The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-27-2012, 10:22 AM   #1
papawattz
 
papawattz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS +2014 El Tigre
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South West Michigan
Posts: 344
Come on Chevy, really!!

I just received my new motor trend and read the comparo for best family sedan and was like, what the hell! Last place, sixth out of six cars ! Now I know the new Malibu has been out for a few months and have seen one in person.My first impression was, a little to busy, some Camaro styling cues that were not needed, but overall nice materials and built well. But it wasn't until I seen this car compared with the 5 other carsWOW, Chevy really dropped the ball on this one! I advise you to read the article if you can, to really see where I'm coming from. It was the heaviest, by about 200 plus pounds, the most expensive, the smallest, one of the slowest AND the worst fuel economy Why the hell would anyone even consider this car? I'm a pretty diehard Chevy/GM guy, and I can tell you right now, I would not buy this car! If I was in the market, it would be the new Fusion, sorry it is just hands down a better car. Chevy needs to fire everyone who was a part of this design and development Come on, you no the rules to building a bread and butter family sedan to make money on? First, solid and reliable, second, good mainstream styling, third ,good performance and efficiency and last price it at or below the competition chevy failed at three of the four? How do plan to succed Leave the over the top styling to cars like the Camaro or Corvette! DUMBASSES
papawattz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 11:27 AM   #2
willhe64

 
willhe64's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 45th Vert, 2011 4x4, 9sec Vega
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,188
I had a 2010 Fusion AWD sport. It was a great car. Needed a truck though so I traded it on a 2011 Silverado.
__________________
I feel it only fair to warn you, I have a black belt in CAPS LOCK.
willhe64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 11:59 AM   #3
Frank in MD
Raining Blood
 
Frank in MD's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 SS Performance Sedan
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: facebook
Posts: 2,682
While I agree that the car isn't Chevrolet's best effort, your logic is questionable. What makes you say it will not reliable, and dependable? It's got a better warranty than all others in that comparo. It's not priced more expensively than the others in the segment either, that's bunk. Possibly the magazine that did the comparo tested a high end Malibu but it's not priced more than others in the segment. Keep in mind, many others build their cars w/o union labor. The cost of the materials and labor from the big 3 is higher than their rivals, thus others can offer a lower starting price. Again, it's not a very big gap and what you get for the difference in price is clear to see, hear, touch and feel. Sad that the Camry places higher than Malibu. Camry is junk, JUNK! They use a maintenance battery, meaning you have to add distilled water. Hey Toyota, the 80' called, they want their car back.

Lastly you gave the Fusion high marks, which has by all accounts has edgy "over the top" styling, then you demerit Chevy for doing the same. Very confusing and inconsistent. The Fusion has beautiful styling, but the beauty of the Aston Martin styling is skin deep. It's going to be waaaaaaaaaaaaay under powered and as soon as people drive it they'll feel how underpowered it really is and will not consider it.

I agree on the fuel economy issue, as it's inconceivable to me GM's new engine gets just 34 hwy when the outgoing 2.4 got 33 hwy. Yes, the engine itself is impressive in it's performance, which is why Ward's gave it one of their annual 10 best new engine awards. Sadly, the new 'bu is just too damn heavy to make that engine any good.
__________________
Ordered 1/9/12 - Born 2/3/12 - Delivered 2/21/12 - '12 1SS/RS Summit White - TRADED.

2014 SS Performance Sedan #2974 - Red Hot 2 - S/R. & Spare. Built 01/09/14 #238 of 291 as configured
Frank in MD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 12:03 PM   #4
GearheadSS


 
GearheadSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 23 LT1/86 IROC-Z
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greenville, Tx
Posts: 5,038
The 2.0T is where it's at in the new Malibu. If you want better fuel economy, get the eco. It gets 37mpg highway. It's not a bad car at all. They're MUCH better than the outgoing model.
GearheadSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 12:09 PM   #5
Frank in MD
Raining Blood
 
Frank in MD's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 SS Performance Sedan
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: facebook
Posts: 2,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by GearheadSS View Post
The 2.0T is where it's at in the new Malibu. If you want better fuel economy, get the eco. It gets 37mpg highway. It's not a bad car at all. They're MUCH better than the outgoing model.
Sorry, I disagree. Why can't Chevy build a real hybrid and not this Malibu Eco thing? It gets less MPG than the regular line of Nissan Altima which gets 38 MPG. This is the Malibu Hybrid fiasco redux and will be equally dismal selling.
__________________
Ordered 1/9/12 - Born 2/3/12 - Delivered 2/21/12 - '12 1SS/RS Summit White - TRADED.

