View Single Post
Old 08-09-2017, 12:03 PM   #6
DenverTaco07


 
DenverTaco07's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2017 Volt, 2013 Pilot
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
What bothers me more is that cable TV doesn't have any caps. 100 hours per month of high def video isn't unusual (~3 hours per weekday, and a total of about 10 on the weekend). I'm not sure what the raw video rate is for high def cable TV, but I think it exceeds 10 GB/hour. That puts things at ~1TB of TV in a month for a fairly typical use case. But if you wanted to, you could run your TV 24/7 and your cable bill would be just as much.

Meanwhile, the same company that will sell you as much TV as you want to watch will also sell you internet access -over the very same cables, now decides that with a more bandwidth efficient delivery method, you need to be limited in how much data you can consume in a month. WTF?
It is a digital signal now, so I think they should know in fact how many bits they are pushing to provide you your HBO GOT and all that jazz, so yes, i haven't thought of that, but yeah, another reason to question the purpose of this tactic.

Earlier this year I built a new computer, after downloading the OS, and programs and one game (Rainbow six siege), i got a notice from Comcast saying I had gone over my limit, which didn't exist when I first signed up. Now, it was a warning that said I'd not be charged extra "this time"...but I was so freakin pissed about the principle violation as i see it, I cancelled them and went to DSL. Unfortunately my experience is way worse now

we need more than two options!!

IMO, Internet infrastructure (fiber optics and I suppose coax - although i think it might be going obsolete) needs to be a shared infrastructure where multiple companies can come in to a "central office" install gear to provide service...if they choose.

sort of like a DAS (Distributed Antenna System for cellular service) infrastructure, where the head end is available for use by multiple carriers, if they choose. Till then, we will continue to pay much higher prices for ISP.

a city in Colorado, Longmont I believe, is providing 1Gbps internet service to its residents for like $50 a month. Can you imagine...$50 a month for speeds 10 times faster than what I pay $70 a month for.
__________________
2017 SS 1LE | HBM | Vortech V3-Si supercharger (620RWHP and 575ft lbs) | PDR | Black Bowties | Illuminated Front Black Bowtie | Illuminated Door Sills | Smoked Tails | vented seats mod

Last edited by DenverTaco07; 08-09-2017 at 12:13 PM.
DenverTaco07 is offline   Reply With Quote