The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-19-2014, 04:57 PM   #197
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
Quote:
Originally Posted by Q'smuscle View Post
Thanx ! I thought so! But I was hoping there was some insight on the 6th Gen!
Well....there is insight right? I mean he did say it was shrinking, so for the movie version, they made it bigger. That tells me the 6th gen will be smaller.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline  
Old 06-19-2014, 05:07 PM   #198
BaylorCamaro
Track > 1/4 Mile
 
BaylorCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 C7 Z51
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 6,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
Well....there is insight right? I mean he did say it was shrinking, so for the movie version, they made it bigger. That tells me the 6th gen will be smaller.
BaylorCamaro is offline  
Old 06-19-2014, 06:19 PM   #199
Q'smuscle
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro VR 2SS/RS & Impala
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Riverside,ca
Posts: 5,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
Well....there is insight right? I mean he did say it was shrinking, so for the movie version, they made it bigger. That tells me the 6th gen will be smaller.
True! which we all thought !
Quote:
Originally Posted by 87GNX View Post
For the 6th gen? Smaller and lighter.
But wider?
Q'smuscle is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 01:54 AM   #200
VADER SS L99


 
VADER SS L99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
There are still some fanboys in denial who think the Mustang didn't and isn't gaining any weight. They think those leaked weights are for fully optioned models.
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
VADER SS L99 is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 02:26 AM   #201
archtaan
 
Drives: car
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by VADER SS L99 View Post
There are still some fanboys in denial who think the Mustang didn't and isn't gaining any weight. They think those leaked weights are for fully optioned models.

Even though it clearly states "base weight" I still say a GT Premium with glass roof & upgraded sound system will push close 3900#s.
archtaan is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 12:06 PM   #202
big hammer

 
Drives: 2002 ws6
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
even the mustang crew over there is calling the pill retarded.

and he thinks the new Camaro is going to gain weight because the mustang did

a lot of the reasons the mustang gained weight is because of IRS and safety regulations. things the current Camaro already has. the mustang gt premium will be around the same weight as the Camaro.

it would be cool if on the last year of the 5th gen, they threw an lt1 in it.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
big hammer is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 05:23 PM   #203
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by big hammer View Post
even the mustang crew over there is calling the pill retarded.

and he thinks the new Camaro is going to gain weight because the mustang did

a lot of the reasons the mustang gained weight is because of IRS and safety regulations. things the current Camaro already has. the mustang gt premium will be around the same weight as the Camaro.

it would be cool if on the last year of the 5th gen, they threw an lt1 in it.
It's funny to read the threads over there. They are all banking on the Camaro sharing the LWB Alpha platform with the CTS so it will weigh more. If the 2016 SS weighs close to the 2015 GT, it will have a considerable torque, and most likely slight horsepower advantage. All it takes is for GM to make wise decisions with the 6th gen and it should be a very good car.
Bhobbs is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 05:31 PM   #204
MEDISIN

 
Drives: 2011 CTS-V Sedan
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 1,505
I don't think the slight weight gain is going to impact Mustang performance. Even if they don't do anything with the 5.0, it's going to be an improved overall car. The one piece Ford has been missing is a suitable chassis, everything else is already there. I suspect people will be pleasantly surprised at track performance. Team Camaro is going to really have to do its homework for gen 6, weight savings or not.
MEDISIN is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 05:49 PM   #205
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEDISIN View Post
I don't think the slight weight gain is going to impact Mustang performance. Even if they don't do anything with the 5.0, it's going to be an improved overall car. The one piece Ford has been missing is a suitable chassis, everything else is already there. I suspect people will be pleasantly surprised at track performance. Team Camaro is going to really have to do its homework for gen 6, weight savings or not.
I agree that the Mustang should be a fantastic car. No doubt. I just don't care for the look. Its not bad...not great. I'm sure modded ones will look pretty mean, but when I first saw the Camaro it blew me away completely. The Mustang doesn't do that for me at all. MustangG6 site has up shots of the the red Mustang with white stripes used as a pace car. I think it looks almost boring. Sorry. Just my opinion. Maybe its those wheels on that pace car...they are my least favorite ones.