2014 SS Performance Sedan #2974 - Red Hot 2 - S/R. & Spare. Built 01/09/14 #238 of 291 as configured
Frank in MD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 12:17 PM   #6
GearheadSS


 
GearheadSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 23 LT1/86 IROC-Z
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greenville, Tx
Posts: 5,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank in MD View Post
Sorry, I disagree. Why can't Chevy build a real hybrid and not this Malibu Eco thing? It gets less MPG than the regular line of Nissan Altima which gets 38 MPG. This is the Malibu Hybrid fiasco redux and will be equally dismal selling.
Well, you're the expert.
GearheadSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 12:19 PM   #7
GaBoy25


 
GaBoy25's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS/RS M6/2500HD Lmm LTZ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,543
My service manager at the the local dealer was telling me those cars have turned into a nightmare for the department. While I was in there a lady returned hers for the 3rd time in 3 weeks due to her breaks squealing and vibration during breaking. She was irate! He said this type of thing happens often at the VERY small dealership.
__________________
FASTER than my SS....for now

2500HD (with a couple parts)



Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyotekiller View Post
I wonder if this could be why my car idles like its retarded...
GaBoy25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 12:23 PM   #8
GearheadSS


 
GearheadSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 23 LT1/86 IROC-Z
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greenville, Tx
Posts: 5,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaBoy25 View Post
My service manager at the the local dealer was telling me those cars have turned into a nightmare for the department. While I was in there a lady returned hers for the 3rd time in 3 weeks due to her breaks squealing and vibration during breaking. She was irate! He said this type of thing happens often at the VERY small dealership.
We haven't seen any come back with problems. We are a VERY small dealership.
GearheadSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 12:45 PM   #9
GaBoy25


 
GaBoy25's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS/RS M6/2500HD Lmm LTZ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by GearheadSS View Post
We haven't seen any come back with problems. We are a VERY small dealership.
Well these not always being the brightest individuals(aka Big Al and Bobby Joe)would lead me to believe demographics may be the culprit
__________________
FASTER than my SS....for now

2500HD (with a couple parts)



Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyotekiller View Post
I wonder if this could be why my car idles like its retarded...
GaBoy25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 01:02 PM   #10
Baba

 
Baba's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2LT RS Convertible
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: USAREUR, CONUS/DOD-A, VA
Posts: 1,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by papawattz View Post
I just received my new motor trend and read the comparo for best family sedan and was like, what the hell! Last place, sixth out of six cars ! Now I know the new Malibu has been out for a few months and have seen one in person.My first impression was, a little to busy, some Camaro styling cues that were not needed, but overall nice materials and built well. But it wasn't until I seen this car compared with the 5 other carsWOW, Chevy really dropped the ball on this one! I advise you to read the article if you can, to really see where I'm coming from. It was the heaviest, by about 200 plus pounds, the most expensive, the smallest, one of the slowest AND the worst fuel economy Why the hell would anyone even consider this car? I'm a pretty diehard Chevy/GM guy, and I can tell you right now, I would not buy this car! If I was in the market, it would be the new Fusion, sorry it is just hands down a better car. Chevy needs to fire everyone who was a part of this design and development Come on, you no the rules to building a bread and butter family sedan to make money on? First, solid and reliable, second, good mainstream styling, third ,good performance and efficiency and last price it at or below the competition chevy failed at three of the four? How do plan to succed Leave the over the top styling to cars like the Camaro or Corvette! DUMBASSES
Man, I DEFINITELY have to agree with you. GM "most often" seems to be juuust a hair behind its competitors. What GM is "banking on" from their customers, I just don't know.

Most of the criticism from near everyone over the years has been the CHEAP (not inexpensive but CHEAP) interior hard plastics and lack of refinement - non-locking glovebox, no rear armrests, no interior passenger grab handles. Add to that, smaller, heavier, slower and LESS FUEL ECONOMY, and I, like you, too, wouldn't go near some of these GMs. Stying cues, "Buying American" and "brand loyalty" just aren't enough for most people to make a long-term commitment to (readp; car payment).

