2010 Ford Mustang Pricing Starts at $20,995

twenty7 · 02-19-2009, 01:39 PM

Sorry if this is a repost, but i used the search and didn't see it anywhere.

JALOPNIK

Good move for Ford, but who wants to bet this is just for the dummed down no-options-at-all base model?

KatarHol · 02-19-2009, 03:59 PM

The base model comes standard with 17' wheels,keyless entry,power windows-locks,cd player........probably the same stuff the Camaro comes standard with. Ford hasn't made a stripper no-options Mustang since the '90s. If you can put up with ugly standard wheels(Camaro),neither Mustang or Camaro need any options really to make them nice cars.

Sizzox · 02-19-2009, 04:13 PM

They have that at autoblog and all the comments on the bottom everyone said they would rather pay the extra 2k for the camaro. They all know it's a better car for the money.

Caliman93230 · 02-19-2009, 04:29 PM

the mustang is a f ing s***t but it will sell better, the price is the major factor in purchasing a car to most peoples

KatarHol · 02-19-2009, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sizzox

They have that at autoblog and all the comments on the bottom everyone said they would rather pay the extra 2k for the camaro. They all know it's a better car for the money.

It is a better car in every which way you look at it,but that didn't help it in the '90s,once Ford starts the rebates,GM better keep up and vice versa. A 300HP car for under 19K WILL be pretty awesome,if you want the V6.
Both have to contend with the Genesis,that 4-banger might be the most bang for the buck out of the 3.

truth411 · 02-19-2009, 10:14 PM

This is deceptive!!! the $20,995 does not include the $850 destination charge!! nor is it included in the $27,995 for the GT. it is actually $21,845 for the V6 and $28,845 for the V8. But they do include the destination charge for the camaro...DECEPTIVE..

Muscle Master · 02-19-2009, 10:22 PM

Would rather pay the extra 2 or 3 grand for an LS Camaro or SE Challenger

kevin2323 · 02-19-2009, 11:38 PM

SE challenger blows really hard...and i am a dodge guy

nester7929 · 02-20-2009, 12:23 AM

Yeah, the SE shouldn't even exist. Not nearly enough power to move something that big.

I've never understood the point of buying a V6 pony car (I'll make exceptions for the Camaro's DI V6 and the Ecoboost). The entire point of a pony car is to get a big engine, and a V6 completely defeats the purpose.

And the Mustang's game has ALWAYS been to offer a somewhat inferior product at a lower cost. Considering how well it's worked for the last several years, I can't say I blame their strategy.

TheClassicCarKid · 02-20-2009, 12:47 AM

2000 bucks more for something that looks better and will outperform it in every way? Good deal.

kylepo · 02-20-2009, 01:27 PM

try it starts at around 22k they left the freight out of that price quote.

*DGthe3* · 02-21-2009, 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nester7929

Yeah, the SE shouldn't even exist. Not nearly enough power to move something that big.

I've never understood the point of buying a V6 pony car (I'll make exceptions for the Camaro's DI V6 and the Ecoboost). The entire point of a pony car is to get a big engine, and a V6 completely defeats the purpose.

And the Mustang's game has ALWAYS been to offer a somewhat inferior product at a lower cost. Considering how well it's worked for the last several years, I can't say I blame their strategy.

The SE has better power to weight than the Mustang does . . . heck, my 175 hp Grand Am wouldn't be too far behind a V6 Mustang.

Why buy a V6 pony car? The V6 is about buying a cool looking sporty coupe.

*The_Blur* · 02-22-2009, 12:02 AM

That's a good price for a car that clearly underperforms when compared to the competition. The price should be cheaper.

nester7929 · 02-22-2009, 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DGthe3

The SE has better power to weight than the Mustang does . . . heck, my 175 hp Grand Am wouldn't be too far behind a V6 Mustang.

Why buy a V6 pony car? The V6 is about buying a cool looking sporty coupe.

Yeah, but you can get a decently-equipped GT for the same price as an SE.

02-19-2009, 01:39 PM	#1
twenty7 Drives: lil red buick. Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: wiscansin Posts: 99	2010 Ford Mustang Pricing Starts at $20,995 Sorry if this is a repost, but i used the search and didn't see it anywhere. JALOPNIK Good move for Ford, but who wants to bet this is just for the dummed down no-options-at-all base model?

02-19-2009, 04:29 PM	#4
Caliman93230 Drives: LS3S/C Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: CALI Posts: 1,344	the mustang is a f ing s***t but it will sell better, the price is the major factor in purchasing a car to most peoples __________________ MODS whipple 2.9L s/c, ADM race scoop, 600 rwhp 550 wrtq, .

02-22-2009, 12:02 AM	#13
The_Blur Moderator Drives: 2018 Harley-Davidson Street Bob Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: San Diego Posts: 14,768	That's a good price for a car that clearly underperforms when compared to the competition. The price should be cheaper. __________________ RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet// Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
2010 Camaro Interior trumped by 2010 Mustang?	Beau Tie	Chevy Camaro vs...	91	02-28-2011 05:07 PM
2010 Camaro Pricing for Canada Announced	garfin	Camaro Price \| Ordering \| Tracking \| Dealers Discussions	503	05-24-2009 05:59 PM
Mustang Premium Pricing Revealed	Croathlete	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	56	11-24-2008 02:22 AM
2007 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Convertible	KILLER74Z28	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	10	04-11-2008 05:11 PM
Financial Problems for Ford???	TAG UR IT	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	14	10-29-2006 07:17 PM

02-19-2009, 03:59 PM	#2
KatarHol Drives: '04 Mustang GT Join Date: May 2008 Location: TN Posts: 313	The base model comes standard with 17' wheels,keyless entry,power windows-locks,cd player........probably the same stuff the Camaro comes standard with. Ford hasn't made a stripper no-options Mustang since the '90s. If you can put up with ugly standard wheels(Camaro),neither Mustang or Camaro need any options really to make them nice cars.

02-19-2009, 10:14 PM	#6
truth411 Drives: 2022 SS 1LE Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Austin, tx Posts: 1,301	This is deceptive!!! the $20,995 does not include the $850 destination charge!! nor is it included in the $27,995 for the GT. it is actually $21,845 for the V6 and $28,845 for the V8. But they do include the destination charge for the camaro...DECEPTIVE..

02-19-2009, 11:38 PM	#8
kevin2323 Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: miami Posts: 2,338	SE challenger blows really hard...and i am a dodge guy

02-20-2009, 12:23 AM	#9
nester7929 Rice Harvester Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2008 Location: Plainview, TX Posts: 1,449	Yeah, the SE shouldn't even exist. Not nearly enough power to move something that big. I've never understood the point of buying a V6 pony car (I'll make exceptions for the Camaro's DI V6 and the Ecoboost). The entire point of a pony car is to get a big engine, and a V6 completely defeats the purpose. And the Mustang's game has ALWAYS been to offer a somewhat inferior product at a lower cost. Considering how well it's worked for the last several years, I can't say I blame their strategy.

02-20-2009, 01:27 PM	#11
kylepo Drives: 2002 firehawk.....missing 02CE Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Midland MI/salamanca NY Posts: 360	try it starts at around 22k they left the freight out of that price quote.