|
|
#1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Drove a 2010 GT and 2010 Challenger R/T Classic yesterday.
Yeah, to help my search I decided to drive a couple possibilites this weekend. I'll start with the Mustang. It was a 2010 GT Premium with Option package 4 (or something like that, hoodscoop and diiferent spoiler), 19 inch premium rims with Perelli PZeros, comfort package and the 3.73 rear gears. Sticker was between 35 and 36k.
Getting into it I noticed it shared a lot with the Camaro, the low tucked in roof made ingress/egress a little tricky, but nothing major just a little extra ducking LOL. The leather interior was beautiful and the leather seats were very comforable. It had plenty of legroom but hiproom was kinda tight for the those that are, say, bigger in arse and wider in hip LOL. I would have actually preferred the handbrake to be on the passenger side of the center comsole as that would have really helped that issue. Materials were pretty nice and it had alot of features and a lot of buttons LOL. The rearseat was really no better than the Camaro and in a comfy position for me (tall and long legged) the seat was nearly against the rear seat cushion. Now for the drive. The salewoman drove it out of the lot and up a hill to a park were we switched out. While here, I checked out under the hood, LOVE the huge strut tower brace and the 4.6 is still a nice looking motor under there. The trunk was a good size too and very usable. Now I took over the drive. The 5 speed transmission felt very good. Really snicked positively in the gates and was such a joy. The clutch seemed a little grabby at first and took a few seconds to get used to but the shifter and clutch really worked well together and was just a total blast to use. the 4.6 didn't really feel lacking on power. Did a bit of WOT merging back on the main highway and it was surprisingly smooth and power built nicely. It wasn't explosive but was well more than adequate. The suspension felt nicely buttoned down. The steering was very direct and had zero slop. Gave it a nervous feeling actually, then again i am used to driving a Jeep so probably just a matter of getting used to it. Overall it felt very nice. The taller spoiler actually helped the rear and it looked good in black. The interior was nice just a little tight. I am still not sure on the hoodscoop as it is just tacked on to the stock hood. IMHO, very nice car and excellent for anyone who wants a quick and good lookling sports coupe with good handling and a nice interior, but doesn't need to really use the rear seat and is not worried about being the quickest in the 1/4 mile. Some pictures of the Mustang Some pictures of the Mustang ![]() ![]() ![]() And the red on they had that also adds the window and side scoops to the larger spoiler and hood scoop. ![]() Now to the Challenger. It was a 2010 Challenger R/T with the Classic package (20 inch heritage wheels, stripes, leather, bluetooth, etc) and the sunroof. It was an automatic. Sticker was around 35.5. I had driven an SE earlier and liked it, but did think low end power was lacking, the suspension was a little soft, and I liked the interior, but it could be better. The R/T fixes all that plus some. The ride was considerably stiffer and the body seemed well controlled, no doubt stiffer springs and the 20s with lower profile tires certainly helped here. You could definatly feel more of the road, but the ride was still very smooth. It was VERY solid overall, really enjoyable. Getting on the throttle felt very good and honestly felt more urgent and pinned me back harder than the Mustang, though the auto seeemed a bit slower than I liked kicking down, but no worse than the V6 auto Camaro i drove, I still definatly prefer a manual! Steering wasn't as direct as the Mustang's, but still felt good. The interior was a huge step above the SE I drove. The dash had a nice low sheen soft touch material, the center area with the stereo, uconnect, and climate contols looked a lot better than the SE, the color was the same as the rest of the interior and low sheen instead of shiny silver plastic. The seats were comfortable and supportive without feeling confined. Listened to the stereo and went through some Sirius satelite radio channels. I don't know if the Classic package comes with a stereo upgrade, but it sounded great, very clear with very nice base! The backseat had plenty of room, but entry could be better and it is only accessible from the passenger side. Overall I found it a very enjoyable car. It is a big car and there is no escaping that, but power was really good and felt excellent, the ride was very controlled, and the interior looked great, and black with white stripes is now my preferred R/T classic color. Pictures of the Challenger: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I went back and took pictures of both with my phone I will post once they are updated. Last edited by Stew; 05-02-2010 at 11:09 PM. Reason: Grammar and Spelling |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Challenger R/T;2011 Mustang GT Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,105
|
Very cool. Thanks for sharing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS IOM L99 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: LOUISVILLE,KY..
Posts: 7,545
|
nice evaluation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,418
|
So.....when are you going to quit fighting it and get a camaro?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hoser.
Drives: 2018 Z06 Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Greatest Country in the world.
Posts: 1,104
|
The Challenger is beautiful.
__________________
Speed is a substitute for clearance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't get it. The Mustang looks good in pictures, but when I see them in real life it doesn't do anything for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Challenger R/T;2011 Mustang GT Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,105
|
Quote:
The spoiler is what does it I think. The standard GT spoiler is flush just like the Camaro. IMO it adds a lot to the rear. I can sit and stare of the front of the 2010+ Mustang all day long however. It is amazing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
All 3 cars are so damned enjoyable! Here is something else also, a part of the package on the red GT is the panel in between the taillights, think that helps also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
|
Check out a '11.
Personally, I think the '10+ needs a rear drop, badly. The rear end just looks strange at it's stock ride height. I can't figure out exactly what makes it that way, but to me, when they're dropped they look fantastic. I agree that the front is great as is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Right now, for my needs, the Challenger is the lead. I am not cosidering anything out yet and really look forward to trying an SS, preferably an 11 2SS (loved the HUD in my GTP) amd also to drive the V6 and 5.0 Mustangs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
COTW: 12/13/10
Drives: 1969 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 7,880
|
The Mustang looks way better than the Challenger imo, at least stock for stock. The chally looks like it needs to be docked in a lake.
__________________
"Are you one of those boys who prefer cars to women? - I'm one of those boys that appreciates a fine body, regardless of the make." 1969 CAMARO JOURNAL: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=341239 | FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/taylor.ryan.apt | GRAPHIC DESIGN: www.aptdesigns.net |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,697
|
Quote:
Having seen mine and a Camaro in close distance..it comes down to personal opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
COTW: 12/13/10
Drives: 1969 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 7,880
|
Quote:
__________________
"Are you one of those boys who prefer cars to women? - I'm one of those boys that appreciates a fine body, regardless of the make." 1969 CAMARO JOURNAL: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=341239 | FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/taylor.ryan.apt | GRAPHIC DESIGN: www.aptdesigns.net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Looks wise for me Camaro = Challenger > Mustang
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|