[DRKS1D3]

Originally Posted by bpang1234

Pretty sure the OP just wants attention.

I mean, if he's happy, good for him. Simply put, there is just no correlation between the two vehicles. Every negative he mentioned about the Camaro screams exactly what a pony car actually is (small back seat, limited trunk space, etc.). He knew what to expect when he made the purchase just a few, short months ago.

I also didn't know much about the newer SHO's so I looked them up. The 2012 was the last year of a dated style. 2013 saw a much needed, complete redesign.

When tested, Motor Trend said the 2012 was mediocre at best.
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/ford/taurus/2012/

I see Koon's, the dealer he dealt with, has another SHO. This one is a 2014 ($27,500 w/ 21k miles on it).
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Ford-Taurus-...m=302003159671 He obviously paid less than this, considering the 2012 is the old body style. Perhaps he couldn't pay the note and needed to dump the Camaro? I'm sure the Camaro booked for nearly twice what the 4 year old SHO did. Again, if he's happy, that's cool.