View Post
I drove and picked apart the SS and the SRT8 on a Sunday one right after the other and was thorough with them both. I agree with what you said on the interior on the Challenger being the complaint with me but feel different on why. I was upset on the Challenger's interior because it's the same as their Charger SRT8's interior...I'm disappointed in Dodge for putting all this time and effort to really match the old Challenger's body and the looks and then throw an interior they already had on the line into the car. I also agree with what has been said in here that when you drive the Challenger it just feels heavy and a little sluggish. The seats in those things are really comfortable though and agreed that the pistol grip is awesome...all in all after tearing it and the Camaro down and building the pro's between both back up the Camaro won in my book and is why it ended up in my garage. Then again I am a Chevy guy so my decision was a little biased but I've never been happier with a car I've purchased...and it's always a nice thing pulling up at the light and knowing yours is bigger

Just an fyi, the CHallenger interior basically shares only the steering wheel and switchgear with the CHarger, the actual design is actually remiscent of the origional 1970 model.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 01:08 PM   #22
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackonblack2010 View Post
Thats because it was a Charger before it became a Challenger. There was a write up in Car and Driver about why they where able to get the Challenger out before the Camaro. They chopped up a Charger. Thats why I don't like the Challenger. It isn't a new car, just a new look for the Charger.
Actually it shares the CHargers basic structure yes, but the suspension tuning, extrerior, interior and even weheelbase (4 inches shorter) is different than the charger.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 01:37 PM   #23
2010 SSRS



 
2010 SSRS's Avatar
 
Drives: 3 V8 Camaros
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Ocean State
Posts: 111,186
My Camaro leather interior is one of the most comfortable interiors I have ever sat in.
__________________
Jannetty Racing JRE Street Package
2010 SSRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 01:58 PM   #24
bigearl
 
bigearl's Avatar
 
Drives: 10 Camaro 2lt
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Napa
Posts: 553
I agree that I don't like the gauge cluster and steering wheel on the Dodge, but the fit and finish actually seemed pretty good and sturdy.
bigearl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 03:31 PM   #25
ViperTomcat
Banned
 
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
Actually it shares the CHargers basic structure yes, but the suspension tuning, extrerior, interior and even weheelbase (4 inches shorter) is different than the charger.

LX Platform- Charger, 300, Magnum.

LC Platform-Challenger.

Similar design, but not the same. Throwing the "just a reskinned" blah blah isnt correct. It's about as wrong as me saying that the Camaro is just a differently configured and built Holden Monaro.
ViperTomcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 05:43 PM   #26
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViperTomcat View Post
LX Platform- Charger, 300, Magnum.

LC Platform-Challenger.

Similar design, but not the same. Throwing the "just a reskinned" blah blah isnt correct. It's about as wrong as me saying that the Camaro is just a differently configured and built Holden Monaro.
+1000000000
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 11:05 PM   #27
Legend
Hello!
 
Legend's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 JSB Z06!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,624
I'll agree with those defending the Challenger...before we owned one I would have been quick to say the same as a few here have.

It's not anything like I thought they were...very nice to say the least!

Only a few things I would change about the Challenger...there are a few things I would change about the Camaro too.

Both very nice cars, different but the same if that makes sense.
Legend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 10:06 AM   #28
JerseyMonte
 
JerseyMonte's Avatar
 
Drives: 1972 Z28
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern New Jersey
Posts: 346
I liked it but --

I liked the Challenger but not enough to buy one,
I guess the low sales indicate many feel the same.
The owner of the Dodge liked my 2SS too.
But most important, we are both very happy with what we have
JerseyMonte is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stock SRT Challenger Dyno's 420 to the wheels. GatorBlue371 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 33 03-13-2009 10:46 AM
Challenger Priced Design1stCode2nd General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 176 09-08-2008 08:33 PM
MT: Challenger and Camaro face a case of bad timing Scotsman General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 16 06-03-2008 02:45 PM
Camaro v. Challenger Casull Chevy Camaro vs... 53 08-23-2007 11:49 PM
Ontario to become home of the all-new 2008 Dodge Challenger Mr. Wyndham General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 3 08-09-2007 03:54 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.