I don't remember seeing anything that confirmed it was on its way in the first place. Just some periodic internet speculation that GM
might be bringing it back. But 0 actual evidence of them planning on building such a car like prototypes or a sporty concept car.
And really, it makes sense that they wouldn't do it. In essence, a GNX would be an ATS-V for around 10 grand less. What incentive does GM have to actually do that? Sure, its great for customers. But its not so great for GM. Especially as they are doing everything they can to give Cadillac & Buick unique brand identities. A GNX works against that, or at least a proper one does. They could make a turbocharged AWD Regal & call it a GNX if they like and it wouldn't affect Cadillac one bit. But if you do that, why bother calling it a GNX?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denis
that's okay with me...honestly im getting a little tired of the revival of old names being given to new cars that lack the heritage. (Charger for example)
|
Indeed, how dare Dodge follow up the Charger with a Hemi V8 powered, rear drive, full size sedan. Afterall, the legacy of the Charger lies with the compact, 2 door, 4 cylinder, FWD car of the 80's.