|
|
#1 |
![]() Drives: Don't have my Camaro YET Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 145
|
why is the charger left out of the big 3?
I've been seeing many camaros, mustangs and chargers today and it got me thinking. Chargers seem like a better fit than the challanger. Just looking at body shape and such.
Sorry if this is in the wrong spot to post this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Inferno Orange Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 15
|
I respectfully disagree
Great food for thought but I think the Challenger fits the mold better than the four door Chargers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Married
Drives: 2011 Camaro 1LT/RS Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
too (two) many doors
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Pull up Cougar!
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,875
|
It's 4 doors and isn't related to its heritage at all. It's an ok car but it should have never been called a charger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Drives: Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 188
|
Simple. Chargers are left out bc they have 4 doors.
4 door cars are not part of the muscle car/ pony car world. Period. How in the world does Challenger not "fit as well" as a Charger???? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Drives: Don't have my Camaro YET Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 145
|
Completely overlooked the 4 door thing...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 Dodge Charger Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 1,070
|
In my opinion the shape and body style doesn't matter that much, the new camaro doesn't look like the old ones yet it is still a muscle car. The challenger/mustangs closely resemble their counterparts from the late 60s and early 70s. The one thing that makes the charger not a muscle car is the number of doors.
__________________
2011 Dodge Charger
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '11 2SS, '11 C6 GS, '04 MDX Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kearney, MO
Posts: 2,907
|
Agree it's the door count.
I'm not a huge Challenger fan, but if the Charger is an indication of what Dodge is going then I think they have a strong future. The Charger is probably the best looking 4 door out there IMO. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 45th Anniversary 2SS LS3 Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,812
|
Definitely an issue with the 4 doors, but I'm not crazy about the rear end on the charger either. Not sure if I dislike the Mustank or Charger rear more..
Challenger is a gorgeous machine.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Drives: '11 1SS LS3 and '90 240sx hatch. Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 308
|
Plus I think the charger only comes in automatic >>
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Drives: 2014 Summit White 2ls Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 26
|
if i had to choose charger or challenger. challenger all day
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Space Shuttle Aficionado
|
Charger is a sedan, and many people don't think of a muscle car as a sedan. That's basically the only reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 45th Anniversary 2SS LS3 Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,812
|
I also believe this is the case. Why would they do that though?
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|