Quote:
Originally Posted by fdjizm
that document is from the GM website, hense the snapped output shafts and shaved gears on some people hammering the car... why do i feel like you think i am making this all up? you are extremely difficult to talk to and you seem generally mad at a car.
|
Its a known fact that the output shafts were never treated properly. It has nothing to do with its ratings. They were defective from the supplier.
You still never answered my questions.
How is the Mustang a better muscle car if it loses almost every catagory concering performance to the Camaro?
If they werent judging performance why put "Mustang wins with less power" and have hp levels on the cover with 3 MUSCLE cars?
How is a 5speed manual better than a 6 speed manual that can handle more power?
Im not mad, you just dont make sense.
Let me know when a track pack Mustang laps the ring in 8:20. I mean it wins with less power. It pulls more g's. Its got better trunk space.
I honestly dont even care that the mustang won the article. Its how they portray it on the cover as if its a better performance car with 100 less hp, when its b.s. They can say it has better interior and trunk space ect.ect.ect. Who cares? It still gets its ass whooped on the streets and any track. It bothers me that they didnt mention that. Its because of $$$$. You can spin any car to be better than any other car if you compare them correctly. Thats what they did.