|
|
#5531 | |
|
Moderator.ca
|
Quote:
Now, how do you tell them apart from the side ....
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5532 |
![]() Drives: 2011 Dodge 3500 dually Mega Cab Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: discovery bay,ca
Posts: 667
|
It is really bugging me he said my best time was a 13.09 @ 110 when my best was a 12.79 @ 111 last night...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5533 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Thunderbird Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
|
I am personally more than a little skeptical myself, but I am not ready to call anybody a liar. That said, do remember that 1/4 mile trap speeds are probably artificially low in many of the manual transmission 1/4 mile times we have seen thus far because the 3.73:1 gears would seem to put the 5.0L on top of the rev limiter at about 112mph or so. In turn that would seem to indicate the possibility that folks are finding themselves riding through the traps bouncing off the rev limiter in third given the trap speeds we have been seeing
For this reason a lot of us think the fastest 2011 GT will be a Brembo equipped 5.0L with the 3.55:1 gears since that gear set will allow you to run through the traps in third without hitting the rev limiter. In fact, that will be exactly the package I buy in the next few months. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5534 |
![]() Drives: 2005 Mustang GT M5 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 95
|
doesn't really make sense to me........115 mph stock? thats WAYY outside of the normal statistical range for this car. if it was like 112.5 or 113 i'd be like yea maybe the track was really good that night........but 115? thats just WAYYY outside the next highest trap for that car and i'm quite skeptical to say the least. i'd love to believe the car can actually do that but yea im pretty sure that the car is NOT stock.
__________________
2005 Mustang GT
JLT2 CAI, Brenspeed 93 tune, Boomtube Axlebacks, Lowering Springs, Lakewood Panhard bar/brace.......296 RWHP/315 RWTQ 12.883@106.56 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5535 | |
![]() Drives: ex-500hp v6 mustang Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: arizona
Posts: 605
|
Quote:
dont think mike's car is tuned, but evo's is as they are testers for the new tuning software. the ET seems possible, but the 115 seems high, but he did trap 114 also, so maybe its not. and there arent many boltons even out yet lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5536 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5537 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Black & Blue 1SS Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Back In The Desert
Posts: 1,257
|
What does the gt500s trap stock? Don't they trap like 12.2 quarter mile
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5539 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Black & Blue 1SS Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Back In The Desert
Posts: 1,257
|
Cool well whatever happens we will see who has the fastest modded car down the road.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5540 |
|
"SLOMARO"
|
As much as it sucks that out of the gate the GT appears to be able to outrun the SS, it's all driver. I run my SS about once a month and still havent gotten into the 12's, but consistantly outrun a buddy with a 08 - Kenne Bell Blown - GT. He is dyno'ing at 467 to the tire and Im just knocking on the 400 door.. So Even if this car has got the guts, we will all be pretty even at the track until the third bulb burns. Then its up to the driver.. Bench racing is easy.. 1320 is a whole other ballgame.
__________________
Dyno'd before VARARAM TUNE unit at 390hp |
|
|
|
|
|
#5541 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Not much to driving an auto with traction control on.
I agree about the tree though. Win or lose races by it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5542 | |
|
"SLOMARO"
|
Quote:
Even the auto will require the right launch technique.. First pass ever and this guy is pulling 2.0 60' times.. He knows how to drive.. The R/T and the launch is everything.. Either way.. We'll see the true story on Friday and Saturday nights.. I love it..
__________________
Dyno'd before VARARAM TUNE unit at 390hp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5543 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 1LT RS Rally Yellow Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: southern Illinois
Posts: 2,973
|
Quote:
Also, his business or not, throwing that decal on the window is asking to be called out. I understand advertising himself, but on a car that isn't tuned by him? I don't know, to each their own. Besides, my car is a touch better then 312, lol... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5544 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
He said he launched the car at idle.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Camaro VS Mustang Mega Thread | Beau Tie | Chevy Camaro vs... | 3644 | 03-09-2012 08:45 PM |
| Gran Turismo 5... No Camaro? | 5thGenOwner | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 111 | 12-06-2011 11:06 AM |
| Official 2011 Mustang GT info released | nester7929 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 81 | 12-28-2009 04:13 PM |