2010 Mustang

[gladiatoro]

If Ford puts the 5.0 BOSS motor in it i'll be the first in line to buy one

[13F20]

Just stumbled across these pics of the next Shelby GT500. This interior I am not sure if it is the standard mustang GT's or the GT500's.

[kevin2323]

Originally Posted by gladiatoro

If Ford puts the 5.0 BOSS motor in it i'll be the first in line to buy one

only if it stays with the same weight which it wont...so sadly I wont buy one. I am buying an srt 8 with better exterior, faster 0-60 and IRS..IMO. I think fords problem is the tiny v8s they put in the mustangs...makes me cry.

[Congoman775]

Originally Posted by kevin2323

only if it stays with the same weight which it wont...so sadly I wont buy one. I am buying an srt 8 with better exterior, faster 0-60 and IRS..IMO. I think fords problem is the tiny v8s they put in the mustangs...makes me cry.

well not to be a smart ass kevin, but if it came out with a BOSS engine, it would be faster 0-60.

BOSS would prob. do 380hp, add some weight, say 3750, so 0-60 4.7-4.6


hmm.

good matchup

[16yearoldcamarodriver]

LOL! That zebra is gonna get owned by the Lion! If you didn't get it, for all you unintelligent people, zebra is the "camaro fighter" and the lion is the actual Camaro.

[jack24]

Looks more like a dalmatian to me...

[kevin2323]

Originally Posted by Congoman775

well not to be a smart ass kevin, but if it came out with a BOSS engine, it would be faster 0-60.

BOSS would prob. do 380hp, add some weight, say 3750, so 0-60 4.7-4.6


hmm.

good matchup

definitely wouldn't be same weight....and more safety standards=no 4.6-4.7...that is a dream.

[KatarHol]

Originally Posted by kevin2323

only if it stays with the same weight which it wont...so sadly I wont buy one. I am buying an srt 8 with better exterior, faster 0-60 and IRS..IMO. I think fords problem is the tiny v8s they put in the mustangs...makes me cry.

I guess i'd cry too if the tiny V8 in the Bullitt Mustang is barely slower than a 425HP SRT8,that costs alot more by the way for not alot more performance.
I'd really cry when the again much cheaper SS comes out and cleans the clock of the USS...oops SRT8 Challenger.
The '10 Mustang and '10 Camaro are going to run off and leave the Dodge for dead,i'm not even counting the R/T,my 5 year old GT will kick that things ass.Two words describe the Challenger.......Mercury Marauder.......or Ford Thunderbird....or Chevy SSR........take your pick,any of those will work.....how about 3 words.....dead on arrival.

[13F20]

Wow, guys I was simply trying to let every one know that the next Shelby GT500 was on the way. I had no idea that the Camo on the car would spark such comical statements. Zebras and Dalmatian’s lol, lol.

[kevin2323]

Originally Posted by KatarHol

I guess i'd cry too if the tiny V8 in the Bullitt Mustang is barely slower than a 425HP SRT8,that costs alot more by the way for not alot more performance.
I'd really cry when the again much cheaper SS comes out and cleans the clock of the USS...oops SRT8 Challenger.
The '10 Mustang and '10 Camaro are going to run off and leave the Dodge for dead,i'm not even counting the R/T,my 5 year old GT will kick that things ass.Two words describe the Challenger.......Mercury Marauder.......or Ford Thunderbird....or Chevy SSR........take your pick,any of those will work.....how about 3 words.....dead on arrival.

haha your quite the ford fan. But 0-60 in 5.2? yea not even close to the 4.7-4.8 the 08s are running on auto so imagine the 6 speed. Yea they are a bit overpriced but guess what stock for stock it beats your car and I laugh at a slightly tuned gt with 10 more ponies going for 40k because it is called a bullitt. dodge destroyed ford in the exterior department IMO.

btw real world numbers for the RT are 0-60 in 5.3 without the engine broken in so imagine broken in auto rt 0-60 5.2-5.3 bigger engine = gt beat. Oh and wow it starts at 29k, amazing!

I guess the only thing dead on arrival is the 2010 mustang with minor exterior tweaks and more weight.

[pinkcamaro10]

no, they are definately little worms.

[Mr. Wyndham]

Originally Posted by kevin2323

haha your quite the ford fan. But 0-60 in 5.2? yea not even close to the 4.7-4.8 the 08s are running on auto so imagine the 6 speed. Yea they are a bit overpriced but guess what stock for stock it beats your car and I laugh at a slightly tuned gt with 10 more ponies going for 40k because it is called a bullitt. dodge destroyed ford in the exterior department IMO.

btw real world numbers for the RT are 0-60 in 5.3 without the engine broken in so imagine broken in auto rt 0-60 5.2-5.3 bigger engine = gt beat. Oh and wow it starts at 29k, amazing!

I guess the only thing dead on arrival is the 2010 mustang with minor exterior tweaks and more weight.

There's imagining things for argument's sale, and then there's real numbers, Kevin...remember that.............

[Mr. Wyndham]

hm...it seems to me the Camaro even had more aggressive-looking camouflage....interesting.



But seriously. I like it all except for one thing: What the heck is that razor-blade supposed to be on the back end?!? Surely not the production wing/spoiler!?

[The_Blur]

Originally Posted by Dragoneye

hm...it seems to me the Camaro even had more aggressive-looking camouflage....interesting.

That's appropriate for a car that's impotent in comparison, although I expect the GT500 to be a great match for those of us supercharging our V8s.