09-25-2019, 01:18 PM | #1 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99 Join Date: May 2019
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 119
|
Does deleting cats affect ignition timing or just air/fuel?
My question is how does changing the exhaust flow affect the engine? I know that the upstream o2 sensor and ECM'closed loop will correct the air/fuel ratio but is timing impacted by a less restrictive exhaust flow?
I'm trying to visualize the 4 stroke process and it seems at first glance that if the exhaust stroke is able to be sped up as a result of less backpressure at the exhaust valve you might have a problem with the timing of ignition spark and fuel injector timing. Is this true and if so, is the change negligible? Im a newby just trying to understand this stuff. Thanks for any and all help. |
09-25-2019, 01:59 PM | #2 |
Not really......Less restriction of the exhaust flow could have a slight effect on the mixture being drawn into the cylinders through scavenging but only occurs during the overlap portion of your cam rotation. I wouldn't suspect a significant spark change from a cat delete. Your mixture is really only effected because it's being fine tuned by the O2 feedback system. If you disable the feedback loop and monitor your baseline lambda pre-delete, the lambda post delete is likewise going to remain largely unchanged.
Back to that scavenging, the best way to optimize that would be with tuned headers. Less pipe restriction will increase the velocity of the exhaust gas which will aid in pulling waste out and mixture in during overlap. A high flow cat or cat delete can help enhance the effect from tuned headers.
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS
2018 Charger GT+ 2005 Cavailer LS S/C - Sold '87 HD FXRT - Wrecked pending repair |
|
09-25-2019, 02:48 PM | #3 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99 Join Date: May 2019
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 119
|
Ok thanks, that makes sense. But now I'm trying to make sense of how 15rwhp can be gained by deleting cats, from mechanical perspective, without sacrificing timing and/or air/fuel. Where are the extra horses coming from? I guess I have more googling to do.
|
09-25-2019, 03:11 PM | #4 | |
SoCal Camaro5 Race Team
Drives: 2021 Shadow Grey Camaro 2SS 1LE Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 14,294
|
Quote:
I tested the power of hiflows with shortys. Across the board was 10 lb ft if tq. Average hp was 10. Peak ho from 5200-5700 was 13-16. 5809 to 6300 power steadily dropped to 5 at 6300 |
|
09-25-2019, 06:37 PM | #5 |
Things to keep in mind too.....Does whoever is making the gain claim state if the car has ANY other mods to support or if it is bone stock. Simple things like a CAI or header will support that delete. Also, that gain is going to be a peak gain. It wont be evenly across the curve as the removal of a restriction will cause the air flow through the motor to gain efficiency only when the velocity of the air out is sufficient to aid in scavenging. Think kinda like spooling up a turbo, only instead of creating pressure in front of the intake valve it's creating a vacuum behind the intake valve.
*Quick thought* the power gained also isn't just power gained. It is going to be a mixture of gained power and power freed up from less resistance to the mechanical exhaust stroke.
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS
2018 Charger GT+ 2005 Cavailer LS S/C - Sold '87 HD FXRT - Wrecked pending repair |
|
09-25-2019, 06:55 PM | #6 | |
SoCal Camaro5 Race Team
Drives: 2021 Shadow Grey Camaro 2SS 1LE Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 14,294
|
Quote:
|
|
09-25-2019, 08:04 PM | #7 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99 Join Date: May 2019
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 119
|
Quote:
|
|
09-25-2019, 08:11 PM | #8 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99 Join Date: May 2019
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 119
|
Quote:
I guess I was trying to figure out how that vacuum, or lack of pressure that you speak of actually contributes to more hp. And also how the change in exhaust flow through the exhaust valve doesnt screw the timing or a/f up. Based on what you said and some other reading I did i believe I was just thinking about it wrong. The vacuum creates less stress on the engine and power that would have been used to push the exhaust out is now freed. Is that a decent way of thinking about it, for a newby like me? Lol |
|
09-25-2019, 08:51 PM | #9 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2012 2SS CAMARO 45th Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 18,663
|
The stock cats (and manifolds) are the most restrictive parts on the factory exhaust. They are restrictive. Get rid of them and there is power there. We dynoed a car before and after a set of Solo high flow cats and made 16rwhp. With long tubes and high flows we routinely make 36-40rwhp
|
09-25-2019, 10:13 PM | #10 | |
SoCal Camaro5 Race Team
Drives: 2021 Shadow Grey Camaro 2SS 1LE Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 14,294
|
Quote:
|
|
09-26-2019, 09:18 AM | #11 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99 Join Date: May 2019
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 119
|
Quote:
That's really good numbers. I just put high flows on my car yesterday but I can already tell this is the beginning of a long journey. The mod bug finally got me |
|
09-26-2019, 09:19 AM | #12 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99 Join Date: May 2019
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 119
|
Can you clarify what you mean by what you got for peak stock? You mean only high flows on an otherwise stock car?
|
09-26-2019, 09:35 AM | #13 | |
SoCal Camaro5 Race Team
Drives: 2021 Shadow Grey Camaro 2SS 1LE Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 14,294
|
Quote:
The test showed 13 hp at 5000 rpm, 16 hp max at 5300, 11 hp at stock peak of 5850, 5 hp at 6200 |
|
09-26-2019, 09:42 AM | #14 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99 Join Date: May 2019
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 119
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|