|
|
#1 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
new mustang slower than old 5.0, bad wheel hop
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 SIM 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 5,902
|
http://www.mustang6g.com/?p=2992 ..... That car is no slouch
__________________
2011 2SS/RS built 8/24/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 4 wheels Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: anyplace, USA
Posts: 1,177
|
Real close. I don't think anyone from Ford ever claimed the '15 would be faster, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9 Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
|
I figured ever since the first video with rear suspension upgrades that ford was hiding the wheel hop issue but doing it in plain sight by calling it "marketing" for there aftermarket parts.(hope I'm wrong) Seems like the boost in power offset the weight so that's a plus cause other then 1 or 2 videos so far the mph is still strong.
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 SIM 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 5,902
|
Here's the video for that run
__________________
2011 2SS/RS built 8/24/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,241
|
News flash-
Manuals are harder to launch at a drag strip, IRS suffers from wheel hop problems. I know you're shocked, I am too /sarcasm. Considering a bone stock, unbroken in auto GT with 20's and 3.15's ran a 12.8 with 87 octane fuel, it's safe to say this car isn't going to be a slowpoke. I'm guessing auto base GT's with proper fuel and 3.55's will be running 12.6's or so bone stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9 Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
|
Quote:
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 4 Wheels, Gasoline Engine Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Drives: 97' A4, 08' Mustang, 15' Legacy Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: TX
Posts: 114
|
Mustangs on average will likely remain faster through the 1/4. From base to premium models. Camaro owners will have a glass ceiling (or another excuse) so long as the Corvette is in town.
If Ford Racing had something to hide their wouldn't be drag components available in the first place . In the end the enthusiasts win as we are having fun watching and racing this new platform as the die hard Bowties on here continue to reach and bait anyone willing to bite.Say what you will, but when it comes to Camaro and Mustang... Ford engineers wait for no one. From retro to classic, track oriented packages to full blown at a premium. If an update comes around the time of the 6th gen Camaro, please, don't take it personal because this pony is the originator and in some eyes two steps ahead of the game. I say this in the least confrontational way I possibly can. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
Quote:
yeah seeing as how the old 5.0 and the Camaro were a drivers race, and the new 5.0 is slower... makes sense that the new mustang will be faster.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Track > 1/4 Mile
|
The new Mustang had a marginal weight gain and a marginal power pump but switched to IRS. I do not know why anyone is surprised that it's running close the same times as the 2014s.
It's definitely going to handle A LOT better.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Drives: 97' A4, 08' Mustang, 15' Legacy Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: TX
Posts: 114
|
Speaking of handling, A/T Ecoboost with PP is only 2 seconds slower than a 13' 5.0L Track Pack around Willow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro 2ss Join Date: May 2013
Location: nj
Posts: 1,559
|
And the 15 GT with PP is slower than the 1Le
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|