The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-10-2014, 02:30 PM   #43
ChrisBlair
Buick 455 Fan
 
Drives: 1970 Buick, 2012 1SS LS3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 5,957
I had a '78 Firebird Formula with that same 305. I won't say it was bad...but the only thing it was faster than was the changing of seasons
__________________
ChrisBlair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 06:07 PM   #44
Muscle Car Memories

 
Muscle Car Memories's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro 1SS,6 Speed,NPP Exhaust
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by 87GNX View Post
Forget what you read and find out the right way...stock for stock the 5.0 is faster..even camaro owners like myself found out eventually. I wont get into which engine is better. No slips, its faster...trust me
Trust me I also know, I just sold a 2013 5.0 Mustang to get this 2014 SS. The Camaro is alot stronger down low, Mustang 5.0 screams on top however if they weighed the same the outcome would be close...I like'em both.
Muscle Car Memories is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 06:08 PM   #45
Muscle Car Memories

 
Muscle Car Memories's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro 1SS,6 Speed,NPP Exhaust
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisBlair View Post
I had a '78 Firebird Formula with that same 305. I won't say it was bad...but the only thing it was faster than was the changing of seasons
The 305 was a JOKE....no wonder it doesnt exist anymore. That engine should be right up there with those aluminum Vega motors....
Muscle Car Memories is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 04:27 PM   #46
HeavyIOM
 
HeavyIOM's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS, 2000 Pontiac Formula
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muscle Car Memories View Post
Your wrong about the Coyote's "hunting SS Camaro's" one at a time, we all know the LS3 has more power all around its just a matter of about 300lbs with the Camaro. From everything ive seen and read the race between a Coyote and a LS3 is a drivers race, one slip and it can go either way.


Stop reading and go out and find out for yourself...I can read all day long how a bolt on Civic SI can beat a SS or 5.0, doesn't make it true though.

Technically any race is a drivers race. I beat a GT500 in my wife's V6 Camaro. Is the V6 the faster car? No, but that guy couldn't drive so I beat him. So I guess I can say a V6 Camaro and a GT500 is a drivers race.
HeavyIOM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 04:32 PM   #47
Muscle Car Memories

 
Muscle Car Memories's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro 1SS,6 Speed,NPP Exhaust
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by calebparkin3 View Post
Stop reading and go out and find out for yourself...I can read all day long how a bolt on Civic SI can beat a SS or 5.0, doesn't make it true though.

Technically any race is a drivers race. I beat a GT500 in my wife's V6 Camaro. Is the V6 the faster car? No, but that guy couldn't drive so I beat him. So I guess I can say a V6 Camaro and a GT500 is a drivers race.
IF you beat a GT500 with a V6 Camaro you should be awarded member of the year and I doubt thats happening anytime soon cause its a lie what you said.

Im not goin out and "finding out" anything, ive both the 5.0 and the SS so I know firsthand and not from a blowhard on C5
Muscle Car Memories is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 04:56 PM   #48
HeavyIOM
 
HeavyIOM's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS, 2000 Pontiac Formula
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muscle Car Memories View Post
IF you beat a GT500 with a V6 Camaro you should be awarded member of the year and I doubt thats happening anytime soon cause its a lie what you said.

Im not goin out and "finding out" anything, ive both the 5.0 and the SS so I know firsthand and not from a blowhard on C5


I'm sorry were you there at the track that day watching the pass? Am I mistaken that my 9.4 is faster than his 9.7? If I am wrong and a 9.4 is slower than a 9.7 I apologize. It's not my fault that he blew the tires off on the launch, or missed second. I didn't beat the car I beat the driver (drivers race).

I too have owned both 5.0 and SS at the same time no less...I can tell you without a doubt the 5.0 is faster than a SS with equal drivers.
HeavyIOM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 05:08 PM   #49
Muscle Car Memories

 
Muscle Car Memories's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro 1SS,6 Speed,NPP Exhaust
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by calebparkin3 View Post
I'm sorry were you there at the track that day watching the pass? Am I mistaken that my 9.4 is faster than his 9.7? If I am wrong and a 9.4 is slower than a 9.7 I apologize. It's not my fault that he blew the tires off on the launch, or missed second. I didn't beat the car I beat the driver (drivers race).

I too have owned both 5.0 and SS at the same time no less...I can tell you without a doubt the 5.0 is faster than a SS with equal drivers.
Yea damn sorry I missed that race...yes the 5.0 is faster because it weighs less, you get a good driver against a so-so 5.0 driver then the SS wins thats all im saying. End of discussion by me.
Muscle Car Memories is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 06:32 PM   #50
Muscle Car Lover


 
Muscle Car Lover's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 2SS M6 "CHRISTINE"
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Boston Metro North
Posts: 2,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisBlair View Post
The financing companies. They never lose.


