View Single Post
Old 06-08-2016, 11:18 PM   #3481
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
The M551 Sheridan used aluminum armor, but it's hardly a tank. The vehicle they showed looked like an M2/3 Bradley, which doesn't use aluminum armor. It uses layered composite armor. Their may be aluminum in it but it's not entirely aluminum.
Why, because it could be dropped from a plane & could fire missiles from its main gun? The air drop thing makes a certain amount of sense. And the Sheridan probably did a better job at being an air-deployed tank than the Tetrarch of WWII.

Shooting missiles from the gun on the other hand ... ? Why not just stick a couple launchers on the outside of the turret, similar to what ended up happening on the Bradley? Seems like that would have been a much better solution to give the tank some anti-armour punch.




Anyway, it was still a tank. A light tank, sure. But a tank none the less. It just put a lot more emphasis on the mobility part of the tank design triangle (firepower, protection, and mobility). But thats just the nature of a light tank.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote