Quote:
Originally Posted by hotlap
One quick search to find a post dated 11-17-14 questioning Ford's decision to offer a street only version of the GT350. Lawyers will find this
|
What? Some guy on the internet says that track cars should come with more than what the GT350 has? Who cares. I can also find posts where people say the Z/28 should have come with less than it did. Its just someones opinion, on web forum, for a competitors car. I more or less agree with Mgizzle, but that doesn't make it evidence. Its just an opinion, and you can find opinions on the internet either for or against pretty much anything. Doesn't mean they're worth anything in court.
Unless it comes from Fords website, or a press release, or their brochure, or advertisements, or instructions to dealers on how to sell the car, or ANYTHING from Ford Motor Company, its worthless. Anything that says, or at least implies, that the base and/or tech package GT350s were fully track capable from the factory will be useful.
Magazines are not Ford. Car forums are not Ford. Fords dealers are not Ford.
If you are going to blame Ford for misleading buyers, you need to show how they deliberately lied to those buyers for the purpose of making them believe their car was more track capable than it was. Likewise, if you are saying that they included the track package because people complained their base/tech cars were not track capable ... get a hold of the memos or emails that say so. But it has to come from Ford.