Yup!

My heart never stopped nor did I ever feel like I would sell a finger or two just to have a Mustang. Several Camaro models I have, the latest iteration most certainly. It's all about personal preference.

Some guys think the AMC AMX was the baddest pony car ever. And if they want to drive one, I think that's just aces for them.
__________________
"But, House Mormont remembers. The North remembers! We know no King but the King of the North whose name is Stark. I don't care if he's a bastard. Ned Stark's blood runs through his veins. He's my king–from this day until his last day."

Mods: ARH headers and hi flow cats, VMAX ported throttle body, CAI air intake, Slowhawk Performance tuning
Muscle Car Lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 08:09 PM   #51
SEVEN-OH JOE
Account Suspended
 
Drives: some to distraction
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 627
Quote:
Originally Posted by big hammer View Post
yup. when the mustang was out of production for a while. the mustang II was also a compact car and not a pony car.

Uh...remember PINTO, the basis for the Mustang II? I can assure you Ford dealers targeted Camaro-Firebird (and Cuda-Challenger, initially) buyers. V8s, '75-on, certainly had buyers thinking they were buying a "pony car".

stopping production of the Camaro was not about lack of sales. actually the Camaro\firebird combo was the second best selling cars in it's class. the real reason gm temporarily stopped production of the Camaro was because they badly needed to close the expensive to operate plant in quebec, which had a contract to build the Camaro until around 2017 or so. so as long as they were building a Camaro, they legally had to build it in quebec. the only other option was to cease building the Camaro until they could shut down and dispose of the quebec plant.
The day Ste. Therese closed, the average cost for GM to build vehicles in Canada-USA went UP! And that tidbit came from upper-level GM-Detroit, at that time.

Ste. Therese was, in FACT, the lowest-cost non-Mexican assembly facility GM had in North America...because of Government subsidy. Quebec got burned more than once. Do a google on "Hyundai Bromont".
SEVEN-OH JOE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 10:29 AM   #52
shine2013
 
shine2013's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Mustang GT
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Memphis
Posts: 378
Sales it's the Mustang. The performance I think it's a slight edge to the Camaro at best, but overall it's even.

The gen 3s looked nice, but from what I've seen gen 3 Mustangs ate them alive.

The Gen 4 Mustangs looked better, but the Camaros ate them until the Terminators came out.

Gen 5 Camaro killed the Mustangs until the 5.0, but Chevy has been upping the ante with different models.

I've read people say weight is what kills the Camaro, but what I've seen at the track is that it's a drivers race.
shine2013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 11:43 PM   #53
big hammer

 
Drives: 2002 ws6
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by 87GNX View Post
Wrong on an idiotic level!
completely correct, actually. not one single quick mustang gt was produced until 2011.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
big hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 11:45 PM   #54
big hammer

 
Drives: 2002 ws6
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEVEN-OH JOE View Post
The day Ste. Therese closed, the average cost for GM to build vehicles in Canada-USA went UP! And that tidbit came from upper-level GM-Detroit, at that time.

Ste. Therese was, in FACT, the lowest-cost non-Mexican assembly facility GM had in North America...because of Government subsidy. Quebec got burned more than once. Do a google on "Hyundai Bromont".
wrong. quebec is an insane place to do business. in fact, speaking English is considered evil. everything must be translated.

there's a reason we were being bombarded with 5th gen proto pics shortly after the plant closed. it was in the plans all along.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
big hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 11:46 PM   #55
big hammer

 
Drives: 2002 ws6
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muscle Car Memories View Post
The 305 was a JOKE....no wonder it doesnt exist anymore. That engine should be right up there with those aluminum Vega motors....
yet it made more power than the mustang in the 80's.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
big hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 11:50 PM   #56
big hammer

 
Drives: 2002 ws6
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
You do realize the original Mustang was based on Ford's economy car too, right? All of your posts show a serious lack of any knowledge. the Mustang GT was quicker than ANY Camaro through the 80s and until 92, the 3V GTs weren't that far off an LS1s average pace (let's be honest, the ones running 12s were factory freaks and most were mid 13s or worse), And the 03-09 Mustang Gt was CERTAINLY quicker than it's Camaro counterpart. hell, I would say there were versions of the Mustang II that were quicker than their overweight counterparts with their neutered V8s, especially in the late 70s. the Mustang NEVER ceased production and really the mustang 2 returned the Mustang to it's roots of smaller, lighter, cheaper, and based on Ford's economy car. It was the 70s for Christ Sakes, everything was neutered........
the trans am destroyed the mustang in the 80's.

the 3v gt's were jokes. nearly a second slower than the ls1. and yes, the mustang ceased production from 74-78. in 79 the mustang returned and the mustang II was discontinued.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
big hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.