Quote:
Originally Posted by ssump29
You probably got bad info for whatever person you talked to about the warranty, one person says one thing and the next person you talk too will say they were wrong. As far as you complaining about the Camaro sitting and others getting theirs before you. OH WELL that shit happens, your car got flagged for additional testing big deal this happens in business but its clear you don't get it either that or you're a spoiled brat who believes you should have everything your way. Like I said my car sat in QC for over 40 days and some people got theirs before me and didn't have to sit in QC. Oh well no need to be mad about it, just cause its the same car as yours doesn't mean yours didn't need extra attention. GET REAL sir. 
And another thing the warranty is 3years or 36,000 miles whichever comes first. Thats most warranties on any car so no one has to do anything for you, so quit thinking just because it has low miles they should cover it. It's clear it's pasted the three year mark. Either understand how this works or STOP buying cars all together because no company GM, Toyota, Ford or BMW is going to give you special treatment because you think you should get it. Plenty of people are buying expensive cars your not the only one. |
I don't car if my sat car in QC for a month, I am mad because it sat saying available to ship (out of QC) for 22 days as guys had their cars built and shipped in the same day. Very frustrating. I don't car if someones car sat at the same place for a 100 days, it doesn't make it right. Once again I am not mad at the GM company for putting the rag in the oil system I am mad because they say my car does not have enough kilometers on it to be covered. When you say the car is off warranty and I am a spoiled brat for thinking I should get warranty, well explain why I WOULD GET WARRANTY if the car had 2K more kilometers and was off warranty for another month. OBVIOUSLY they still cover vehicles in certain cases after warranty. MY ISSUE WITH GM, NOT THE DEALER, IS THAT THEY SAY MY CAR WON'T GET WARRANTY UNLESS IT HAD MORE MILES AND WAS OFF WARRANTY FOR LONGER. To me that makes no sense. One would think the chances of getting covered would increase with less miles and having been out of warranty for less time, apparently not. GM didn't just say, "Nope, your out of warranty so your out of luck!). They said, "sorry sir, not enough miles and car isn't old enough for us to cover it". Now my issue with the DEALER is the fact that it has only been serviced but GM dealers so I believe it is the DEALERS responsibility for the rag being in the oil pan. If the previous owner had given me receipts of work that had taken place elsewhere, well that's a different story. But the only records on it were done at GM goodwrench locations. Now whether I will buy GM again or not depends on how this is handled. IMO, I get my idea of how GM is through the dealers, can't say I have had to many experiences with GM directly, can you? The dealers are GM, they make it what it is. They represent the customer satisfaction, GM service, how kind they are to customers. IMO the dealers and the people who work there make all of the auto companies into what they are. What ever you guys think, I feel I should not be the one stuck with this bill and I do think that GM should hold some responsibility as they were, as far as the history shows, the only ones to pop the hood and do anything to this car.