|
|
#43 |
|
Buick 455 Fan
Drives: 1970 Buick, 2012 1SS LS3 Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 5,957
|
I had a '78 Firebird Formula with that same 305. I won't say it was bad...but the only thing it was faster than was the changing of seasons
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 Camaro 1SS,6 Speed,NPP Exhaust Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,842
|
Trust me I also know, I just sold a 2013 5.0 Mustang to get this 2014 SS. The Camaro is alot stronger down low, Mustang 5.0 screams on top however if they weighed the same the outcome would be close...I like'em both.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 Camaro 1SS,6 Speed,NPP Exhaust Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,842
|
Quote:
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 SS, 2000 Pontiac Formula Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 509
|
Quote:
Stop reading and go out and find out for yourself...I can read all day long how a bolt on Civic SI can beat a SS or 5.0, doesn't make it true though. Technically any race is a drivers race. I beat a GT500 in my wife's V6 Camaro. Is the V6 the faster car? No, but that guy couldn't drive so I beat him. So I guess I can say a V6 Camaro and a GT500 is a drivers race.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 Camaro 1SS,6 Speed,NPP Exhaust Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,842
|
Quote:
Im not goin out and "finding out" anything, ive both the 5.0 and the SS so I know firsthand and not from a blowhard on C5 ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 SS, 2000 Pontiac Formula Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 509
|
Quote:
I'm sorry were you there at the track that day watching the pass? Am I mistaken that my 9.4 is faster than his 9.7? If I am wrong and a 9.4 is slower than a 9.7 I apologize. It's not my fault that he blew the tires off on the launch, or missed second. I didn't beat the car I beat the driver (drivers race). I too have owned both 5.0 and SS at the same time no less...I can tell you without a doubt the 5.0 is faster than a SS with equal drivers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 Camaro 1SS,6 Speed,NPP Exhaust Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,842
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2014 2SS M6 "CHRISTINE" Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Boston Metro North
Posts: 2,916
|
![]() Yup! My heart never stopped nor did I ever feel like I would sell a finger or two just to have a Mustang. Several Camaro models I have, the latest iteration most certainly. It's all about personal preference. Some guys think the AMC AMX was the baddest pony car ever. And if they want to drive one, I think that's just aces for them.
__________________
"But, House Mormont remembers. The North remembers! We know no King but the King of the North whose name is Stark. I don't care if he's a bastard. Ned Stark's blood runs through his veins. He's my king–from this day until his last day."
Mods: ARH headers and hi flow cats, VMAX ported throttle body, CAI air intake, Slowhawk Performance tuning |
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: some to distraction Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 627
|
Quote:
Ste. Therese was, in FACT, the lowest-cost non-Mexican assembly facility GM had in North America...because of Government subsidy. Quebec got burned more than once. Do a google on "Hyundai Bromont". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
![]() Drives: 2008 Mustang GT Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Memphis
Posts: 378
|
Sales it's the Mustang. The performance I think it's a slight edge to the Camaro at best, but overall it's even.
The gen 3s looked nice, but from what I've seen gen 3 Mustangs ate them alive. The Gen 4 Mustangs looked better, but the Camaros ate them until the Terminators came out. Gen 5 Camaro killed the Mustangs until the 5.0, but Chevy has been upping the ante with different models. I've read people say weight is what kills the Camaro, but what I've seen at the track is that it's a drivers race. |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
completely correct, actually. not one single quick mustang gt was produced until 2011.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
Quote:
there's a reason we were being bombarded with 5th gen proto pics shortly after the plant closed. it was in the plans all along.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
yet it made more power than the mustang in the 80's.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
Quote:
the 3v gt's were jokes. nearly a second slower than the ls1. and yes, the mustang ceased production from 74-78. in 79 the mustang returned and the mustang II was discontinued.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|