|
|
#15 |
|
Moderator.ca
|
Taking care of an engine is always a good idea. But never driving a car to its potential is a shame to the engineers who worked on it. And while modern engines may not need to be broken in the practice never hurts
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
What can being careful do, besides waste a few miles of potential fun?
I say take it easy on any car for the first 500 miles, or however long after that it takes the brakes to become naturally soft(if you've ever driven a brand new car: you know what I mean)....as in, a 500 mile road trip doesn't count :p. No high rpms...which means naturally, no quick acceleration all the time. But I don't understand what a sustained speed can do to an engine that's harmful... ![]() Whether it actually does anything...that's how I treat all my new cars...and will continue to do so. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
MOD SQUAD
|
Part of this is true and the later is BIG TIME BS… The truth comes from the days of hydraulic lifters. Most all hydraulic cams and lifter have a brake in period of about 30 minutes, and in that 30 minutes you want to vary your RPM’s from 1500 to 3500, staying at one RPM for only a couple of minutes at a time (up and down, up and down). Bet you could never find that in your owners manual... Once your 30 minutes is up, change the oil and drive it like your going to normally dive it… So yes, if you have a heavy foot, drive it that way. If you putt around like a sissy everywhere you go, then putt you sissy. If it’s going to brake it’s going to brake… All you are doing is delaying the inevitable. If the engine was put together right you should have no problems (excluding catastrophic failure due to inferior parts/over revving like a jackass, Oh, and of course spontaneous human combustion, poor uncle Jed…) Then once you reach 500 miles on your new power plant, change the oil again.
Nowadays, most engines come with roller cam and rockers so they don’t need a brake-in period, drive it like you normally would drive it… Like I said, If its going to break, it’ll break, babying it is only going to delay you’re catastrophic failures at 500 and one quarter miles…
__________________
Who cares about the Blue Oval crowd and their little Ponys? We're getting our Camaro back-and it'll be Supercharged!-MDAII Team LS3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
the LS's have hydraulic lifters....don't they?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Follower of CHRIST!
Drives: 2005 Mazda RX8 Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central FL
Posts: 299
|
I've been through this with my RX8, and per Mazda they don't want you to drive at the same speed/rpm for extended periods of time or maxing out the RPM's (9K in the RX8) for the first 500 miles.
What did I do? I followed the easy break in plan of a major rotary engine expert which was even more conservative than Mazda's....give or take 500 miles. What I actually did, was avoid the same speed/rpm for long periods of time for the first 1K and I never hit 9K (I didn't go over 6K) until I hit 1.5K. I agree with what some have said...go easy on the car for that first 1-2K then let it lose. It pays off...
__________________
A GM V8 in every home....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro SS Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 2,259
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: V8 american car Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,417
|
Quote:
Last edited by 2001ragtop; 10-30-2007 at 01:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
MOD SQUAD
|
TAG, I think I need your little bloody head-banging icon…
![]() Yes, but they are hydraulic roller lifters. Good question...
__________________
Who cares about the Blue Oval crowd and their little Ponys? We're getting our Camaro back-and it'll be Supercharged!-MDAII Team LS3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
www.Camaro5store.com
|
Lol...since I like this one so much, here ya go...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
What did I say?!?! :eek: :o
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Instigator
Drives: 93 Z28, 70 Chevelle SS 97 Expo Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kandahar, Afghanistan/St. Louis will always be home though.
Posts: 192
|
WOW. I have heard the whole you have to break it in for the first... yada yada yada. I bought my RSX Type-S new and broke it in just a little different. As soon as I pulled off the parking lot I ran it through all the gears pretty hard. Now I didn't redline it or try and blow the motor, but I drove it harder then I expected to drive it. Just for the first few miles. For a couple reasons:
1. Because if it's gonna break it's gonna break. Might as well catch it while it's under warranty. 2. Because you don't want to break your car in and then drive it harder then you broke it in. That can't be any better then running it hard from the start. The components aren't gonna be used to your normal driving. 3. Because you're "breaking the motor it" not "babying the motor in". 4. Because I HAD TO!!! It may have been a ricer, import, what ever you wanna say about it. I never claimed it was fast. Only that it was "quick". I miss that car, it was a blast to drive. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 550+RWHP 2010 camaro Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 1,588
|
yes but they are roller,, roller cam engines do not need any break in time,, run them hard right away,, you will not hurt anything i have built several roller cam engines for my vehicles and i have no problem starting a new engine, running it through a couple heat cycles and then run it wide open
__________________
415ci stroker, TVS 2300 Magnacharger, cnc heads, cam, yank ss3200 converter, Kooks long tubes, Bwoody true cold air kit, ZL1 Pump, magnaflow 3" cat-back, lowering springs,BMR control arms and tie rod bars, 3.73 gears, diff mounts, RX can, ADM fuel controller
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GM chooses a Western New York Plant for New Diesel Engine | Mr. Wyndham | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 12 | 06-06-2009 09:47 AM |
| Camaro ls3 news...true or false? | Dark Knight | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 74 | 06-05-2008 06:29 PM |
| 5th Gen Camaro LS3 info from Chevy Hi-Po...READ | TAG UR IT | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 295 | 03-07-2008 11:06 AM |
| Gotcha! 'Gen V' Engine Details... DOHC! | LSxcellent | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 28 | 10-10-2007 04:23 PM |
| Axial Vector Engine | Mr. Wyndham | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 6 | 06-20-2007 05:00 PM |