But GM has a lot going for it already. In my opinion the Alpha chassis and engine choices they have are slamdunks already. Just got to get the size, weight, and look right.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 05:57 PM   #206
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEDISIN View Post
I don't think the slight weight gain is going to impact Mustang performance. Even if they don't do anything with the 5.0, it's going to be an improved overall car. The one piece Ford has been missing is a suitable chassis, everything else is already there. I suspect people will be pleasantly surprised at track performance. Team Camaro is going to really have to do its homework for gen 6, weight savings or not.

I have no doubt it will be a great performing car but the reason the last gen performs so well against the current Camaro has a lot do with the weight advantage. It will have little to no weight advantage if GM doesn't try to make the 6th gen Camaro an ATS with a bowtie.
Bhobbs is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 06:27 PM   #207
big hammer

 
Drives: 2002 ws6
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
GM has the chassis and the means to build a 3600 pound Camaro, but it depends on which buyer demographic they're going after.

they can easily make the 6th gen outperform the mustang without getting to close to the performance of the vette.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
big hammer is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 07:02 PM   #208
khell86
 
Drives: 2012 Ford Focus
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 394
The alpha chassis is a great chassis, but I think the main reason its doing such a great job in regards to handling is the mag ride. Will that carry over to the 6th Gen camaro? If it does then yes, the new camaro will be amazing around the track.

I think the 6th gen will probably remain the same weight, based off of ATS weights and CTS weights. So the weight advantage will pretty much be gone for the mustang. I think in the end it'll come down to that mag ride.
khell86 is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 07:30 PM   #209
VADER SS L99


 
VADER SS L99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by khell86 View Post
The alpha chassis is a great chassis, but I think the main reason its doing such a great job in regards to handling is the mag ride. Will that carry over to the 6th Gen camaro? If it does then yes, the new camaro will be amazing around the track.

I think the 6th gen will probably remain the same weight, based off of ATS weights and CTS weights. So the weight advantage will pretty much be gone for the mustang. I think in the end it'll come down to that mag ride.
The magnetic ride control is only available on the high end expensive ATS models. If they want to offer it for the 6th gen as a option great, but I don't want it coming on the car standard. That just adds more weight and cost that I don't want to pay.

The 6th gen is going to lose weight. Its going to happen. The only question is how much. If GM polled every 5th gen owner who knew anything about their car and asked them what would you change, one of the first responses would be weight. Same goes for all the magazine testers. If the 6th gen doesn't lose weight it will be a big epic fail.
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
VADER SS L99 is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 08:02 PM   #210
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEDISIN View Post
I don't think the slight weight gain is going to impact Mustang performance. Even if they don't do anything with the 5.0, it's going to be an improved overall car. The one piece Ford has been missing is a suitable chassis, everything else is already there. I suspect people will be pleasantly surprised at track performance. Team Camaro is going to really have to do its homework for gen 6, weight savings or not.
If the timing is still what is being speculated as a 2016, then the homework is done and the test is submitted. Car would be well over 80% done by now to be a 2016 and at this point you aren't taking out any more weight. Die would be as they say, already cast.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
I have no doubt it will be a great performing car but the reason the last gen performs so well against the current Camaro has a lot do with the weight advantage. It will have little to no weight advantage if GM doesn't try to make the 6th gen Camaro an ATS with a bowtie.
Think of it this way. My new SS is about the same size and HP as a CTS V-Sport. It has a lot of bells and whistles that a Camaro doesn't have or didn't have at launch. The CTS V-sport is a far nicer car with a 4 year 50k warranty and a "would you like a loaner car with that oil change, SIR" every time. It can't be a Cadillac even if it is piled with features. As much as I love my SS it isn't a V-sport and it's well over $20,000 less for nearly the same performance. It's the upgrade in materials, service and experience that now make a Cadillac, not technology.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
Number 3 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.