|
|
#29 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
I never liked my fun to be safe anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() Drives: BLOWN CAMARO SS PORSCHE PANNY TURBO Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
eolson
Drives: 2006 premium Package Mustang GT cou Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northville, MI
Posts: 249
|
I wasn't bitching about the horsepower, I was just saying that for my tastes, 585 would be great with a lighter, more balanced car that solved the handling problems.
I assure you that if SVT would have gone all the way with solving the suspension and chassis issues and was also able to still upgrade the engine and produce 662HP, I would be a huge fan of that reality. Erik
__________________
2006 Prem Pkg Mustang GT coupe. Saleen SC,10psi, 454rwhp,442rwtq, Complete Steeda/H&R, suspension change out, with weight loss, Techco Watts link, Stoptech big brakes, Race clutch, Alum. flywheel, Alum 1 pc driveshaft, 9x18,10x18 chrome bullit wheels, 285/40/18,255/45/18 nitto 555 tires. 3545 lbs currently. New car scent air freshener.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mobile Al
Posts: 750
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Anthrax Popcorn User
Drives: 2013 GT500 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,286
|
I'd be a huge fan too, just unable to afford it.
We can debate to our hearts content, but these are still cars that are expensive for American pony cars, but bargains for the showroom performance they offer. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|