[fldrummer]

Originally Posted by h422694

The report is NOT showing 0-60 mph times like you indicate. It is showing the time from start line to 60' down the track. Quite a difference. Not sure you could find any car that goes 0-60mph in less than 2 seconds.

^Correct. SMH. The 0-60s are in the sub-4-second range with just a tune and most of these guys trapping 114+ mph in the 1/4-mile are doing it with just a tune and downpipe--less than $2k in modifications! It took 3x the displacement, all the bolt-ons and a cam swap for my LS3 to trap 114 mph. Granted, it's much faster now and about to get even faster (700 rwhp, here I come)--still my go-to vehicle for all-out fun, but you can't tell me that's not impressive for a little 2.0-liter. If you're still not impressed, go for a ride in a Stage 3+ Golf R like I did--runs 10s and embarrasses most cars on the street...

Anyway, I didn't buy this car for all-out performance or to replace my Camaro. I bought it because it's a perfect (for me) Jack of all trades--economy, practicality, performance. 'Sure beats the boring "beater" it DID replace; LOL...