|
|
#3571 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
The 5.0 is no where near maxed out in factory form. I will agree that it will take a good bit of money and someone that is knowledgeable on the OHC motors from ford to start getting decent power in NA form.
We have already seen DOHC Ford 5.0L engines making over 500rwhp. Admittedly not the same as the 5.0 going in the GT and these were racing applications. And I readily admit that the 6.2 will make more power with full bolt-ons than the 5.0L. It should it has 1.2L more to work with. The weight advantage simply means the camaro will need to make around 30 more rwhp than the 5.0 to keep the power-to-weight ratio roughly the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3572 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: C63 P31 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Posts: 767
|
Quote:
I didn't know you can get 590 fwhp (164 fwhp gain) with heads and a cam. That's about a 130 rwhp gain. Intake and exhaust don't add very much. I'm just saying, I think that's on the high side. But I don't know, maybe you're talking about a crazy aggressive heads and cam package. Wouldn't that greatly take away from the streetability though? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3573 | |
|
Get me my meds!
Drives: 2010 SS/RS M6 & solid black, baby! Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maple Valley, Wa.
Posts: 279
|
Quote:
__________________
Mods: ADM race CAI, Vector tune, ARH headers, Borla 'S' types, Revolution hood & chin, MGW short-shifter, T-Rex phantom grille
![]() The legend continues... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3574 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: C63 P31 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Posts: 767
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3575 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3576 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Quote:
At that hp the stangs that can get grip should run low into the 11s and possibly high 10s. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3577 |
![]() ![]() Drives: C63 P31 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Posts: 767
|
Yeah, I've been in a ride in one of them (L99) with a pretty good amount of boost (not sure how much, but more than 9 psi) and it was scary fast. It wasn't loud, it was just throw you back in your seat, lightening fast. And slowing down caused a lot of force. Just crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3578 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
My friends GT500 puts down 826rwhp and that thing is just scary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3579 |
![]() ![]() Drives: C63 P31 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Posts: 767
|
The site is probably talking about 1000 flywheel horsepower, which when applied to an L99 equals 800 rwhp. And I know of someone that has taken their Kenne Bell kit on a stock L99 up to like 16-17 psi of boost on race gas and ran a 10.9 quarter mile, which would have been 10.5 corrected. So, it's possible, but not safe for longevity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3580 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: C63 P31 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Posts: 767
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3581 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3582 |
![]() ![]() Drives: C63 P31 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Posts: 767
|
That's insane. I know this is kind of off subject, but when I think of 826 rwhp, I wonder how safe it is to drive on city streets. What happens if you quickly try to pass another car and there is kind of good amount of traffic. Wouldn't you just roast your tires and turn sideways with even half throttle?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3583 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Challenger R/T;2011 Mustang GT Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,105
|
Quote:
Intake is good for 15WHP Exhaust is good for 35WHP Cam is good for 80WHP Porting is good for 25WHP This is all with a tune. Pretty easy to get 500WHP with those mods. Picking the correct combination is critical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3584 |
![]() ![]() Drives: C63 P31 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Posts: 767
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Camaro VS Mustang Mega Thread | Beau Tie | Chevy Camaro vs... | 3644 | 03-09-2012 08:45 PM |
| Gran Turismo 5... No Camaro? | 5thGenOwner | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 111 | 12-06-2011 11:06 AM |
| Official 2011 Mustang GT info released | nester7929 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 81 | 12-28-2009 04:13 PM |