|
|
#15 |
|
Banned
Drives: 4 Wheels, Gasoline Engine Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 IBM 1SS (Former) Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,031
|
This. The Challenger is already a low volume car. I don't see Chrysler/SRT having two low volume cars that are as similar as the Cuda and Challenger were. Plus if there were to be a Cuda coming out at the end of 2013, we probably would've seen a camo'ed test mule by now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Drives: 2012 45th 2ss Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Idaho
Posts: 61
|
I can tell you, if they make this cuda and it looks as good as the challenger does, i will have one in my garage lol
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 AQUA BLUE CAMARO RS Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,193
|
I always have liked the Cuda better than the Challenger. I may actually consider one of these if the styling looks good that is. I still will probably go with a 6th gen Camaro instead but I will look at this Cuda for sure.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 5.7L Tundra Double-Cab X-SP Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 2,031
|
I'd consider that car. Looks like some weird fusion of a Viper/Camaro/somewhat of a Mustang rear end.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|