Quote:
Originally Posted by motorhead
Right, my opinion not fact of course. You feel different and that's great. I know what you're saying about using the T/A name when that was a road course car, but Dodge isn't trying to do what GM did with the Z/28. They are more about exciting the senses with eye candy and value based performance which I believe this car does well. Would you rather see them do a full on road course car that ends up costing 70 to 80grand to end up a year or two later with 20grand in discounts because the 20 people in the world that really want that type of car to use it as intended bought them and the real consumer won't shell out that much coin for the ultimate handling Challenger? Sound familiar?
|
As an enthusiast yes, as a stock holder definitely no. I was really hoping the T/A wouldn't make an appearance until the new platform was launched. To me this is like the same problem GM made making the Z28 the name plate for the base V8. I guess I should be happy it wasn't something even more stupid like calling it a Cuda.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3
"Voices in your head are not considered insider information."
3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!)
6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!)