Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323
I totally agree with you about the challengers numbers, they should be alot better. I am just defending it because most on this forum trash it as if it was slow. I thank you for giving credit where credit is due.
|
I'm not one to put up a biased defense if I can help it....but really, can you blame anyone here (me, too -- I've done it!) for tearing into the Mopar? It's a
Camaro forum, after all!
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323
Also don't tell me that chevy didn't hold out just to see what dodge came up with so they could go more into detail and refine and make sure it was a notch above dodge. That is where I think dodge had the balls.
|
I
am telling you; there was no sitting around. I'll grant that they may have altered plans along the way as more info on the Challenger came out, but delaying the release of this car just so they could "wait and see" probably wasn't considered a good idea, given the timeframe they had to work within.
I think Dodge rushed their car to market. Which GM
could have done; but I'm 100% glad they didn't.
*disclaimer; this is all me assuming things based on what I've been reading for the past two years. I haven't been told, nor was involved with any of the Camaro's development.