View Single Post
Old 10-07-2016, 06:24 PM   #123
Zeke.Malvo

 
Zeke.Malvo's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
Quote:
Originally Posted by DisturbedSS View Post
The Mustang I speak of was 700HP...and I do have curved track experience. It was HP overkill, but as far as handling goes, the 2015 and earlier model GTs were using an outdated rear setup (whether stang owners admit it or not) - the new IRS was proof it needed to catch up with what everyone else already had. I grew up on Mustangs and still have a soft spot for anything Shelby.

If people dont think the newer stangs handle better, then they have no experience to compare against and are just posting out their rear. Its night and day difference. Id venture to say Ive had far more Mustangs over my lifespan than the mass majority.

Independent testing still shows that Camaros can handle better even on the new 2017s. Its not my opinion, its others far more knowledgeable than myself. Both cars have different strengths, so not meant as a pissing match on which car is better.

Ask a Mustang owner to drive a Camaro and he/she will go blind from lack of visibility - just trying to even up the insults.
I think you've lost track of time, the Mustangs have had IRS since the introduction of the S550 starting with the 2015 model year. Actually, Ford offered it since back in '99.

Either way, even the solid axle S197 cars were generally seen as better performers than the IRS 5th gen camaros until the 5th gen suspension was revised.
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtq
T56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear
Zeke.Malvo is offline   Reply With Quote