God Damn, GM, at least give the customer some bang for their buck! Give 'em some FRIGGIN' MUSCLE or EXCELLENT FUEL ECONOMY!
__________________
2011 Camaro 2LT RS Convertible
Summit White
Black Leather
3 Pedals
Build Date: 06/27/2011

Purchased: 07/30/2011
Title Received: 08/15/2011

1984 Camaro (3rd Gen.): Traded: 1987

"Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss."
Baba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 01:37 PM   #11
GearheadSS


 
GearheadSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 23 LT1/86 IROC-Z
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greenville, Tx
Posts: 5,038
lol, y'all are funny. Talking about fuel economy. Between the Malibu, Altima, Camry, Fusion, Sonata and Accord with the base 4 cyl. engines, only the Altima has a significant advantage in mileage. All of the others are within 1mpg or the same as the Malibu. Some 1 better, some 1 less.

So the base 2.5L in the Malibu is right in line with most of the competition out there and it's probably more powerful than most.
GearheadSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 01:50 PM   #12
Bonanza7
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010, Rally Yellow, Black stripes
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by papawattz View Post
I just received my new motor trend and read the comparo for best family sedan and was like, what the hell! Last place, sixth out of six cars ! Now I know the new Malibu has been out for a few months and have seen one in person.My first impression was, a little to busy, some Camaro styling cues that were not needed, but overall nice materials and built well. But it wasn't until I seen this car compared with the 5 other carsWOW, Chevy really dropped the ball on this one! I advise you to read the article if you can, to really see where I'm coming from. It was the heaviest, by about 200 plus pounds, the most expensive, the smallest, one of the slowest AND the worst fuel economy Why the hell would anyone even consider this car? I'm a pretty diehard Chevy/GM guy, and I can tell you right now, I would not buy this car! If I was in the market, it would be the new Fusion, sorry it is just hands down a better car. Chevy needs to fire everyone who was a part of this design and development Come on, you no the rules to building a bread and butter family sedan to make money on? First, solid and reliable, second, good mainstream styling, third ,good performance and efficiency and last price it at or below the competition chevy failed at three of the four? How do plan to succed Leave the over the top styling to cars like the Camaro or Corvette! DUMBASSES
Typical for GM for decades. They start to get something right, and the something in their culture just won't let them keep it going. They blow it, usually on the small stff, but the small stuff adds up to a big stuff. Small example, but an irritating one: no USB connector. Can't work my ipod through the radio. My cheapest of all Hondas has that. Half the price of my Camaro. They have a suicidal wish at GM.
Bonanza7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 02:00 PM   #13
Chevy Fanatic
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS IOM/PEARL STRIPES-6M
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by GearheadSS View Post
lol, y'all are funny. Talking about fuel economy. Between the Malibu, Altima, Camry, Fusion, Sonata and Accord with the base 4 cyl. engines, only the Altima has a significant advantage in mileage. All of the others are within 1mpg or the same as the Malibu. Some 1 better, some 1 less.

So the base 2.5L in the Malibu is right in line with most of the competition out there and it's probably more powerful than most.
I 100% agree with GearheadSS. I have a 2013 Malibu LTZ. This is not at all a bad car as some of you are led to believe. I would listen to the tech that works on these cars all day long Vs some reviewer that sits at his desk badmouthing a car he maybe drove once (if at all). Having worked as a luxury auto tech for 21 years (Mercedes, BMW, Volvo, Jaguar, etc.)qualifies me to say the 2013 Malibu is a lot of car for the price.

As far as reviews go, don't beleive everything you read. Go out and drive (or better yet purchase) one of these vehicles and form your own opinion based on your own driving experience.

Last edited by Chevy Fanatic; 10-27-2012 at 02:33 PM.
Chevy Fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 02:09 PM   #14
z28racer

 
z28racer's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 SIM 2SS/ RS Sinergy M6,GMC2500HD
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 1,596
Last I checked Nissan or Ford are not high on the reliability list! Plus Motor trend is a joke!!! I would check Consumer Digest a non bias magazine that does not rate the cars by how much advertiser money they get!
z28racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.