The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-27-2012, 09:05 PM   #1
LEADfoot927
 
LEADfoot927's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 GT500 SVTPP
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Lewis, WA
Posts: 448
Thought my SS got bad gas milage

Over the weekend I bought my wife a 2003 Cadillac CTS. It has 220 hp, 3.2 liter v6, and a curb weight of 3550lbs. Immediately we noticied that it sucks through gas. When I looked up the EPA fuel consumption I was suprised: 16 city and 24 highway. My SS is rated at 16 city and 25 highway.

Can someone explain to me why a car with half the power and displacement, and 350 lbs lighter than my 2011 Camaro ss achieves these horrible numbers? Does the LS3 have more fuel fuel saving technology? Can it be the gearing? Im very confused.
__________________
Past rides:
2002 BMW M3
2010 Camaro V6
2010 Camaro SS L99
2011 Camaro SS Ls3
2011 Dodge Charger R/T
2012 Dodge Charger SRT8 Super Bee/ Reso Delete
Current ride:
2012 GT500/ 2.3 TVS, Afco Dual pass heat exchanger, Roush Extreme Exhaust: 606 rwhp/ 611 wtq
LEADfoot927 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2012, 09:07 PM   #2
jtzako

 
Drives: 2010 IBM Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DFW, Tx
Posts: 1,157
Gearing definitely could do that. Or the 220hp engine has to work harder to move that CTS more so than the 400+ hp engine of the Camaro.
__________________
2010 Camaro SS Imperial Blue | CAI Inc, CAI | Solo Hi Flow Cats | X-Pipe | Backup Camera | PDIM
jtzako is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2012, 09:08 PM   #3
zogster
 
Drives: 2014 RRM ZL1 M6
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: IL
Posts: 661
The '03 CTS has the old Opel 3.2L engine. Doesn't have the modern technology like the '04 and up with the 3.6L. Still you would think the mileage would at least be pretty decent, that's really bad.
zogster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2012, 09:39 PM   #4
SUX2BU
Quit being a pu$$y
 
SUX2BU's Avatar
 
Drives: FAST
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sachse TX (DFW)
Posts: 5,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEADfoot927 View Post
Over the weekend I bought my wife a 2003 Cadillac CTS. It has 220 hp, 3.2 liter v6, and a curb weight of 3550lbs. Immediately we noticied that it sucks through gas. When I looked up the EPA fuel consumption I was suprised: 16 city and 24 highway. My SS is rated at 16 city and 25 highway.

Can someone explain to me why a car with half the power and displacement, and 350 lbs lighter than my 2011 Camaro ss achieves these horrible numbers? Does the LS3 have more fuel fuel saving technology? Can it be the gearing? Im very confused.
You kind of just answered your own question.
SUX2BU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 12:19 AM   #5
CLEAN
 
CLEAN's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 Stingray '22 MB GLC 300
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 447
Engine w/ half the power has to work twice as hard for the same performance. Plus you've got an extra gear.
__________________
"Ever since we got the Camaro, everything seems better"
-My 6 year old daughter
CLEAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 12:21 AM   #6
ihaveacamaro
I like teeth.
 
ihaveacamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: #198
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 4,817
It's a 2003 so the tech and efficiency in the engine won't be as good as today's engines.
ihaveacamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 03:03 AM   #7
dolt45
Glorious Ignoramus
 
dolt45's Avatar
 
Drives: SS 45th
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 653
I'd start with a tune up.
If that didn't do the trick, screw it... turbo that sucker.
__________________
* Sent via Scooby-Doo decoder ring

Disclaimer: I really have no idea WTF I'm talking about.
dolt45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 03:19 AM   #8
BigDan

 
Drives: bug
Join Date: May 2009
Location: nv
Posts: 1,319
Its going on 10 years old.
BigDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 07:31 AM   #9
MMC

 
MMC's Avatar
 
Drives: CGM 2SS/RS, 1987 & 2014 Silverado
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Spencerport, NY
Posts: 1,012
Blame Ethanol for some of that, both of my trucks lost about 2 mpg since they started adding 10% to gas. The EPA uses 100% gas when they determine mileage ratings. http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/info.shtml
__________________
MMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 03:33 PM   #10
RichGreene
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2011 1SS M6 Green 1993 Custom Eldo
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 973
You would've been smarter getting the full size DeVille.The Northstar gets great gas mileage.
RichGreene is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PowerSlot Gas Slotted Rotors SS Xplosive Performance Suspension / Chassis / Brakes 42 06-22-2012 04:53 PM
2010 SS bad pan gasket? rxfox3 Camaro Issues / Problems | Warranty Discussions | TSB and Recalls 14 11-30-2011 10:10 PM
Rental SS 'Verts. I feel bad for them... United_727 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 22 05-16-2011 10:34 AM
gas milage question. porankazi 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 35 02-03-2011 11:47 AM
Camaro5 invites you to say thanks to Camaro assemblers and tour the Martinrea plant! Hylton 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 646 12-23-2009 04:41 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.