You are browsing camaro6 
03-17-2016, 04:01 PM
|
#15 |
    
Drives: GM Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Marydel, DE
Posts: 1,321
|
With 640 HP I would be very disappointed if the auto didn't run 11.2 or less. The SS has gone 11.9/11.8.
__________________
Roto- Fab Cai, SLP 1 3/4" headers, 3"X pipe, LM2 cat back, Comp Cam & AI Heads, SLP UP, RPM Tuned, GPI Intake, Vmax TB, ADM Air Scoop, 3.91 Gears, Gforce driveshaft, Braille 21#, Elite Catch Can, Pfadt Tie Rods, Diff Bushings and Trailing arms, Eibach spings & sways, BMR cradle bushings, Nt555r's.
|
|
|
|
03-17-2016, 04:07 PM
|
#16 | |
     Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2016, 04:11 PM
|
#17 |
|
Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
|
My estimates:
645 HP/645 TQ 0-60: 3.7 seconds 1/4 Mile- A: 11.55 @ 121 M: 11.85 @ 119 MPH Ring: No time, MFR's are not allowed to release times at the moment I believe Weight: 3,920lbs A 3,905lbs M 17/25 A 15/22 M W/ GG. |
|
|
|
|
03-17-2016, 04:50 PM
|
#18 |
|
Drives: 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,052
|
Ok, with what we now know about the ZL1. What are your predictions?
I was expecting the ZL1 to be a couple tenths quicker than the CTS-V which ran an 11.6 @ 126. Now, with the 2 extra gears, I'm thinking this thing will legitimately run 11.1 @ 128 on street tires. I have no doubt this will be a 10 second car on drag radials. In fact, I think it'll run 10s stock. I know, it sounds crazy, but consider this... my own ZL1 has gone 11.5s stock. The new car with 4 additional gears, 200 lbs lighter, and another "60" hp...
__________________
'17 ZL1 10.99@129 stock. 4225# raceweight. Best 60'- 1.66 on factory tires. 10.48@132 E50, intake and tune. 4270 lbs
https://youtu.be/EyHtdH9XOkY https://youtu.be/Lcu41obbTf8 '13 ZL1 BRM A6. 11.591 @ 119.2 factory stock with a 1.68 60'! Best stock mph 121.8. 11.29 @ 123 RotoFab, drag radials and skinnies. 4360# raceweight. http://youtu.be/yggIA3C_kkA 2014... back to stock http://youtu.be/spQLaTWbThs 2013... stock & RotoFab |
|
|
|
|
03-17-2016, 04:56 PM
|
#19 |
|
HAMMER PILOT
Drives: 13 ZL1#182, 85 CJ7, 16 Silverado Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 4,386
|
I started a thread below with guess the specs, kind of the same.
__________________
 "DO YOU WANT ME TO PUT THE HAMMER DOWN?" |
|
|
|
|
03-17-2016, 04:58 PM
|
#20 |
|
Drives: GM Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Marydel, DE
Posts: 1,321
|
Your asking us lol? If I remember you nailed the SS prediction with possible high 11's. If the Z doesn't go low 11's high 10's I would be disappointed. To me it seems GM doesn't try hard enough sometimes on their drag times.They always seem to leave a few tenths on the table.
__________________
Roto- Fab Cai, SLP 1 3/4" headers, 3"X pipe, LM2 cat back, Comp Cam & AI Heads, SLP UP, RPM Tuned, GPI Intake, Vmax TB, ADM Air Scoop, 3.91 Gears, Gforce driveshaft, Braille 21#, Elite Catch Can, Pfadt Tie Rods, Diff Bushings and Trailing arms, Eibach spings & sways, BMR cradle bushings, Nt555r's.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2016, 04:59 PM
|
#21 |
|
Drives: 17 SS a8 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
|
I like your stock tire et. I would say 10.7x on dr's with good weather but that doesn't account for the trans. maybe 10.5 hero run dr's only.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2016, 05:03 PM
|
#22 |
|
Drives: 69 GTO, 05 GTO, 2018 Silver ZL1 Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Springfield, OH
Posts: 847
|
I have a sneeky feeling that the LT4 in the ZL1 will be exactly like the LT1 in the SS.
My feelings have 0 proof right now, but I think the Camaro group pulled a Fast one on the Corvette group. They knew the Camaro drivetrain was more efficient....and they went with lower HP and TQ numbers, knowing that the Camaro motors were going to make more. I expect the ZL1 to make 15 more HP than the Z06....and the Corvette crowd will go nuts!  lol
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2016, 05:06 PM
|
#23 |
Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
|
I'm guessing it would run similar times / mph's as a '13 GT500 6spd vs 6spd.
As for the auto, I doubt the 10 spd would be much if any performance upgrade in a straight line due to the amount of TQ the engine makes.
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtqT56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear Last edited by Zeke.Malvo; 03-17-2016 at 06:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
03-17-2016, 05:07 PM
|
#24 | |
Drives: 2016 F150 Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2016, 05:09 PM
|
#25 |
   Drives: Love the one you're with Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Downtown Charlie Brown
Posts: 11,850
|
I predict that it will kick ass.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2016, 05:13 PM
|
#26 | |
|
Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
|
Quote:
On the manual? Total spitball. High HP cars are tough to estimate with manuals. That and the car, with driver, will likely be right around 4,000lbs depending on fuel state. |
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2016, 06:21 PM
|
#27 |
|
Drives: 2016 F150 Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
|
The CTS-V has been tested between 122-126.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2016, 06:37 PM
|
#28 | |
|
Drives: 17 SS a8 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
