|
|
#1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: IOM 2013 2SS/RS, Greenie, 06 FXSTBi Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Turd Town, WI
Posts: 1,602
|
I learned something new today! (Vega shipping)
Remember the Chevy Vega? This is how some were shipped.
Until the early 1960s, automobiles moved by rail were carried in boxcars. These were 50 feet long with double-wide doors. Inside was room for four full-sized sedans on a two-tier rack - two raised up off the floor on a steel rack and two others tucked in underneath them. This protected the cars during transport but wasn’t very efficient, as the weight of four vehicles was far less than the maximum weight a boxcar that size could carry. When 85-foot and 89-foot flatcars came into service, it was possible to pack a total of fifteen automobiles in one car on tri-level auto racks. But it still didn’t approach the maximum allowable weight for each flatcar. When Chevrolet started designing Vega during the late 1960s, one of the main objectives was to keep the cost of the car down around $2,000 in circa-1970 dollars. At the time, the freight charge for moving a loaded railroad car from the Lordstown, OH assembly plant to the Pacific coast - the longest distance cars produced at Lordstown would need to travel - was around $4,800. Since the Vega was a subcompact, it was possible to squeeze three more cars on a railroad car for a total of eighteen, instead of the usual fifteen. But that still worked out to around $300 per car – a substantial surcharge for a $2000 car. If only Chevrolet could get more Vegas on a railroad car, the cost per unit of hauling them would go down. The engineers at GM and Southern Pacific Railroad came up with a clever solution. Instead of loading the cars horizontally, the Vegas were to be placed vertically on a specially designed auto-rack called the Vert-A-Pac. Within the same volume of an 89-foot flatcar, the Vert-A-Pac system could hold as many as 30 automobiles instead of 18. Chevrolet's goal was to deliver Vegas topped with fluids and ready to drive to the dealership. In order to be able to travel nose-down without leaking fluids all over the railroad, Vega engineers had to design a special engine oil baffle to prevent oil from entering the No. 1 cylinder. Batteries had filler caps located high up on the rear edge of the case to prevent acid spilling, the carburetor float bowl had a special tube that drained gasoline into the vapor canister during shipment, and the windshield washer bottle stood at a 45 degree angle. Plastic spacers were wedged in beside the powertrain to prevent damage to engine and transmission mounts. The wedges were removed when cars were unloaded. The Vega was hugely popular when it was introduced in 1970, however it quickly earned a reputation for unreliability, rust and terrible engine durability. When the Vega was discontinued in 1977, the Vert-A-Pac cars had to be retired as they were too specialized to be used with anything else. The Vert-A-Pac racks were scrapped, and the underlying flatcars went on to other uses. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Retarded One-Legged Owl
Drives: 2010 Black Camaro 2SS Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 9,745
|
That's pretty clever.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Drives: 2011 2ss Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 272
|
That's cool. American ingenuity.
__________________
2011 2ss Ram twin plate ceramic clutch, Texas speed 418 LS3 235 /243 .621 / .624 cam, ported and polished heads with dual springs,magnum push rods, Hotchkis race pack, Stainless Power long tube headers with no cats, Magna Flo competition exhaust, lpe fuel pump, magnuson supercharger with overdrive and port matched blower plate, IW 8 rib pullies, AEM meth kit, id 850 injectors, 3 bar map, halltech cai, zl1 rear diff
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Drives: 98 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 461
|
No wonder those cars were junk. Lol
And I have a Monza.
__________________
98 Camaro SS M6, a few mods
13 Ram R/T, tow vehicle 6th gen?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: nothing Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: a hole
Posts: 17,904
|
That's awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '11 2SS, '11 C6 GS, '04 MDX Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kearney, MO
Posts: 2,907
|
I will admit that I thought Vega's were cool looking when they were new. I remember walking around looking at them around '73 and the reputation was going down - dad said he didn't want one due to engine problems...
Those are really cool pics. Had no clue they were shipped that way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 RS - 2013 2SS/RS - 1971 RS Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,027
|
great find
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: IOM 2013 2SS/RS, Greenie, 06 FXSTBi Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Turd Town, WI
Posts: 1,602
|
A buddy emailed it to me today. I found it pretty interesting. We'd s#$t little green apples if they shipped our Camaros this way!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2021 Shadow Gray 1LS Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Streetsboro Ohio
Posts: 1,370
|
They made them at Lordstown, about 25 miles away from me.
I considered one, but by the time I bought my first new car ('74) talk of sleeving the crappy aluminum blocks and the excessive body rust scared me away from it. I bought a Nova instead, which had enough issues of its own. Guessing the top photos are 71's , and the bottom 74 or later. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Moderator.ca
|
Read this on Autoblog a couple months ago. Pretty neat solution, but I wonder how much extra it cost to design everything so that the engine wouldn't be killed by sticking the cars on their nose for shipping.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2004 Monte Carlo LS Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 2,414
|
that's freaking sweet!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|